ֱ

Taiwan sends forces in response to China ‘live-fire’ drills off island

Taiwan sends forces in response to China ‘live-fire’ drills off island
A Taiwanese Air Force Mirage 2000 fighter jet prepares to land at an Air Force base in Hsinchu on December 10, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 26 February 2025

Taiwan sends forces in response to China ‘live-fire’ drills off island

Taiwan sends forces in response to China ‘live-fire’ drills off island

TAIPEI: Taiwan sent forces on Wednesday in response to China’s “live-fire” drills off the self-ruled island, Taipei’s defense ministry said, condemning the exercises as dangerous.
China deployed 32 aircraft near Taiwan as part of a joint combat drill with Chinese warships and announced “live-fire exercises” in an area about 40 nautical miles (74 kilometers) off the island’s south, the ministry said in a statement.
Taiwan’s military responded by sending sea, air and land forces to “monitor, alert and respond appropriately,” the statement said.
China’s People’s Liberation Army “has blatantly violated international norms by unilaterally designating a drill zone 40 NM off the coast of Kaohsiung and Pingtung, claiming to conduct live-fire exercises without prior warning,” the ministry said.
“This move not only caused a high degree of danger to the safety of international flights and vessels at sea, but is also a blatant provocation to regional security and stability.”
Taiwan has naval and air bases in Kaohsiung and Pingtung.
China has ramped up the deployment of fighter jets and warships around Taiwan in recent years to press its claim of sovereignty over the island, which Taipei rejects.
Taiwan’s defense ministry said China’s move “is completely contrary to its repeated claims of ‘peaceful coexistence’ principles” and vowed to “continue our efforts in force buildup and readiness.”
Beijing’s foreign ministry declined to comment on Taiwan saying China has set up a drill zone for “shooting training.”
“This is not a question on foreign affairs,” spokesman Lin Jian told reporters.
China’s defense ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment from AFP.

Taipei’s defense ministry said China’s actions in the region, including live-fire drills off Australia and Vietnam, “prove that China is the only and biggest threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and the Indo-Pacific region.”
The drills also come after Taiwan seized a Chinese-crewed cargo ship on Tuesday suspected of severing a subsea telecoms cable serving Taiwan’s Penghu island group.
There is growing concern in Taiwan over the security of its cables after a Chinese-owned cargo ship was suspected of cutting one northeast of the island this year.
China’s Communist Party has never ruled democratic Taiwan but Beijing has threatened to use force to bring the island under its control.
Taiwan fears China could sever its communication links as part of an attempt to seize the island or to blockade it.
Taiwan is also a potential flashpoint for a war between China and the United States, which is the island’s most important backer and biggest arms supplier.
While the United States is legally bound to provide arms to Taiwan, Washington has long maintained “strategic ambiguity” when it comes to whether it would deploy its military to defend it from a Chinese attack.
Despite strong bipartisan support in the US Congress for Taiwan, there are fears that President Donald Trump might not consider the island worth defending if China attacked.
Taiwan President Lai Ching-te has already vowed to boost investment in the United States to reduce the trade imbalance and spend more on the island’s military, while his government is also considering increasing US natural gas imports.
Beijing regards Lai as a “separatist” and has staged several rounds of major military exercises since he came to power last May.
The dispute between Beijing and Taipei dates back to the civil war between Mao Zedong’s communist fighters and Chiang Kai-shek’s nationalist forces, which fled to Taiwan in 1949 following their defeat.


