ֱ

Frankly Speaking: Is a Palestinian state more remote than ever?

Short Url
Updated 23 February 2025

Frankly Speaking: Is a Palestinian state more remote than ever?

Frankly Speaking: Is a Palestinian state more remote than ever?
  • Riyad Mansour rejects forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, wants Israeli PM Netanyahu to face justice at ICC for war crimes
  • The permanent observer of Palestine to the UN says the PA appreciates “ֱ’s principled position on statehood”

DUBAI: Riyad Mansour, permanent observer of Palestine to the UN, has strongly rejected any proposal to eject the Palestinian population from Gaza to Jordan and Egypt, reaffirming the Palestinian people’s right to rebuild their homeland and establish a state of their own.

Appearing on the Arab News current affairs program “Frankly Speaking,” Mansour also praised ֱ’s support for Palestinian sovereignty, accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of war crimes, and outlined the role of the Palestinian Authority in Gaza’s future.

The controversial proposal floated by US President Donald Trump to take control of Gaza and relocate Palestinians to Jordan and Egypt has been met with outright rejection by regional leaders.

King Abdullah II of Jordan, the first Arab leader to meet Trump in Washington since he began his second term, made it clear that Amman would not accept any forced transfer of Palestinians. Instead, Jordan agreed to take in 2,000 critically ill Palestinian children for medical treatment.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

Mansour highlighted the unified Arab stance against any forced displacement of Palestinians. “The King (Abdullah II) put on his X account that the Kingdom (of Jordan) is against the transfer of the Palestinians outside of the Gaza Strip,” he told “Frankly Speaking” host Katie Jensen.

“Their position is very firm in order to see the ceasefire holding and the implementation of the agreement. He said that there is no solution except the two-state solution and readiness of Jordan and the Arabs to work with the Trump administration for accomplishing these objectives.”

Following Trump’s remarks earlier this month in which he announced his intention to take over Gaza and remove its Palestinian population, ֱ issued a strong statement reaffirming Palestinian sovereignty.

“The Kingdom affirms that the Palestinian people have a right to their land, and they are not intruders or immigrants to it who can be expelled whenever the brutal Israeli occupation wishes,” ֱ’s Foreign Ministry posted on X. Similar strong statements on the issue have been issued by the Kingdom since then.




Riyad Mansour, permanent observer of Palestine to the UN, during his appearance on the “Frankly Speaking” current affairs show. (AN Photo)

Mansour praised ֱ’s swift and firm stance. “I was not surprised,” he said. “We work very closely with our brothers in ֱ at all kinds of levels. We are on the same page, that the question of Palestine and the rights of the Palestinian people should be recognized.”

He also highlighted the role of the Arab Peace Initiative, first proposed by ֱ in 2002, in shaping the international response to Palestinian statehood. “We appreciate all these principled, very powerful, and strong positions of ֱ,” he said.

“And I believe all of the Arab countries are on the same page with ֱ in order to push back against those who want... to finish the national aspirations of the Palestinian people.”

Netanyahu, currently facing corruption charges that could lead to a 10-year prison sentence, has come under further scrutiny for his handling of the war in Gaza. Many critics believe his political survival hinges on prolonging the conflict.

Mansour was unequivocal about Netanyahu’s legal and moral accountability. “At the global (level), he is also an international wanted criminal by the ICC. There is a warrant for his arrest as a war criminal and he has to face justice in that International Criminal Court.”

The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on Nov. 24, accusing him of using starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population, and of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts — accusations he has rejected.

Similar warrants were issued for Yoav Gallant, Israel’s former minister of defense, and for Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, who was reportedly killed in an Israeli airstrike on July 13, 2024.

While leaving Israeli domestic matters to their citizens, Mansour stressed that the international community must pursue justice for the atrocities committed in Gaza. “The international community will deal with him as a wanted international criminal in The Hague and the ICC.”

Asked whether the conflict in Gaza and the threatened exile of the Palestinian people would have happened had Hamas not committed the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel, or if it had agreed to hand over the hostages taken in that attack much sooner, Mansour said nothing justified the “genocidal war” Israel had mounted against civilians.

“The history of the Palestine question did not start on Oct. 7,” he said. “And regardless of what happened on Oct. 7, there is no justification whatsoever for the genocidal war committed against the Palestinian civilians.”

Since the war began, some 64,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to some estimates, while at least 110,000 have been injured, thousands of children orphaned, and countless more having lost limbs in Israel’s bombardment of the enclave.




A Palestinian man stands amidst the rubble of buildings destroyed during the Israeli offensive, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on February 16, 2025. (Reuters)

“These crimes cannot be justified for any reason whatsoever under international law, under morality, under humanity,” said Mansour.

“So therefore, those who are trying to justify this massive amount of killing, because of what happened on Oct. 7, there is no justification for what they did, and those criminals who gave the order to commit these crimes against the Palestinian people, especially the children and women, should face justice and they should receive the punishment that they deserve.”

