ֱ

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader
President Donald Trump, center right, meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, at the White House in Washington on Feb. 28, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 02 March 2025

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader
  • White House blowout capped a week of largely futile efforts by US allies to steer Trump away from his flirtations with Moscow
  • Sen. Lindsey Graham said he had warned Zelensky before the meeting “not to take the bait” in his dealings with Trump

WASHINGTON: All it took was 90 seconds for weeks of tortured diplomacy to unwind in spectacular fashion.
President Donald Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday laid bare the limits of a full-court press by America’s allies aimed at reshaping Trump’s determination to end Russia’s invasion even if the terms are not to Ukraine’s liking.
It also stressed the profound ways Trump feels emboldened to redirect US foreign policy priorities toward his “America First” agenda in ways that extend well beyond those of his tumultuous first term.
The sudden blowup was the most heated public exchange of words between world leaders in the Oval Office in memory, as the usual staid work of diplomacy descended into finger-pointing, shouting and eye-rolling.
The encounter left the future of the US-Ukraine relationship, and Kyiv’s ability to defend itself in the brutal conflict with Russia, in mortal jeopardy.
“You either make a deal or we are out,” Trump told Zelensky, underscoring the American leader’s plans to dictate a swift end to the war or leave its longtime ally to continue the fight without its strongest backer.
Less than a day later, Zelensky used a series of posts on X to express his thanks to the American people, Trump and Congress for “all the support,” which he said Ukrainians “have always appreciated,” especially during the war.
“Our relationship with the American President is more than just two leaders; it’s a historic and solid bond between our peoples. That’s why I always begin with words of gratitude from our nation to the American nation,” he added. Ukrainians want “only strong relations with America, and I really hope we will have them,” he said.
Zelensky was in London to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer before a summit Sunday of European leaders.
Episode capped intense lobbying effort by American allies
The stunning episode in Washington had capped a week of what turned out to be largely futile efforts by US allies to paper over differences between Washington and Kyiv and to try to steer Trump away from his flirtations with Moscow.
On Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron huddled with Trump to lay the groundwork for an eventual European-led peacekeeping force in Ukraine aimed at deterring future Russian aggression and to encourage the US president to be more skeptical of Vladimir Putin.
But even as Trump and Macron greeted each other with a vise-like grip, the US was splitting with its European allies at the United Nations by refusing to blame Russia for its invasion of Ukraine in a series of resolutions marking the third anniversary of the war.
On Thursday, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited Washington and appealed to Trump for a US “backstop” for European nations who would provide front-line security for Ukraine. He was in essence looking for insurance that, should a peace deal be reached, Russia won’t restart the fighting in the future. Starmer brought flattery and a state visit invitation from King Charles III to soften the ask.
The approach seemed to work, as Trump struck a more conciliatory tone toward Ukraine, calling America’s support for the country against Russia’s invasion “a very worthy thing to do” and disclaiming any memory that he had called the Ukrainian leader a “dictator.”
But Trump also brushed aside Putin’s past broken diplomatic promises, claiming they occurred under different presidents, and saying the Russian leader had never violated a commitment to him. It came as his aides were planning a series of negotiating sessions with Russian officials to lay the groundwork for a potential meeting between Trump and Putin in the coming weeks.
Mineral deal pursued by Trump goes by the wayside, for now
All the while, Trump was focused on securing a financial stake in Ukraine’s critical minerals to recoup the tens of billions the US has given to Kyiv to defend itself. Zelensky, meanwhile, wanted more than Washington’s vague promises that the US would work to preserve its economic interest in Ukraine under the agreement and pushed for more concrete security guarantees.
But Trump would not budge, and US officials repeatedly said Zelensky would not be welcome to meet with the president to discuss Trump’s push for negotiations with Russia until it was signed. After weeks of browbeating, Zelensky’s government on Wednesday formally agreed to the proposal, clearing the path for Friday’s meeting.
It started off cordially enough, as Trump and Zelensky spoke politely, even with admiration, of one of another for the first half-hour of the meeting. Trump even suggested he would continue some military assistance to Ukraine until he could secure an enduring peace deal with Russia.
But when the Ukrainian leader raised alarm about trusting any promises from Putin to end the fighting, Vice President JD Vance rebuked him for airing disagreements with Trump in public. It instantly shifted the tenor of the conversation. Zelensky grew defensive, and Trump and his vice president blasted him as ungrateful and “disrespectful” and issued stark warnings about future American support.
A warning before the meeting ‘not to take the bait’
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a defense hawk and Trump ally, said he had warned Zelensky before the meeting “not to take the bait” in his dealings with Trump, who has repeatedly shown a penchant for throwing criticism but a deep resistance to receiving it.
It was Vance — a longtime critic of American support for Ukraine — who dangled it, when he insisted diplomacy was the only way forward.
“What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about?” Zelensky said, listing Russia’s past violations of ceasefires. “What do you mean?”
“I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country,” Vance responded before tearing into the Ukrainian leader. “Mr. President, with respect, I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media.”
Trump then let loose, warning the Ukrainian leader, “You’re gambling with World War III, and what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people say they should have.”
At another point, Trump declared himself “in the middle,” seeming to formally break from years of American support for Ukraine. He went on to deride Zelensky’s “hatred” for Putin as a roadblock to peace.
“You see the hatred he’s got for Putin,” Trump said. “That’s very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate.”
“It’s going to be a very hard thing to do business like this,” Trump said to Zelensky as the two leaders talked over each other.
Latest example of major shift in US foreign policy
The episode was just the latest instance of Trump’s brazen moves to shift long-held American policy positions in his first six weeks back in office, portending even more uncertainty ahead for longtime American allies and partners who have already felt pressed to justify their place in Trump’s eyes. It comes just weeks after Trump floated a permanent relocation of Palestinians in Gaza and an American takeover of the territory, and as he has doubled down on plans to put stiff tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada starting next week.
After the Oval Office dustup, Zelensky was asked to leave the White House by top Trump advisers — scrapping plans for a lunch, a joint press conference and the signing of the economic agreement, even as the Ukrainian leader and his aides pushed for a “reset” on the meeting.
Trump later told reporters he didn’t want to “embolden” the Ukrainian leader if he didn’t want “peace” with Russia — flipping what Ukraine had seen as an inducement for security guarantees into a cudgel.
“You can’t embolden somebody who does not have the cards,” Trump said.
After the disastrous encounter, Zelensky appeared on Fox News on Friday evening and told Bret Baier that his public spat with Trump and Vance was “not good for both sides.” But Zelensky said Trump — who insists Putin is ready to end the three-year grinding war — needs to understand that Ukraine can’t change its attitudes toward Russia on a dime.
Zelensky added that Ukraine won’t enter peace talks with Russia until it has security guarantees against another offensive.
“Everybody (is) afraid Putin will come back tomorrow,” Zelensky said. “We want just and lasting peace.”
“It’s so sensitive for our people,” Zelensky said. “And they just want to hear that America (is) on our side, that America will stay with us. Not with Russia, with us. That’s it.”
Zelensky acknowledged that without US support, his country’s position would grow “difficult.”
After repeatedly declining opportunities to apologize to Trump, Zelensky closed his Fox appearance with a sheepish expression of remorse as he struggled with the reality of Trump’s new direction in Washington: “Sorry for this.”