Alleged Kirk killer had ‘leftist’ beliefs, Utah governor says

Alleged Kirk killer had ‘leftist’ beliefs, Utah governor says
Updated 24 sec ago

Alleged Kirk killer had ‘leftist’ beliefs, Utah governor says

Alleged Kirk killer had ‘leftist’ beliefs, Utah governor says
WASHINGTON: The man arrested over conservative influencer Charlie Kirk’s assassination was romantically involved with a transgender roommate and had “leftist ideology,” Utah’s governor said Sunday, confirming details likely to inflame the contentious national debate over the killing.
“Yes I can confirm that,” Governor Spencer Cox told CNN’s “State of the Union” talk show when asked about suspect Tyler Robinson’s reported relationship with a trans partner.
“The roommate was a romantic partner, a male transitioning to a female,” Cox said.
“This partner has been incredibly cooperative, had no idea that this was happening, and is working with investigators right now,” he added.
Cox, who said 22-year-old Robinson is expected to be formally charged Tuesday, went on to stress it was not yet clear whether the partner’s transitioning was part of the alleged shooter’s mindset to kill Kirk, a close ally of US President Donald Trump.
“Again, all of these things — we’re trying to figure out,” he said.
Cox, who earned plaudits this past week for urging Americans to lower the toxic political temperature, made the rounds of US networks Sunday and told NBC talk show “Meet the Press” that investigators believed Robinson had embraced leftist beliefs.
“There clearly was a leftist ideology with this — with this assassin,” Cox said.
He said such information about Robinson, who has not been cooperating, was told to investigators by “people around him, from his family members and friends.”
Several US media outlets on Saturday reported Robinson’s relationship with a transgender individual, sparking fury by far-right activists for whom gender identity issues have been a key focus in recent years.
Laura Loomer, a conservative influencer who has Trump’s ear, called Saturday “to designate the Trans movement as a terrorist movement,” while X-owner Elon Musk elevated multiple posts calling for gender treatment bans and denouncing leftist ideology.
On Saturday he went further, telling a London march organized by far-right activists that “the left is the party of murder.”
Cox meanwhile reiterated a call for civility across the political spectrum, while attacking social media giants by comparing their addictive algorithms to the deadly drug fentanyl.

- ‘Trans delusion’ -

Kirk was shot Wednesday during a speaking event on a Utah university campus. He was the founder of the conservative youth political group Turning Point USA and was a strong critic of the transgender rights movement.
He wrote on X about what he called a “trans delusion death cult” in August, shortly after two children were killed and nine others wounded at a school church shooting in Minneapolis by an assailant authorities say was a 23-year-old man who claimed to be transgender.
Kirk’s provocations have stirred debate. He often invoked his Christian faith and criticized what he and others have called gender ideology.
In a video posted in 2023 by Right Wing Watch, Kirk is seen describing individuals being transgender to a church audience as “a throbbing middle finger to God.”
With debate raging over what inspired Kirk’s murder, a member of former president Joe Biden’s cabinet, Pete Buttigieg, stressed there was “not a consistent pattern of left versus right among the shooters” in recent high-profile attacks, noting that Minnesota Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed in June.
“We have to reject anyone who would try to exploit political violence,” Buttigieg told NBC.
“The response to this cannot be for the government to crack down on individuals or groups because they challenge the government politically.”
Turning Point USA announced that a memorial service for Kirk will take place in a football stadium near Phoenix, Arizona on September 21, which Trump is expected to attend.

Romania summons Russian ambassador over drone ‘threat’

Romania summons Russian ambassador over drone ‘threat’
Updated 20 min ago

Romania summons Russian ambassador over drone ‘threat’

Romania summons Russian ambassador over drone ‘threat’
  • Bucharest strongly condemns entry of a Russian drone into its airspace during attack on Ukraine
  • Comes after Nato member Poland said it had shot down Russian drones

BUCHAREST: Romania on Sunday strongly condemned the entry of a Russian drone into its airspace during an attack on neighboring Ukraine, with the foreign ministry summoning Moscow’s ambassador over the incident.
The incursion comes days after fellow NATO member Poland said it had shot down Russian drones which had violated its airspace as Moscow launched a barrage against Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused the Kremlin of “testing” Romania and wanting to “bring the war” to Poland and the Baltic with the intrusions.
Earlier on Sunday, NATO member Romania had said that Moscow’s actions pose a “new challenge” to Black Sea security.
Foreign Minister Oana Toiu also announced that Russia’s ambassador to Bucharest, Vladimir Lipaev, would be summoned over Saturday’s drone incident to the ministry.
After the meeting on Sunday evening, the ministry said in a statement that Romania had “conveyed its strong protest against this unacceptable and irresponsible act, which constitutes a violation of (its) sovereignty.”
“Such recurring incidents contribute to the escalation and amplification of threats to regional security,” said the statement, adding that Moscow was “urgently requested... to prevent any future violations.”
Poland had already denounced the intrusion of Russian drones into its airspace, calling on Moscow to avoid further “provocations.” Polish fighter jets scrambled Saturday in response to fresh Russian drone strikes just over the border in Ukraine.
Romania has had several drone fragments crash on its territory since Moscow sent troops into Ukraine, especially as Russia has stepped up attacks on Ukrainian ports.
In a statement, Romania’s defense ministry said it “strongly condemns the irresponsible actions of the Russian Federation and emphasizes that they represent a new challenge to regional security and stability in the Black Sea area.”
It added that “such incidents demonstrate the Russian Federation’s lack of respect for international law.”
In his evening address on Sunday, Zelensky repeated his argument that Russia was seeking to expand its invasion of his country.
“Everyone can see that the Russians are exploring how to bring the war to Poland and the Baltic states. The Russian army is also testing Romania,” the Ukrainian leader said.
The European Union’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas called the Russian action a “reckless” threat to security.
“The violation of Romanian airspace by Russian drones is yet another unacceptable breach of an EU member state’s sovereignty,” Kallas wrote on X.
“This continued reckless escalation threatens regional security. We stand in solidarity with Romania. I am in close contact with the Romanian government.”
Russia has not yet commented since Romania reported late Saturday that its airspace had been breached by a drone during a Russian attack in neighboring Ukraine, but has denied targeting Poland.
Romania scrambled two F-16 fighter jets, which “detected a drone in national airspace” and tracked it until it dropped off the radar, the defense ministry said.
In its statement Sunday, the ministry said that a “Geran drone used by” Russia had entered Romanian airspace.
It added that the drone “orbited for about 50 minutes, from northeast of (the village of) Chilia Veche to southwest of Izmail, and left national airspace near the town of Pardina, heading toward Ukraine.”
Romania’s fighter jets were “supported by German allies... with two Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft,” which monitored the situation.
The drone did not fly over populated areas and did not pose an imminent threat to the safety of the population, said the statement.
Toiu said on X that she will “raise Russia’s actions at (the) UN General Assembly, urging a strict international adherence to sanctions.”
In February, the Romanian parliament adopted a law allowing the country to shoot down drones breaching its airspace.


