ֱ

Columbia grad student’s detention will stretch on as lawyers spar over Trump’s plan to deport him

Columbia grad student’s detention will stretch on as lawyers spar over Trump’s plan to deport him
People gather outside of a New York court to protest the arrest and detention of Mahmoud Khalil at Foley Square on Mar. 12, 2025 in New York City. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 March 2025

Columbia grad student’s detention will stretch on as lawyers spar over Trump’s plan to deport him

Columbia grad student’s detention will stretch on as lawyers spar over Trump’s plan to deport him
  • After Khalil’s Manhattan arrest, Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered that the 30-year-old not be deported while the court considers a legal challenge brought by his lawyers
  • One of Khalil’s lawyers, Ramzi Kassem, told the judge that Khalil was “identified, targeted and detained” because of his advocacy for Palestinian rights and his protected speech

NEW YORK: Mahmoud Khalil will remain detained in Louisiana until at least next week following an initial court hearing in New York on Wednesday over the Trump administration’s plans to deport the Columbia University graduate student for his role in campus protests against Israel.
The brief hearing, which focused on thorny jurisdictional issues, drew hundreds of demonstrators to the federal courthouse in lower Manhattan to denounce the Saturday arrest of Khalil, a permanent US resident who is married to an American citizen. Khalil, 30, didn’t attend — after initially being held in New Jersey, he was moved to an immigration detention center in Louisiana.
After Khalil’s Manhattan arrest, Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered that the 30-year-old not be deported while the court considers a legal challenge brought by his lawyers, who want Khalil returned to New York and released under supervision.
During Wednesday’s hearing, attorney Brandon Waterman argued on behalf of the Justice Department that the venue for the deportation fight should be moved from New York City to Louisiana or New Jersey because those are the locations where Khalil has been held.
One of Khalil’s lawyers, Ramzi Kassem, told the judge that Khalil was “identified, targeted and detained” because of his advocacy for Palestinian rights and his protected speech. He said Khalil has no criminal convictions, but “for some reason, is being detained.”
Kassem also told Furman that Khalil’s legal team hasn’t been able to have a single attorney-client-protected phone call with him.
Furman ordered that the lawyers be allowed to speak with him by phone at least once on Wednesday and Thursday. Calling the legal issues “important and weighty,” the judge also directed the two sides to submit a joint letter on Friday describing when they propose to submit written arguments over the legal issues raised by Khalil’s detention.
Kassem said Khalil’s lawyers would update their lawsuit on Thursday.
Khalil’s arrest has sparked protests in New York and other US cities. Actor Susan Sarandon emerged from the courthouse and told reporters that “no matter where you stand on genocide, freedom of speech ... is a right that we all have.” She added: ”And this is a turning point in the history and the freedom of this country.”
Some of Khalil’s supporters, many of them wearing a keffiyeh and mask, attended the hearing. Hundreds more demonstrated outside the courthouse, beating drums, waving Palestinian flags and chanting for Khalil’s release. The raucous crowd grew quiet, though, to hear Kassem speak.
“As we tried to make clear in court today, what happened to Mahmoud Khalil is nothing short of extraordinary and shocking and outrageous,” Kassem told the crowd. “It should outrage anybody who believes that speech should be free in the United States of America.”
Kassem said the legal grounds cited by the government to detain Khalil were “vague” and “rarely used,” masking the true intent: “retaliation and punishment for the exercise of free speech.”
Columbia became the center of a US pro-Palestinian protest movement that swept across college campuses nationwide last year and led to more than 2,000 arrests.
Khalil, whose wife is pregnant with their first child, finished his requirements for a Columbia master’s degree in December. Born in Syria, he is a grandson of Palestinians who were forced to leave their homeland, his lawyers said in a legal filing.
President Donald Trump heralded Khalil’s arrest as the first “of many to come,” vowing on social media to deport students he described as engaging in “pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity.”
During a stopover in Ireland while headed from ֱ to a meeting of the G7 foreign ministers in Canada, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Khalil’s case is “not about free speech.”
“This is about people that don’t have a right to be in the United States to begin with. No one has a right to a student visa. No one has a right to a green card,” Rubio said.
Khalil, who acted as a spokesperson for Columbia protesters, hasn’t been charged with a crime. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that the administration moved to deport him under a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act that gives the secretary of state the power to deport a noncitizen on foreign policy grounds.
Civil rights groups and Khalil’s attorneys say the government is unconstitutionally using its immigration control powers to stop him from speaking out.
US Jewish groups and leaders and organizations have been divided in their response to Khalili’s detention.
Among those welcoming the move was the Anti-Defamation League, which said it hopes it serves as a “deterrent.”
“We appreciate the Trump Administration’s broad, bold set of efforts to counter campus antisemitism — and this action further illustrates that resolve by holding alleged perpetrators responsible for their actions,” the ADL said on social media.
Amy Spitalnick, CEO of Jewish Council for Public Affairs, decried Khalil’s detention.
The Trump administration “is exploiting real concerns about antisemitism to undercut democracy: from gutting education funding to deporting students to attacking diversity, equity, & inclusion,” she wrote on Bluesky. “As we’ve repeatedly said: this makes Jews — & so many others — less safe.”


