ֱ

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four
Smoke rises in the sky at the site of a Russian drone strike in Odesa, Ukraine on March 11, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 12 March 2025

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four
  • Attack late Tuesday came as Ukraine endorsed an American proposal for a 30-day ceasefire

KYIV: A Russian ballistic missile strike overnight on the southern Ukrainian port city of Odesa killed four people and damaged a Barbados-flagged cargo ship, Ukrainian authorities said Wednesday.
The attack late Tuesday came as Ukraine endorsed an American proposal for a 30-day ceasefire and agreed to immediate negotiations with Russia.
Ukrainian officials said the attack occurred as the cargo ship was being loaded with a grain consignment intended to be sent to Algeria.
“Unfortunately, four people died – citizens of Syria. The youngest victim was 18, the oldest was 24 years old. Two more people were wounded – a Ukrainian and a Syrian,” Oleksiy Kuleba, vice prime minister for reconstruction wrote on social media.
“Russia is attacking Ukraine’s infrastructure, including ports that are involved in ensuring the world’s food security,” he added.
Separately, the governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region said a 47-year-old woman was killed during a Russian missile attack on the central city of Kryvyi Rig, the hometown of President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The Ukrainian air force said that in total Russia had launched three missiles at the war-battered country overnight as well as 133 drones of various types, including the Iranian-designed Shahed-type attack drone.
Its air defense units shot down 98 of the drones, the air force added.


China hits US ships with retaliatory port fees before trade talks

Updated 10 sec ago

China hits US ships with retaliatory port fees before trade talks

China hits US ships with retaliatory port fees before trade talks
The fees would be applied on the same ship for a maximum of five voyages each year
The ministry also slammed the United States’ port fees as “discriminatory” that would “severely damage the legitimate interests of China’s shipping industry”

HONG KONG: China has hit US-owned vessels docking in the country with tit-for-tat port fees, in response to the American government’s planned port fees on Chinese ships, expanding a string of retaliatory measures before trade talks between US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
Vessels owned or operated by American companies or individuals, and ships built in the US or flying the American flag, would be subjected to a 400 yuan ($56) per net ton fee per voyage if they dock in China, China’s Ministry of Transport said on Friday.
The fees would be applied on the same ship for a maximum of five voyages each year, and would rise every year until 2028, when it would hike to 1,120 yuan ($157) per net ton, the ministry said.
They would take effect on Oct. 14, the same day when the United States is due to start imposing port fees on Chinese vessels.
China’s Ministry of Transport said on Friday in a statement that its special fees on American vessels are “countermeasures” in response to “wrongful” US practices, referring to the planned US port fees on Chinese vessels.
The ministry also slammed the United States’ port fees as “discriminatory” that would “severely damage the legitimate interests of China’s shipping industry” and “seriously undermine” international economic and trade order.
China has announced a string of trade measures and restrictions before an expected meeting between Trump and Xi on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in South Korea that begins at the end of October. On Thursday, Beijing unveiled new curbs on exports of rare earths and related technologies, as well as new restrictions on the export of some lithium battery and related production equipment.
The port fees announced by Beijing on Friday mirrors many aspects of the US port fees on Chinese ships docking in American ports. Under Washington’s plans, Chinese-owned or -operated ships will be charged $50 per net ton for each voyage to the US, which would then rise by $30 per net ton each year until 2028. Each vessel would be charged no more than five times per year.
China’s new port fee is “not just a symbolic move,” said Kun Cao, deputy chief executive at consulting firm Reddal. “It explicitly targets any ship with meaningful US links — ownership, operation, flag, or build — and scales steeply with ship size.”
The “real bite is on US-owned and operated vessels,” he said, adding that North America accounts for roughly 5 percent of the world fleet by beneficial ownership, which is still a meaningful figure although not as huge as compared to Greek, Chinese and Japanese ship owners.
However, the United States has only about 0.1 percent of global commercial shipbuilding market share in recent years and built fewer than 10 commercial ships last year, Reddal added.
While shipping analysts have said that the US port fees on Chinese vessels would likely have limited impact on trade and freight rates as some shipping companies have been redeploying their fleets to avoid the extra charge, shipping data provider Alphaliner warned last month in a report that the US port fees could still cost up to $3.2 billion next year for the world’s top 10 carriers.

Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal

Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal
Updated 13 min 43 sec ago

Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal

Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal
  • Coskun had set the religious book alight outside the Turkish consulate in London in February
  • Judge Bennathan told Southwark Crown Court that: “There is no offense of blasphemy in our law“

LONDON: A Turkish-born man who burned a Qur'an in London won an appeal on Friday against his conviction, in a ruling hailed by free-speech campaigners.
Hamit Coskun, 51, was found guilty in June of a religiously aggravated public order offense and was issued with a fine.
He had set the religious book alight outside the Turkish consulate in London in February while shouting slogans against Islam.
His case was taken up by the National Secular Society (NSS) and the Free Speech Union (FSU), who argued that Coskun was essentially being prosecuted for blasphemy.
Ruling in Coskun’s favor, judge Joel Bennathan told Southwark Crown Court on Friday that: “There is no offense of blasphemy in our law.”
“Burning a Qur'an may be an act that many Muslims find desperately upsetting and offensive,” according to the judge.
He said that the criminal law does not seek to “avoid people being upset, even grievously upset.”
“The right to freedom of expression, if it is a right worth having, must include the right to express views that offend, shock or disturb,” he added.
Blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008.
In a statement, Coskun, who is half-Kurdish and half-Armenian, said he came to England “having been persecuted in Turkiye, to be able to speak freely about the dangers of radical Islam.”
“I am reassured that, despite many troubling developments, I will now be free to educate the British public about my beliefs,” he added.
The FSU said the successful appeal sent a message that “anti-religious protests, however offensive to true believers, must be tolerated.”
Coskun has also received the support of the opposition Conservative party’s justice spokesperson Robert Jenrick.


France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears
Updated 25 min 30 sec ago

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears
  • Macron has set himself a deadline of Friday evening to name a new premier
  • France’s mainstream parties are keen to avoid a snap parliamentary election

PARIS: President Emmanuel Macron will convene a meeting of France’s mainstream political parties on Friday ahead of a self-imposed deadline to name a new prime minister, as the country’s central bank chief warned political turmoil was sapping economic growth.
Macron, 47, is searching for his sixth prime minister in under two years and will need to find a figure whose appeal spans the center-right to center-left in order to steer the budget for 2026 through a fragmented and fractious parliament.
Ahead of the meeting, the president’s Elysee office said the gathering needed to be a “moment of collective responsibility,” which political pundits quickly interpreted as a signal that Macron could call snap elections if no consensus candidate was found.

MACRON SETS FRIDAY EVENING DEADLINE TO NAME PM
Macron has set himself a deadline of Friday evening to name a new premier.
The daily Le Parisien newspaper reported that Macron intended to reappoint Sebastien Lecornu, who resigned as prime minister on Monday after just 27 days in the post, and that the president did not rule out a snap vote if other party leaders reject the proposal.
The Elysee did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Other names that have been floated in political circles include veteran centrist Jean-Louis Borloo, the head of the public auditor Pierre Moscovici, and Nicolas Revel, a technocrat who leads the Paris hospitals administration.

BUDGET WRANGLING HAS EXACERBATED POLITICAL CRISIS
Reappointing Lecornu would risk alienating the political leaders whose backing Macron needs to form a broad-based government that can get a budget over the line.
Wrangling over a budget that can both rein in the country’s deficit while meeting the conflicting demands of both the left and conservatives has been going on for weeks, with Socialist demands for a repeal of a 2023 pensions reform and for heavier taxation of the rich proving big stumbling blocks.
“People tell me: ‘He’s going to test the Lecornu 2 hypothesis on you.’ If that’s the case, I wish him good luck,” Green party chief Marine Tondelier told TF1 television.
Gabriel Attal, a former Macron prime minister and head of the president’s Renaissance party, cautioned the president against unilaterally naming the next premier without wider support.
“I fear that trying the same method ... of naming a prime minister before there has been a compromise will produce the same effects,” Attal said in an interview with France 2 television.
The meeting, due to take place from 1230 GMT, is excluding the far-right National Rally (RN) and hard-left France Unbowed (LFI) — two of the largest political parties in the National Assembly.
“The RN is honored not to have been invited. We are not for sale to those around Macron,” RN party chairman Bardella wrote on X.

SNAP ELECTION WOULD POSE RISKS FOR MAINSTREAM PARTIES
France’s mainstream parties are keen to avoid a snap parliamentary election. Opinion polls forecast the RN would be the main beneficiary and that another hung parliament dominated by three ideologically opposed blocs would be the most likely result.
The crisis is the deepest that France, the euro zone’s second-largest economy, has seen for decades. The turmoil was precipitated in part by the president’s failed gamble on a snap election last year that further weakened his minority in parliament.
The central bank chief, Francois Villeroy de Galhau, forecast the political uncertainty would cost the economy 0.2 percentage points of gross domestic product. Business sentiment was suffering but the economy was broadly fine, he said.
“Uncertainty is ... the number one enemy of growth,” Villeroy told RTL radio.
Villeroy said it would be preferable if the deficit did not exceed 4.8 percent of GDP in 2026. The deficit is forecast to hit 5.4 percent this year, nearly double the European Union’s cap.
Macron’s second-to-last prime minister, Francois Bayrou, was ousted by the National Assembly over his plans for 44 billion euros in savings to bring the deficit down to 4.6 percent.
Rating agencies issued a fresh round of warnings about France’s sovereign credit score this week after Lecornu said on Monday his government was resigning, just 14 hours after he had announced his cabinet line-up.