Vuelta final stage cancelled amid huge pro-Palestinian protest

Vuelta final stage cancelled amid huge pro-Palestinian protest
Updated 33 min ago

Vuelta final stage cancelled amid huge pro-Palestinian protest

Vuelta final stage cancelled amid huge pro-Palestinian protest
  • Various stages of the Vuelta had been shortened because of protests, largely against the Israel-Premier Tech team’s participation
  • Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Sunday said pro-Palestinian protests that have rocked the Vuelta a Espana in Madrid filled him with “pride”

MADRID: The final stage of the Vuelta a Espana was cancelled on Sunday because of huge pro-Palestinian protests in Madrid.
Thousands of protesters gathered in the Spanish capital, invading the course where the race was due to pass in the center of Madrid, AFP journalists witnessed.
On Gran Via, where cyclists were due to pass multiple times, protesters knocked down barriers and marched into the road, some chanting for a boycott of Israel as green and red smoke filled the air.
Near Atocha, Madrid’s central train station, police charged demonstrators and fired tear gas, before letting them walk into the road.
Riders, around 56 kilometers from the finish of the race, came to a halt before the Vuelta was abandoned.
Various stages of the Vuelta had been shortened because of protests, largely against the Israel-Premier Tech team’s participation.
The protests have also led to moments of tension in the three-week grand tour, including crashes.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said before racing began on Sunday that the protests have filled him with “pride.” He expressed his “recognition and full respect for the athletes, but also our admiration for a people like Spain’s which mobilizes for just causes, like Palestine.”

“Spain today shines as an example and as a source of pride, an example to an international community where it sees Spain taking a step forward in the defense of human rights,” he told a Socialist party gathering in Malaga.
Several members of Spain’s leftist government have publicly supported the movement in a country where backing for the Palestinian cause is strong.
Authorities ramped up security for the final stage in Madrid ahead of the expected large protests but could not stop the race from being abandoned.


UK military academy bans Israelis over actions in Gaza

UK military academy bans Israelis over actions in Gaza
Updated 14 September 2025

UK military academy bans Israelis over actions in Gaza

UK military academy bans Israelis over actions in Gaza
  • The Ministry of Defence said that military educational courses are open to personnel from various countries, emphasizing adherence to international humanitarian law
  • The exclusion of Israelis from the college is the first since its establishment in 1927, and it comes as the latest punitive measure against Israel 

LONDON: One of the UK’s most prestigious defense academies has banned Israelis from enrolling in its program due to Tel Aviv’s military actions in the Gaza Strip, which some EU officials have recently described as genocidal acts.

Starting next year, the Royal College of Defence Studies will not be accepting students from Israel, the UK government confirmed on Sunday.

The college has promoted understanding among military officers, diplomats, civil servants, and officials for almost a century. Each year, about 110 members from the UK and abroad join its program. Notable alumni include Field Marshall Alan Francis Brooke and former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.

According to The Telegraph, the college’s postgraduate course in international strategic studies focuses on “political, diplomatic, security, social and economic issues at the grand strategic level — the level at which governments take decisions on these issues both nationally and within the international community.”