Pakistan, Afghanistan talks begin in Qatar: Taliban

Pakistan, Afghanistan talks begin in Qatar: Taliban
Updated 30 min 22 sec ago

Pakistan, Afghanistan talks begin in Qatar: Taliban

Pakistan, Afghanistan talks begin in Qatar: Taliban
  • Both Akhund and Pakistan Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif have spoken with Anwar, who appears to be acting as a mediator in the crisis and “emphasized the need to resolve the issue through diplomatic means,” according to the Taliban readout

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan: Pakistani and Afghan officials began talks in Qatar on Saturday to defuse tensions, a senior Taliban official said, after at least 10 people were killed in Pakistani airstrikes following a brief truce.
Kabul had accused Islamabad of violating a 48-hour ceasefire, which briefly put a stop to nearly a week of cross-border clashes that killed dozens of troops and civilians on both sides.
Security sources in Islamabad said the latest strikes in the Afghan border areas targeted a militant group linked to the Pakistani Taliban, in retaliation for an attack on Pakistani paramilitary troops.
Afghanistan’s Prime Minister Hassan Akhund said “the discussions are indeed underway,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said on X, in a readout of Akhund’s talks with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.
Both Akhund and Pakistan Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif have spoken with Anwar, who appears to be acting as a mediator in the crisis and “emphasized the need to resolve the issue through diplomatic means,” according to the Taliban readout.
Pakistan’s foreign ministry said the talks in Doha aimed to “end cross-border terrorism against Pakistan emanating from Afghanistan and restore peace and stability along the Pak-Afghan border.”
Islamabad’s delegation includes Defense Minister Khawaja Asif and intelligence chief General Asim Malik, state TV reported.
The Afghan delegation was being headed by defense chief Mohammad Yaqoob, the Taliban defense ministry said on X.
Qatar has not commented on its role as host, though Pakistan’s foreign ministry thanked Doha for its “mediation efforts.”

- ‘Still afraid’ -

Security issues are at the heart of the tensions, with Pakistan accusing Afghanistan of sheltering militant groups led by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) — a claim Kabul denies.
The cross-border violence flared on October 11, days after explosions rocked Kabul during an unprecedented visit by the Taliban’s foreign minister Amir Muttaqi to India, Pakistan’s rival.
The Taliban then launched a deadly offensive along parts of its southern border with Pakistan, prompting Islamabad to vow a strong response.
Ahead of the talks, a senior Taliban official told AFP that Pakistan had bombed three locations in Paktika province late Friday, and warned that Kabul would retaliate.
A hospital official in Paktika told AFP that 10 civilians, including two children, were killed and 12 others wounded. Three cricket players were among the dead.
Zabihullah, the Taliban spokesman, wrote on X that their forces had been ordered to hold fire “to maintain the dignity and integrity of its negotiating team.”
Saadullah Torjan, a minister in Spin Boldak in Afghanistan’s south, said: “For now, the situation is returning to normal.”
“But there is still a state of war and people are afraid.”
Iran, a neighbor to both countries, offered to help defuse tensions.
In a call between the Iranian and Afghan foreign ministers, Tehran warned that the tensions “threaten to undermine the stability of the entire region,” according to state news agency IRNA.
 

 


Protest hits Rome over Libya migrant deal after boat wreck

Protest hits Rome over Libya migrant deal after boat wreck
Updated 18 October 2025

Protest hits Rome over Libya migrant deal after boat wreck

Protest hits Rome over Libya migrant deal after boat wreck
  • In return, Libya is expected to help stem the departure of migrants to Italy or return those already at sea back to Libya
  • Fratini has been helping migrants sue Italy after they were seized in the Mediterranean by Libya and pushed back to detention centers there.

