ֱ

Russian divers found dead near popular Philippines resort

Russian divers found dead near popular Philippines resort
Rescuers carry the body of one of two Russian scuba divers at Verde Island, Batangas city on Feb. 27, 2025. (Philippine Coast Guard Batangas via AP)
Short Url
Updated 28 February 2025

Russian divers found dead near popular Philippines resort

Russian divers found dead near popular Philippines resort
  • While three of the group were able to surface and return to the boat, the others were found by rescuers hours later
  • Shark attacks in the waters around the Philippines are exceedingly rare, with none recorded in at least a year

MANILA: Two Russian divers were found dead, one in the jaws of a shark, after a strong current separated them from their group in a popular Philippine scuba spot, a coast guard official said Friday.
Four Russian men aged 18 to 57 were diving Thursday afternoon near the resort area of Batangas on the main island of Luzon when they and their dive master were pulled apart by the current, coast guard district chief Airland Lapitan said.
While three of the group were able to surface and return to the boat, the others were found by rescuers hours later, according to Lapitan, who said the first man discovered was pronounced dead on arrival at a local hospital.
“The other one was found at about 4-5:30 p.m. (0800-0930 GMT Friday) and retrieved around 5-6 p.m.,” he said. “When the rescuers found him, he was being pulled by a shark. He was eventually retrieved but his arm was missing.”
It was unclear if the man had been killed by the shark or was already dead, Lapitan said, as the bodies were turned over to family members without an autopsy.
Shark attacks in the waters around the Philippines are exceedingly rare, with none recorded in at least a year, according to a global database.
The Russian embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Palestine Action prisoners say they face restrictions after group’s ban

Palestine Action prisoners say they face restrictions after group’s ban
Updated 17 sec ago

Palestine Action prisoners say they face restrictions after group’s ban

Palestine Action prisoners say they face restrictions after group’s ban
  • Those held on remand say they have been banned from wearing the keffiyeh

LONDON: Prisoners awaiting trial for alleged offenses linked to Palestine Action claim they have faced new restrictions since the group was proscribed earlier this year in the UK, a report in The Guardian said Saturday.

Those held on remand say they have been banned from wearing the keffiyeh, prevented from taking certain prison jobs, and in some cases had personal contacts removed from their call lists.

The restrictions have been applied despite the fact that none of the prisoners have been charged under terrorism legislation.

The UK’s Crown Prosecution Service has said, however, that their cases carry a “terrorism connection.”

Palestine Action, which has targeted sites of the Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems in the UK, was banned in July under the Terrorism Act.

The government said the decision was based on intelligence assessments, including one that cited “the use or threat of action involving serious damage to property.”

Teuta Hoxha, who is charged with criminal damage, aggravated burglary and violent disorder in relation to an action at Elbit Systems in Filton, near Bristol, said she was removed from her prison library job at HMP Peterborough following the proscription.

In a letter she received, the prison’s head of female services wrote: “In July 2025, the home secretary proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. The offences you are held on remand for are linked to Palestine Action and impact roles that are considered appropriate for you. The library orderly role is not considered appropriate.”

Hoxha, who recently staged a four-week hunger strike, said she also had a scarf she had knitted in the colours of the Palestinian flag confiscated.

She added that her sister had been taken off her call list because of her political views, after she and two other inmates connected to the Filton protest were categorized as terrorists by a joint extremism unit.

Audrey Corno, who is on bail awaiting two trials for alleged Palestine Action protests before the proscription, said: “She (Hoxha) was arrested in November 2024, way before proscription, so it’s completely banal for them to apply this retrospectively, and it’s completely punitive the way that they’re using this.”

Another defendant, Zoe Rogers, awaiting trial in the same case, said she was told a keffiyeh sent to her at HMP Bronzefield had been withheld “because it features branding associated with the Palestine Action Group.”

Supporters of Palestine Action say measures are being applied unfairly and retrospectively.

Sodexo, which runs HMP Peterborough, said it did not comment on individual cases but added: “We take our duty to ensure the safety of our prisons very seriously and will always act in line with national security guidance.”

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice added that all prisoners were subject to the same rules, saying: “Flags, symbols and other items that might threaten safety, order or security can be confiscated.”