However, its main course is “practical rather than theoretical.”

The exclusion of Israelis from the college is the first since its establishment in 1927, and it comes as the latest punitive measure against Israel taken by the UK government over its massacres in Gaza.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said that British military educational courses are open to personnel from various countries, emphasizing adherence to international humanitarian law.

He added: “However, the Israeli government’s decision to further escalate its military operation in Gaza is wrong.

“There must be a diplomatic solution to end this war now, with an immediate ceasefire, the return of the hostages and a surge in humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza.”

The UK government banned Israeli officials from attending the UK’s largest arms exhibition last week.

It also pledged to recognize Palestinian statehood in the UN General Assembly later this month, unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in the Palestinian coastal enclave of Gaza and commits to not annexing the West Bank.

In August, Israeli forces launched a new military campaign to occupy Gaza City and its surrounding areas, where approximately 1 million Palestinians live and seek shelter. Forces launched dozens of airstrikes targeting high-rise buildings in the city, resulting in the deaths and injuries of hundreds of people, and the displacement of nearly 250,000 others.

On Friday, 142 countries at the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution supporting “tangible, time-bound, and irreversible steps” toward a two-state solution. On Sept. 23, the annual general debate at the assembly will begin, with French President Emmanuel Macron expected to recognize the state of Palestine.


New strain in ties as Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of aiding militants, experts warn

An Afghan security personnel member stands guard at a fenced corridor of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak district
An Afghan security personnel member stands guard at a fenced corridor of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak district
Updated 14 September 2025

New strain in ties as Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of aiding militants, experts warn

An Afghan security personnel member stands guard at a fenced corridor of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak district
  • 19 soldiers killed in clashes with militants in Pakistan’s northwest
  • Pakistani PM Shehbaz Sharif says ‘terrorists come from Afghanistan’

KABUL: The Pakistani prime minister’s accusations of Afghan involvement in cross-border attacks are likely to further strain relations between the two neighbors, experts say, after 19 soldiers were killed in clashes in Pakistan’s northwest this week.

Over the past few days, Pakistani security forces have reported several raids in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province on what it said were hideouts of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan — an outlawed armed group, which is separate from the Afghan Taliban.

After the military said on Saturday the clashes with the militants killed at least 19 soldiers and 45 fighters, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif told reporters in Bannu, one of the districts where the attacks took place, that “terrorists come from Afghanistan” and that Pakistan “will have nothing to do” with the Afghan administration if it chooses to support them.

While there has been no immediate reaction from Kabul to the Pakistani prime minister’s statements, they marked “an escalation in hostile rhetoric toward Afghanistan,” Ahmed-Waleed Kakar, analyst and founder of the Afghan Eye podcast, told Arab News.

Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 2021, Pakistan has been accusing them of allowing TTP militants to use Afghan territory for cross-border attacks — a claim the Taliban have repeatedly denied.

“Kabul has routinely dismissed the allegations against it as being Islamabad’s attempts at distracting from its own ‘internal problems,’” Kakar said.

Similar allegations were made even before the Taliban took over the country following the collapse of its Western-backed government of Ashraf Ghani.

“The same accusation was used in part to justify building a towering security fence along a historically porous frontier that, according to Pakistan’s own and contemporary statements, has abjectly failed to provide the security it was touted to,” Kakar said.

“(That) development illustrates how closely intertwined Pakistan’s historically tense relationship with Afghanistan is with its own precarious and increasingly fragile domestic stability.”

When the Pakistani prime minister made similar accusations against Afghanistan in April, Hamdullah Fitrat, Taliban deputy spokesman, said Kabul should not be held responsible for Islamabad’s “failed policies” and that it did not permit any group to use Afghan soil for “any activity or operation against Pakistan.”

Afghan-Pakistani relations reached a new low after a wave of deadly suicide bombings in Pakistan two years ago. Islamabad blamed them on TTP and, as violence mounted, started deporting undocumented foreigners, mostly Afghans, saying that the high number of refugees posed risks to national security.

Over the past two years, 1.4 million Afghan nationals have been expelled, deepening a humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan, which is struggling to accommodate the sudden influx of people.

“Islamabad is trying to justify the mass deportations by alleging refugee involvement in destabilizing activities — a claim that lacks sufficient substantiation,” said Naseer Ahmad Nawidy, political science professor at Salam University in Kabul.

“Further escalation of tensions serves no purpose. Both nations require economic development, regional connectivity, and constructive relations with the international community. Ongoing hostility only harms the broader region.”