ROME: Migrants and rights activists protested in Rome Saturday against Italy’s migrant deal with Libya, a day after some 20 people were feared dead in the latest boat wreck in the Mediterranean.
Under a controversial 2017 deal renewed under Prime Minister Georgia Meloni’s hard-right government, Italy funds and trains the Libyan coast guard.
In return, Libya is expected to help stem the departure of migrants to Italy or return those already at sea back to Libya. That agreement is up for renewal next month.
During the protest, dozens of migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa recounted what they endured in Libya, and a minute of silence was held for those who died trying to cross the Mediterranean.
Hundreds of people attended the event, including activist Sarita Fratini.
“In the central Mediterranean, there is a line called the line of death,” Fratini told AFP.
“In the Libyan area, you get captured. In the north, you die because there is no one there.”
Fratini has been helping migrants sue Italy after they were seized in the Mediterranean by Libya and pushed back to detention centers there.
Rights activists and former detainees have denounced such centers for abuse, torture and other crimes.

- ‘Total anguish’ -

Irene Dea, 46, from Ivory Coast, told AFP she had tried to reach Europe three times by boat, with 12 people dying in the Mediterranean on her first attempt.
After Libyan forces pushed back her boat, she spent six months at the notorious Az-Zawiyah detention center west of Tripoli.
“I saw women being raped with my own eyes” there, she said. “You don’t eat... it was total anguish.”
NGOs have reported increasing episodes in recent months of Libya’s coast guard shooting at boats carrying migrants in the Mediterranean.
Last week, the Alarm Phone charity, which runs a hotline for migrants stranded in the Mediterranean, reported a fatal shooting at a boat it said was carrying 113 migrants southeast of Malta.
Italy’s coast guard also said migrants it subsequently rescued said they had been shot at.
If boats are not returned to Libya, migrants still have to survive the journey across the Mediterranean.
That crossing has cost the lives of more than 1,000 people so far this year, according to the International Organization for Migration.

- Rescue operation criticized -

On Friday, Italy’s coast guard said it was searching for the survivors of a wrecked vessel carrying about 30 people in the search and a rescue area of Malta, some 50 miles southeast of Lampedusa.
It said the coast guard had rescued seven people and another four were picked up by a nearby merchant ship.
One body was recovered, with Italian and Maltese patrol vessels and Italian planes taking part in the search.
The Italian coordinator for UNICEF, Nicola Dell’Arciprete, told AGI news agency that a pregnant woman had died and “several children are reported missing.”
He said four children traveling alone were among the survivors, who told authorities the small fiberglass boat had left Al Khums, Libya, before capsizing after two days at sea.
Sea-Watch International, which operates migrant rescue boats, criticized the rescue operation.
“Italy and Malta knew about the boat since yesterday afternoon, thanks to Alarm Phone, but did not send help until it was too late,” it said in a social media post Saturday.
Alarm Phone also said it had signalled the boat carrying about 35 people to the authorities, but “they failed to act.
“The boat capsized, we fear about 20 deaths. We cannot express our anger at yet another group consciously being left to die,” wrote Alarm Phone on social media.


Flights resume at Dhaka airport after fire forced operations to halt

Flights resume at Dhaka airport after fire forced operations to halt
Updated 15 sec ago

Flights resume at Dhaka airport after fire forced operations to halt

Flights resume at Dhaka airport after fire forced operations to halt
  • Operations at the Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport were suspended after the fire broke out in the cargo section of the airport, with around 37 firefighting units working to douse the flames

DHAKA: Flights have resumed at Bangladesh’s main airport in Dhaka, airport officials said, six hours after a fire in the cargo section delayed flights and halted operations on Saturday.
The first flight departed at 9.06 p.m. (1506 GMT), officials told reporters.
The fire has been completely brought under control, the Ministry of Civil Aviation and Tourism said in a statement.
“Steps will be taken to identify the source of the fire and implement measures to prevent such incidents in the future,” the ministry added.
Operations at the Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport were suspended after the fire broke out in the cargo section of the airport, with around 37 firefighting units working to douse the flames.
The army, navy, and air force also joined the fire service in efforts to bring the blaze under control.
Kabir Ahmed, president of the International Air Express Association of Bangladesh, said it was too early to estimate the exact losses, but that the overall impact — direct and indirect — on imports and exports could exceed $1 billion.
Both domestic and international flights were affected.
An IndiGo flight from Delhi to Dhaka was diverted to Kolkata, and an Air Arabia flight from Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates was directed to Chittagong, about 250 km (155 miles) southeast of Dhaka.
This is the third major fire reported in Bangladesh this week. A fire on Tuesday at a garment factory and an adjacent chemical warehouse in Dhaka killed at least 16 people and injured others. On Thursday, another fire burned down a seven-story garment factory building in an export processing zone in Chittagong.
The interim government said all recent fires across the country are under thorough investigation, with security forces working to protect lives and property.
It said any evidence of sabotage or arson would be met with a swift and decisive response and that no criminal act or provocation would be allowed to disrupt public life or the political process. 