India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits
Updated 29 min 55 sec ago

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits
  • India, Afghanistan to revive air corridor for trade, bypassing land route through Pakistan
  • India signals willingness to return to previous representation level in Afghanistan, expert says

New Delhi: India will reopen its embassy in Kabul, Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said on Friday, in a meeting with his Afghan counterpart, Amir Khan Muttaqi, the first senior official from Afghanistan visiting New Delhi since the Taliban took power in 2021.

India closed its embassy when the Taliban took control four years ago, when Afghanistan’s Western-backed regime collapsed and US-led troops withdrew after two decades of military occupation.

Like all other countries, except for Russia, India also does not officially recognize Afghanistan’s Taliban administration, but in 2022, it opened what it called a “technical mission” to facilitate trade and humanitarian aid.

The mission will now be upgraded, Jaishankar told Muttaqi during their live-streamed meeting in New Delhi.

“Your visit marks an important step in advancing our ties and affirming the enduring friendship between India and Afghanistan,” he said.

 

 

“Closer cooperation between us contributes to your national development, as well as regional stability and resilience. To enhance that, I am pleased to announce today the upgrading of India’s technical mission in Kabul to the status of Embassy of India.”

Muttaqi arrived in India on Thursday. Like most Taliban leaders, he has been sanctioned by the UN, but the Security Council said last month that he was granted “an exemption to the travel ban” to visit New Delhi from Oct. 9 to 16.

“I’m happy today that I am here in Delhi and this visit will increase and strengthen the understanding between both countries and open a new chapter of these relations,” he said in the meeting with Jaishankar.

“During the American occupation, there were many ups and downs that happened. However, throughout this time, we never gave a statement against India, rather we always sought good relations with India. We will not allow any group to threaten anyone else or to use the territory of Afghanistan against others.”

In a statement after the meeting, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said that New Delhi agreed to “deepen its engagement” in developmental, healthcare and infrastructure projects in Afghanistan, as well as to offer scholarships to Afghan students to pursue studies at Indian universities.

The ministry also announced plans to increase economic engagement.

“The Afghan side invited Indian companies to invest in the mining sector which would help strengthen the bilateral trade and commercial relations,” it said.

“Both sides welcomed the commencement of the India-Afghanistan Air Freight Corridor, which will further enhance direct trade and commerce between the two countries.” 

The corridor is a trade initiative launched in 2017 under Afghanistan’s previous government to promote direct air cargo connectivity between the two countries, bypassing land routes that were often restricted due to political tensions, especially with Pakistan which lies between the two countries.

“I think India is certainly signaling that it is willing to consider moving towards the same level of representation as in the past, and changing the technical mission into a full embassy underscores that,” said Prof. Harsh V. Pant, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi.

“The important thing here is that both Taliban are willing to engage with India and make it very clear that they are interested in India having a larger economic role in Afghanistan.

“And India is also indicating that it does not want to be left out because other countries, in particular China, seem to be making a go at it ... It seems that this is certainly the beginning of a new phase of India’s engagement in Afghanistan.”


White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’
Updated 10 October 2025

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’
  • “The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace,” Cheung said
  • “President Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives”

WASHINGTON: The White House lashed out at the Norwegian Nobel Committee on Friday after it awarded the peace prize to Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado and overlooked US President Donald Trump.
“The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace,” White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung said on X.
“President Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives. He has the heart of a humanitarian, and there will never be anyone like him who can move mountains with the sheer force of his will.”


Since returning to the White House for his second term in January, Trump had repeatedly insisted that he deserved the Nobel for his role in resolving numerous conflicts — a claim observers say is broadly exaggerated.
Trump restated his claim on the eve of the peace prize announcement, saying that his brokering of the first phase of a ceasefire in Gaza this week was the eighth war he had ended.
But he added on Thursday: “Whatever they do is fine. I know this: I didn’t do it for that, I did it because I’ve saved a lot of lives.”
Nobel Prize experts in Oslo had insisted in the run-up to Friday’s announcement that Trump had no chance, noting that his “America First” policies run counter to the ideals of the Peace Prize as laid out in Alfred Nobel’s 1895 will creating the award.