18 dead, dozens missing in Nigeria mine collapse: local sources

18 dead, dozens missing in Nigeria mine collapse: local sources
Updated 27 September 2025

18 dead, dozens missing in Nigeria mine collapse: local sources

18 dead, dozens missing in Nigeria mine collapse: local sources
  • “We have managed to pull out 18 dead bodies from the pit,” Lawwali said
  • A dozen other miners were still trapped inside

GUSAU, Nigeria: Rescuers in Nigeria are searching for dozens of people missing after a boulder crashed onto an illegal mine during heavy rains, killing at least 18 people, local sources told AFP on Saturday.
The rock came crashing down on Thursday on the mine in the northern Zamfara state outside the Kadauri village in the Maru district, they said.
“We have managed to pull out 18 dead bodies from the pit and five other survivors who sustained various degrees of injuries,” Sani Lawwali, a miner who works in unauthorized pits, said from Kadauri.
A dozen other miners were still trapped inside and their fate remained unknown, said Lawwali, who took part in the rescue effort.
“The process is slow and laborious as we use our bare hands to chisel the end of the boulder to make holes for limited access into the pit,” he said.
Rescuers have asked for a bulldozer being used at a nearby road construction site to be brought in to help, but had not yet received a response from the company using it, Lawwali added.
Abubakar Nabube, a local community leader, confirmed the death toll of 18. He said that 15 of those killed came from the nearby Maikwanugga and Damaga villages.
“If no help comes from emergency agencies soon, none of those trapped would come out alive,” he said.
Zayyanu Ibrahim, a resident of Kadauri village said the collapse occurred at one of several newly dug sites in the recently established mining site.
“Dozens of miners were working in the pit while it heavily rained outside. A huge boulder at the mouth of the pit collapsed and buried miners inside,” said Ibrahim, who also confirmed the toll.
Sani Abdullahi, a councillor in the area, said it was difficult to say how many people there were in the pit at the time of the accident.
Officials from the Nigerian emergency agency NEMA did not respond to an AFP enquiry about the accident.
Zamfara, a poor agrarian state, is rich in gold deposits where illegal artisanal mining thrives in the countryside, despite several attempts by authorities to stop the practice.
The authorities have blamed illegal mining for the worsening of bandit violence, with criminal gangs getting money from protection fees they extort from miners.


Russian foreign minister: Any aggression against our country will be met with a ‘decisive response’

Russian foreign minister: Any aggression against our country will be met with a ‘decisive response’
Updated 27 September 2025

Russian foreign minister: Any aggression against our country will be met with a ‘decisive response’

Russian foreign minister: Any aggression against our country will be met with a ‘decisive response’
  • Lavrov spoke as unauthorized flights into NATO’s airspace have raised alarm around Europe
  • “Russia has never had and does not have any such intentions” of attacking European or NATO countries

UNITED NATIONS: Russia’s top diplomat insisted to world leaders Saturday that his nation has no intention of attacking Europe, but any aggression against his country “will be met with a decisive response.”
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke as unauthorized flights into NATO’s airspace — intrusions blamed on Russia — have raised alarm around Europe in recent weeks, particularly after NATO jets downed drones over Poland and Estonia said Russian fighter jets flew into its territory and lingered for 12 minutes.
Russia denied that its planes entered Estonian airspace and said the drones didn’t target Poland, with Moscow’s ally Belarus maintaining that Ukrainian signal-jamming sent the devices off course.
Lavrov instead maintained that it’s Russia that’s facing threats “Russia has never had and does not have any such intentions” of attacking European or NATO countries, he said. “However, any aggression against my country will be met with a decisive response.”


Trump asks Supreme Court to uphold restrictions he wants to impose on birthright citizenship

Trump asks Supreme Court to uphold restrictions he wants to impose on birthright citizenship
Updated 27 September 2025

Trump asks Supreme Court to uphold restrictions he wants to impose on birthright citizenship

Trump asks Supreme Court to uphold restrictions he wants to impose on birthright citizenship
  • The Justice Department’s petition has been shared with lawyers for parties challenging the order, but is not yet docketed at the Supreme Court
  • Any decision on whether to take up the case probably is months away and arguments probably would not take place until the late winter or early spring