With ongoing speculation over who will govern Gaza after the war, which has been paused since the ceasefire deal of Jan. 19, Mansour insisted that the Palestinian Authority remains the legitimate government of the State of Palestine.

“We have a legitimate government and we have the recognition of the international community and the Arab official systems of the government of the State of Palestine and the Palestine Liberation Organization as the representative of the Palestinian people,” he said.

He outlined the PA’s responsibility in ensuring governance in Gaza after the war. “Now, those who have this legitimacy, they have also the responsibility to shoulder their responsibilities in terms of doing what needs to be done in the Gaza Strip.”

Mansour pointed to a detailed plan presented by Egypt and shared with the UN, which supports PA governance as a key component of regional peace efforts.

“The legitimate government, which is acceptable by the international community, is the party that’s supposed to be dealing with its full power in terms of its responsibilities in the Gaza Strip,” he said.

Ahmed Aboul Gheit, secretary-general of the Arab League, suggested in a recent interview with Al Arabiya that Hamas should step aside if it serves Palestinian interests.

Asked whether the group should relinquish power, Mansour emphasized the need for Palestinian self-determination.

“We have a lot of issues to deal with internally in the Palestinian house,” he said. “And I believe that we should be left to deal with these issues internally.”

He added that once a permanent ceasefire is in place, internal Palestinian matters can be addressed. “Once we succeed in putting an end to this war and make the ceasefire permanent, there are a lot of things that we need to deal with internally,” he added.

Trump’s suggestion that many Palestinians would rather leave Gaza permanently has been widely condemned by Arab leaders. Mansour dismissed the claim, pointing to the recent return of hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians to their war-ravaged homes in the north of Gaza.




During the interview with Katie Jensen (L), Mansour praised ֱ’s swift and firm stance on the Palestinian issue. (AN Photo)

“The answer was given by our people who marched in two days, in the span of a few hours, by marching from the south to the north in more than 450,000 people,” he said.

“They knew that they were going back to destroyed homes and properties, but loving the land and the place where you were born and where you have memories and you have dreams, it is so valuable to us. It is in our DNA as Palestinians.”

Mansour reaffirmed that the Palestinian people will never accept forced displacement.

“The answer came from those who marched on their feet, not even by vehicle, from the south to the north, old, young, all of them going back to these places. So that is the answer of those of our people whom some say that they have no choice but to leave. No, they have a choice.

“They are returning to the place that they cherish and love. This is the meaning of why do people fight for their national homelands? Why do they defend it with all of their might? Because they love it and they’re attached to it and they want to be in it.

“That is so applicable to us, the Palestinian people, and for those who do not know us, this is a very important component of our being as Palestinians, of how much we love our homeland, how much we love our land and our country, whether it has palaces on it or whether it has destroyed homes.

“It is our land and we don’t have any other country except the country that we love, which is Palestine.”


UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law
Updated 15 August 2025

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law
  • Agency says plans would put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime
  • Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has vowed to press on with a long-delayed settlement project to “bury” idea of a Palestinian state

The UN human rights office said on Friday an Israeli plan to build to build thousands of new homes between an Israeli settlement in the West Bank and near East Jerusalem was illegal under international law, and would put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime.
Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Thursday vowed to press on a long-delayed settlement project, saying the move would “bury” the idea of a Palestinian state.
The UN rights office spokesperson said the plan would break the West Bank into isolated enclaves and that it was “a war crime for an occupying power to transfer its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognized by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank.
Most world powers say settlement expansion erodes the viability of a two-state solution by breaking up territory the Palestinians seek as part of a future independent state.
The two-state plan envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel, which captured all three territories in the 1967 Middle East war.
Israel cites historical and biblical ties to the area and says the settlements provide strategic depth and security and that the West Bank is “disputed” not “occupied.”


Israeli far-right minister confronts prominent Palestinian inmate

Israeli far-right minister confronts prominent Palestinian inmate
Updated 15 August 2025

Israeli far-right minister confronts prominent Palestinian inmate

Israeli far-right minister confronts prominent Palestinian inmate
  • Marwan Barghouti, a leading member of the Palestinian Fatah party, has spent more than 20 years behind bars
  • Israel considers him a ‘terrorist’ and convicted him over his role in the second intifada, or uprising, from 2000-2005

JERUSALEM: Israel’s far-right national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir published a video on Friday in which he confronts the most high-profile Palestinian detainee in Israeli custody in his prison cell.

Marwan Barghouti, a leading member of the Palestinian Fatah party, has spent more than 20 years behind bars after being sentenced for his role in anti-Israeli attacks in the early 2000s.

In the clip published by Ben Gvir on X, the minister and two other individuals, including a prison guard, surround Barghouti in a corner of his cell.

“You will not defeat us. Whoever harms the people of Israel, whoever kills children, whoever kills women... we will erase them,” Ben Gvir says in Hebrew.