 


Portuguese parliament approves bill banning face coverings in public

Portuguese parliament approves bill banning face coverings in public
Updated 18 October 2025

Portuguese parliament approves bill banning face coverings in public

Portuguese parliament approves bill banning face coverings in public
  • Measure proposed by far-right Chega party and would prohibit coverings such as burqas and niqabs being worn in most public places

MADRID: Portugal’s parliament on Friday approved a bill banning face veils worn for “gender or religious” reasons in public, in a move seen as targeting the face coverings worn by some Muslim women.

The measure was proposed by the far-right Chega party and would prohibit coverings such as burqas — a full-body garment that covers a woman from head to foot — and niqabs — the full-face Islamic veil with space around the eyes — from being worn in most public places. Face veils would still be allowed in airplanes, diplomatic premises and places of worship.

The bill stipulates fines for those wearing face veils in public ranging between 200 euros and 4,000 euros ($234 and $4,669).

President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa still has to approve the bill. He could veto it or send it to the Constitutional Court for review.

If signed into law, Portugal would join a number of European countries such as Austria, France, Belgium and the Netherlands who have full or partial bans on face and head coverings.

Not many women in Portugal wear such coverings, but the issue of Islamic veils has generated controversy similar to other European countries.

Chega cited France and other European Union countries’ rationales for banning face coverings commonly worn by Muslim women. The far-right Portuguese party received support for the bill from center-right parties.

In its bill, Chega said that hiding the face subjects individuals — especially women — “to situations of exclusion and inferiority” and was incompatible with principles such as “liberty, equality and human dignity.”

Lawmakers from left-leaning parties disagreed.

“This initiative is used solely to target foreigners, those who have a different faith,” said center-left Socialist Party lawmaker Pedro Delgado Alves whose party voted against the bill.

He said that while no woman should be forced to wear a veil, the far-right party’s approach was wrong.


UK Foreign Office staff promoted peer’s Israel trip despite downgrading of ties

UK Foreign Office staff promoted peer’s Israel trip despite downgrading of ties
Updated 18 October 2025

UK Foreign Office staff promoted peer’s Israel trip despite downgrading of ties

UK Foreign Office staff promoted peer’s Israel trip despite downgrading of ties
  • Former foreign secretary David Lammy had suspended trade talks days before visit by Ian Austin
  • Foreign Office pushed for the trip to go ahead in apparent contradiction of policy

LONDON: The UK Foreign Office recommended that David Lammy, the country’s foreign secretary at the time, endorse a trade mission to Israel in late May despite his earlier criticism of Tel Aviv’s conduct in Gaza.

Lammy had also suspended trade talks with Israel, yet Foreign Office staffers insisted that ministers should support the visit by Ian Austin, a pro-Israel peer, .

Austin’s trip went ahead despite lacking support from ministers or advisers as a result of bureaucratic dysfunction. Officials had earlier requested ministerial advice over the visit.

The Foreign Office said that Austin would not meet any Israeli government representatives while in the country, yet images show the peer meeting top trade officials on two occasions.

At a reception at the British Embassy attended by Austin, Israeli Minister Yoav Kisch also delivered a speech.

Lammy had suspended talks with Israel on a free trade agreement on May 20.

Despite this, a Foreign Office staffer, in a submission on the visit, said: “(British Embassy) Tel Aviv report that the business community in Israel are agitated by yesterday’s announcement. If we were to turn off this visit now, cancelling several visits and meetings, it would send a bad signal.”

Through the visit, Austin would be able “to explain to Israeli civil society and business … that nothing has changed in our existing trading relationship,” the briefing said, adding: “We recommend the visit goes ahead. Do you agree?”

A source told The Guardian that Lammy did not receive the submission.

On the Israel visit, Austin met officials from Rafael, the arms company that develops parts of the Iron Dome system and Spike missiles, which have been used in drone strikes that killed British aid workers in Gaza.

The British Embassy publicized details of Austin’s visit at the time.

It led to criticism of inconsistencies in foreign policy as it followed Lammy’s sharp rebuke of the Israeli government days earlier.

The apparent discrepancy will raise questions about the UK government’s relationship with Israel and its defense industry.