Anti-Muslim hate reports spike after right-wing rally, charity warns

Anti-Muslim hate reports spike after right-wing rally, charity warns
Updated 02 October 2025

Anti-Muslim hate reports spike after right-wing rally, charity warns

Anti-Muslim hate reports spike after right-wing rally, charity warns
  • In the 7 days after United the Kingdom rally, Tell Mama received 157 reports of anti-Muslim hate
  • ‘This comes at a time when real political leadership on this matter is missing’

LONDON: Anti-Muslim hate reports surged in the week following last-month’s right-wing Unite the Kingdom rally in London last month, charity Tell Mama has said, highlighting growing anxiety among Muslim and migrant communities.

The rally, held on Sept. 13, attracted over 150,000 people. In the seven days after, Tell Mama received 157 reports of anti-Muslim hate, with victims describing being told to “leave the UK” and “go back to your country.”

Between June and September, the charity recorded a total of 913 cases, including attacks on 17 mosques and Islamic institutions.

Tell Mama said the increase in reports following the rally appeared to be linked to “political discourse around migration,” and warned that such rhetoric is having a direct impact on the daily lives of Muslim communities.

Iman Atta, director of Tell Mama, described the figures as “shocking,” and warned that the full-year total could surpass last year’s record of more than 6,000 incidents.

“We are looking at a serious problem of anti-Muslim hatred that is pervasive in parts of our country. This comes at a time when real political leadership on this matter is missing,” she said.

The charity, which has monitored anti-Muslim hate for more than a decade, also confirmed it will no longer apply for government funding following an apparent dispute over resources.

Earlier this year, the British Muslim Trust was selected to receive investment from the new Combatting Hate Against Muslims Fund.

The BMT brings together the Aziz Foundation and Randeree Charitable Trust to analyze data and identify drivers behind the rise in anti-Muslim hatred across England.

Tell Mama said the surge in hate reports underscores a broader concern about how political narratives around migration are translating into harassment and abuse on the streets.

“The national debate around migration is having real-world impacts on the lives of people going about their daily activities,” the charity said.