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump ‘s administration is asking the Supreme Court to uphold his birthright citizenship order declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.
The appeal, shared with The Associated Press on Saturday, sets in motion a process at the high court that could lead to a definitive ruling from the justices by early summer on whether the citizenship restrictions are constitutional.
Lower-court judges have so far blocked them from taking effect anywhere. The Republican administration is not asking the court to let the restrictions take effect before it rules.
The Justice Department’s petition has been shared with lawyers for parties challenging the order, but is not yet docketed at the Supreme Court.
Any decision on whether to take up the case probably is months away and arguments probably would not take place until the late winter or early spring.
“The lower court’s decisions invalidated a policy of prime importance to the president and his administration in a manner that undermines our border security,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote. “Those decisions confer, without lawful justification, the privilege of American citizenship on hundreds of thousands of unqualified people.”
Cody Wofsy, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who represents children who would be affected by Trump’s restrictions, said the administration’s plan is plainly unconstitutional.
“This executive order is illegal, full stop, and no amount of maneuvering from the administration is going to change that. We will continue to ensure that no baby’s citizenship is ever stripped away by this cruel and senseless order,” Wofsy said in an email.
Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his second term in the White House that would upend more than 125 years of understanding that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment confers citizenship on everyone born on American soil, with narrow exceptions for the children of foreign diplomats and those born to a foreign occupying force.
In a series of decisions, lower courts have struck down the executive order as unconstitutional, or likely so, even after a Supreme Court ruling in late June that limited judges’ use of nationwide injunctions.
While the Supreme Court curbed the use of nationwide injunctions, it did not rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class-action lawsuits and those brought by states. The justices did not decide at that time whether the underlying citizenship order is constitutional.
But every lower court that has looked at the issue has concluded that Trump’s order violates or likely violates the 14th Amendment, which was intended to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship.
The administration is appealing two cases.
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco ruled in July that a group of states that sued over the order needed a nationwide injunction to prevent the problems that would be caused by birthright citizenship being in effect in some states and not others.
Also in July, a federal judge in New Hampshire blocked the citizenship order in a class-action lawsuit including all children who would be affected.
Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers who are in the country illegally, under long-standing rules. The right was enshrined soon after the Civil War in the first sentence of the 14th Amendment.
The administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship.


Controversy in Pakistan over unauthorized member of Islamabad’s UNGA delegation 

Controversy in Pakistan over unauthorized member of Islamabad’s UNGA delegation 
Updated 27 September 2025

Controversy in Pakistan over unauthorized member of Islamabad’s UNGA delegation 

Controversy in Pakistan over unauthorized member of Islamabad’s UNGA delegation 
  • Coverage of Dr. Shama Junejo at UN meeting went viral, sparking public uproar 
  • Foreign ministry says Junejo’s position behind defense minister did not have official approval

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government has come under public scrutiny over the presence of a researcher in Islamabad’s delegation at this week’s UN General Assembly in New York, as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied approving her attendance.  

Dr. Shama Junejo, a Pakistani researcher based in London, was seen sitting behind Defense Minister Khawaja Asif during a Security Council debate this week in videos and photos that have since gone viral on social media, with critics highlighting Junejo’s track record of supporting Israel.  

Given Pakistan’s staunch support of Palestine, Junejo’s presence near Asif at the UN caused an uproar among Pakistanis, prompting the minister to reaffirm his support for Palestine in a post on X on Friday. 

He said he did not know the woman sitting behind him in the footage, but that her presence would have been authorized at the discretion of the foreign ministry. 

“To clarify, the individual in question was not listed in the official letter of credence for the Pakistan delegation to the 80th UNGA Session, signed by the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister,” Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on X on Saturday.

“Her seating behind the Defense Minister did not have the approval of the Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister.”  

Pakistan does not recognize Israel and has steadfastly supported an independent Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also reiterated Islamabad’s stance during his address at the UNGA on Friday.

But in less than a day, the foreign ministry’s statement had garnered more than 1.3 million views and thousands of reactions on X, as users questioned the official clarification and highlighted Junejo’s previous claims of being affiliated with the government and flying on the official government jet. 

In a now-deleted post on X, Junejo wrote on Sept. 21 that she has been working as an adviser to Sharif since May 2025. The researcher has also been photographed in the past with the premier, his elder brother and three-time former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz and Defense Minister Asif. 

In August 2022, she wrote online that meeting Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu “would have been an honor” and that she would have used a photo with him as her profile picture. She has also previously praised Israeli technology, including drip irrigation, suggesting it could benefit regions like Sindh and southern Punjab.

But the researcher said she joined others in leaving the UNGA during Netanyahu’s speech on Friday. 

“We walked out from UNGA when the war criminal Netanyahu entered,” Junejo wrote on X.

Asad Qaiser, a former speaker of the lower house of Pakistan parliament, said the defense minister and the foreign ministry were lying, and demanded answers regarding who allowed Junejo to travel in a Pakistani plane from London to New York, sit in an official Pakistani government seat behind Asif at the UNSC, and enabled her to attend UN sessions.

“These questions are extremely important … Most importantly she has been meeting Israeli diplomats and is known for her support (of) Israel,” he said. 

“This is an extremely grave situation that the PM himself must explain.”

-ENDS-