Putin vows ‘significant’ response to ‘Europe’s militarization’

Putin vows ‘significant’ response to ‘Europe’s militarization’
Updated 02 October 2025

Putin vows ‘significant’ response to ‘Europe’s militarization’

Putin vows ‘significant’ response to ‘Europe’s militarization’
  • “Russia will never show weakness or indecisiveness,” Putin said

SOCHI: Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday promised a “significant” response to “Europe’s militarization,” as he addressed a foreign policy forum in southern Russia.
“We are closely monitoring the rising militarization of Europe,” he told the audience, adding: “Retaliatory measures by Russia will not take long. The response to such threats will be very significant.”
“Russia will never show weakness or indecisiveness,” Putin added.
Relations between Russia and the EU spiralled downward after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, leading the bloc to bolster its defense.
Drone incidents in Denmark and aerial incursions from Moscow in Estonia and Poland have heightened fears that Russia’s war on Ukraine could spill over Europe’s borders.
Putin accused Europe of stoking up “hysteria” to excuse rising military spending and said Russia wasn’t a threat. “Just calm down,” the Russian President said.


Gaza flotilla activist ‘disgusted’ by UK’s lack of intervention after Israeli interception

Gaza flotilla activist ‘disgusted’ by UK’s lack of intervention after Israeli interception
Updated 02 October 2025

Gaza flotilla activist ‘disgusted’ by UK’s lack of intervention after Israeli interception

Gaza flotilla activist ‘disgusted’ by UK’s lack of intervention after Israeli interception
  • UK’s PM accused of ‘moral bankruptcy’ for failing to act

LONDON: A British-Polish activist detained on board an aid flotilla bound for Gaza has accused the UK’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer of “moral bankruptcy” for failing to act after the vessel was intercepted by Israeli forces.

Ewa Jasiewicz, a journalist and campaigner who was also on the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla in which nine activists were killed, was among hundreds detained on Wednesday night when the Global Sumud Flotilla was stopped en route to the besieged territory.

from detention, Jasiewicz said: “I'm stunned that (Starmer) can be this morally and ethically bankrupt. Is this what being in power does to somebody? I’m not just baffled, I’m disgusted as well.”

Calling on the UK to intervene, she added: “I fully expect my MP to intervene on my behalf and to support civilian efforts to break the siege on Gaza. I expect full diplomatic and state efforts to lift this genocidal siege on Gaza.”

The Global Sumud Flotilla, made up of 44 boats carrying around 500 activists from more than 40 countries, set out with the aim of delivering aid to Palestinians in Gaza.

Among those taking part was Swedish activist Greta Thunberg. Tracking data shows at least one boat in the flotilla is still heading toward the territory.

Israeli authorities described the flotilla as an “initiative serving the terror group Hamas’ agenda,” accusations rejected by participants.

Jasiewicz said Israeli commandos boarded her vessel, the Sumud, “in a very violent way,” firing rubber bullets, using tasers and threatening activists.

She also claimed that detainees were humiliated once in custody, with soldiers filming them on their phones.

“It was not a good experience. It was scary, being on a vessel that was moving,” she said.

Jasiewicz compared the UK’s stance on Gaza with its support for Ukraine.

“I want to see the same legal and moral standards that states including the UK and Poland, my countries, rightly apply to the ongoing invasion and occupation of Ukraine,” she said.

“These double standards amount to racist hypocrisy and dehumanization of Palestinian lives.”

Her criticism carries particular weight given her history with the flotilla movement.

In 2010 she was traveling in a fleet of six ships raided by Israeli forces in a deadly confrontation that left nine activists dead, dozens injured and 10 Israelis wounded.

A UN investigation later found that at least six of the deaths were “in a manner consistent with an extra-legal, arbitrary and summary execution.”

In London, Camden Friends of Palestine has written to Starmer demanding he guarantee Jasiewicz’s safety, while campaigners have been planning a protest in Parliament Square.

The UK’s Foreign Office said it was “very concerned about the situation with the Sumud Flotilla” and is in contact with the families of those involved.

The Israeli military did not respond to a request for comment, according to The Independent.


Malaysia vows legal action against Israel’s ‘criminal’ abduction of Gaza flotilla crew

Reporters take photos of Malaysian participants of Global Sumud Flotilla after their confirmed abduction by Israel.
Reporters take photos of Malaysian participants of Global Sumud Flotilla after their confirmed abduction by Israel.
Updated 02 October 2025

Malaysia vows legal action against Israel’s ‘criminal’ abduction of Gaza flotilla crew

Reporters take photos of Malaysian participants of Global Sumud Flotilla after their confirmed abduction by Israel.
  • Malaysia loses contact with 23 citizens aboard Global Sumud Flotilla vessels
  • Israel’s conduct is ‘state piracy’: ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights co-chair

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia vowed on Thursday to take legal action against Israel after some 200 international activists, including Malaysian citizens, were abducted at sea as they carried aid for Gaza aboard the Global Sumud Flotilla.

The GSF mission, which involved representatives from 45 countries, carried over 400 people, including 34 Malaysians. It was scheduled to arrive at Gaza’s coast on Thursday afternoon, but the journey was disrupted after several vessels were intercepted by the Israeli navy.

Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that 12 citizens were taken in international waters while carrying lifesaving aid to Gaza and demanded their immediate and unconditional release.

It said that “the criminal and cowardly acts of aggression by Israeli forces against the Global Sumud Flotilla” constituted a “flagrant violation of international law, including international maritime law, international humanitarian law and international human rights law.”

Hours later, more Malaysians, who were aboard other boats, lost contact with their mission’s organizer, the Sumud Nusantara Command Center in Kuala Lumpur.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said in a series of X posts that 23 were missing and that he would take “all lawful and legally grounded measures to hold the Zionist regime accountable.”

Among the Malaysian nationals held by the Israeli military are popular singer Zizi Kirana and actress Ardell Aryana, who shared voice notes describing how Israelis tried to stop her boat by using water cannons.

“At first, they came in small groups and they gave a warning to stop, but we did not stop because our mission is to go straight to Gaza,” she said.

The capture of the flotilla crew has sent a wave of outrage across the country, where the mission to break Israel’s illegal blockade and starvation of Gaza is supported by both the government and the public.

Lavisha Sukumaran, a lawyer, recalled a video shared by a flotilla participant talking about how he was doing this for his children.

“He doesn’t want them to grow up in a world where people turn their backs on each other,” she said.

“It’s easy to talk about it, make social media posts about the genocide, participate in rallies, and all that. It takes a different kind of bravery to actually get to the group, risk your actual life, in hopes of making a change. It is so amazing and terrifying.”

For Dina Sallehudin, a content creator, the activists are “the bravest and kindest people, who are willing to risk their lives to make this mission happen.”

Some, like Ili Liyana Mokhtar, an editor, expected more action from the Malaysian government, including pressure on the ongoing UN General Assembly and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which it chairs this year.

“The Malaysian government has both a moral and diplomatic responsibility to act and act fast,” she told Arab News.

“The Sumud Flotilla wasn’t carrying weapons — it carried milk for babies, medicine for the sick, and food for the hungry. It carried hope ... It’s about standing up for basic human dignity. When children are starving, silence is not neutrality — it’s complicity.”

The ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights network’s co-chair, Charles Santiago, released a statement saying that Israel’s interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla was “nothing short of state piracy.”

He added that it “has no jurisdiction there, no legal grounds to detain civilians,” in international waters.

“It arrogantly hijacks a humanitarian mission, proving once again its utter disregard for international law,” Santiago said.

“The world cannot look away: silence is complicity, and every hour of inaction emboldens Israel’s criminal blockade of Gaza.”


Police confirm 134 arrested for supporting Palestine Action in London

Police confirm 134 arrested for supporting Palestine Action in London
Updated 02 October 2025

Police confirm 134 arrested for supporting Palestine Action in London

Police confirm 134 arrested for supporting Palestine Action in London
  • ‘Biggest ever mass action yet’ in support of banned group to take place this weekend
  • Further 66 people arrested at demo outside Labour Party conference in Liverpool

LONDON: The Metropolitan Police in London have said 134 people have been charged with allegedly supporting Palestine Action in the UK capital, The Independent reported.

It comes after 20 people became the latest to be charged under section 13 of the UK’s Terrorism Act for their part in demonstrations backing the proscribed group, which can carry a sentence of up to six months in prison.

The 20 were arrested on Aug. 9, and are due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Nov. 24.

Palestine Action was banned in the UK after several high-profile incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base that saw damage done to two military aircraft.

Protests in support of the group have subsequently been held across the country, with campaigners seeking to overwhelm police stations and courts through the number of people arrested and charged under the Terrorism Act, which forbids showing support for a banned group.

Defend Our Juries, the group organizing demonstrations for supporters of Palestine Action, said more than 1,500 people are set to take part in another protest in London this weekend. It said it will be “the biggest ever mass action yet defying the ban on Palestine Action.”

Earlier this week, 66 people were arrested for taking part in a protest outside the governing Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool.

Two were subsequently released, but the remaining 64 were taken into custody on suspicion of terrorism-related offenses.

A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: “If they can’t enforce the ban on their own doorstep, how do they expect to stop the biggest act of mass civil disobedience in Trafalgar Square this weekend?

“It’s nothing short of a scandal that thousands of people are being arrested — from vicars and priests to students and retired healthcare workers — as our fundamental rights to free speech and protest have been stripped away, not to keep us safe, but to protect weapons manufacturers’ interests and enable Israel to continue to slaughter Palestinian people.”