Barghouti tries to respond but is interrupted by Ben Gvir, who says: “No, you know this. And it’s been the case throughout history.”

The video does not specify where Barghouti is currently being held.

Contacted by AFP, sources close to Ben Gvir said the meeting took place “by chance” in Ganot prison in southern Israel during an inspection visit by the minister, but they would not say when the footage was filmed.

“This morning I read that various ‘senior officials’ in the Palestinian Authority didn’t quite like what I said to arch-terrorist Marwan Barghouti – may his name be erased,” Ben Gvir said in the post accompanying the video on Friday morning.

“So I will repeat it again and again, without apology: whoever messes with the people of Israel, whoever murders our children, whoever murders our women – we will wipe them out. With God’s help.”

Barghouti, who is now in his sixties, was arrested in 2002 by Israel and sentenced to life in 2004 on murder charges.

Israel considers him a “terrorist” and convicted him over his role in the second intifada, or uprising, from 2000-2005.

He often tops opinion polls of popular Palestinian leaders and is sometimes described by his supporters as the “Palestinian Mandela.”

In a statement released by the official Palestinian news agency Wafa, the Palestinian Authority’s foreign ministry denounced “an unprecedented provocation” and described the confrontation as “organized state terrorism.”


Lebanon PM slams Hezbollah chief's 'civil war threat' over disarmament

Lebanon PM slams Hezbollah chief's 'civil war threat' over disarmament
Updated 9 min 37 sec ago

Lebanon PM slams Hezbollah chief's 'civil war threat' over disarmament

Lebanon PM slams Hezbollah chief's 'civil war threat' over disarmament
  • Naim Qassem vows to fight government plans to disarm the militant group
  • Nawaf Salam says his government's decisions are 'purely Lebanese and that any intimidation related to a conflict is totally unacceptable.

BEIRUT: Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem vowed Friday to fight government plans to disarm his group, with Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam accusing him of making “unacceptable” threats to unleash civil war.
Qassem gave a televised address after meeting with Iran’s security chief Ali Larijani, whose country has long backed the Lebanese militant group.
Hezbollah emerged badly weakened from last year’s war with Israel, and the Lebanese government — under US pressure — has ordered the army to draw up a plan to disarm the group by the end of the year.
Iran, whose so-called “axis of resistance” includes Hezbollah, has also suffered a series of setbacks, most recently in its own war with Israel, which also saw the United States strike its nuclear facilities.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

“The government is implementing an American-Israeli order to end the resistance, even if it leads to civil war and internal strife,” Qassem said.
“The resistance will not surrender its weapons while aggression continues, occupation persists, and we will fight it... if necessary to confront this American-Israeli project no matter the cost.”
He urged the government “not to hand over the country to an insatiable Israeli aggressor or an American tyrant with limitless greed,” adding the state would “bear responsibility for any internal explosion and any destruction of Lebanon.”
Prime Minister Salam later denounced the remarks, saying on X that they “constitute an implicit threat of civil war.”
He added that “any threat or intimidation related to such a war is totally unacceptable.”
Salam also hit back at Hezbollah’s characterization of the disarmament push as an American-Israeli effort.
“Our decisions are purely Lebanese, made by our cabinet, and no one tells us what to do,” he said.
Before the war with Israel, Hezbollah was believed to be better armed than the Lebanese military.
It long maintained it had to keep its arsenal in order to defend Lebanon from attack, but critics accused it of using its weapons for political leverage.
Qassem said Friday that Hezbollah and its political ally Amal would not be organizing any street protests against disarmament at this time, but threatened to do so in future.
Iran’s Supreme National Security Council chief Larijani was in Beirut this week, and held talks with Qassem as well as with President Joseph Aoun.
Iran has expressed its opposition to the government’s disarmament plan, and has vowed to continue to provide support, with Lebanese officials recently hardening their tone toward Hezbollah and its patron.
Both the president and the prime minister took issue with Iran’s recent statements during Larijani’s trip, with Salam saying Lebanon rejects “any interference in its internal affairs.”


Libya to hold rare local vote in test for divided nation

Libya to hold rare local vote in test for divided nation
Updated 15 August 2025

Libya to hold rare local vote in test for divided nation

Libya to hold rare local vote in test for divided nation
  • Rare municipal elections are seen as a test of democracy in a nation still plagued by division and instability
  • Key eastern cities — including Benghazi, Sirte and Tobruk — have rejected the vote, highlighting the deep rifts between rival administrations

TRIPOLI: Libya is set to hold rare municipal elections on Saturday, in a ballot seen as a test of democracy in a nation still plagued by division and instability.
Key eastern cities — including Benghazi, Sirte and Tobruk — have rejected the vote, highlighting the deep rifts between rival administrations.
The UN mission in Libya, UNSMIL, called the elections “essential to uphold democratic governance” while warning that recent attacks on electoral offices and ongoing insecurity could undermine the process.
“Libyans need to vote and to have the freedom to choose without fear and without being pressured by anyone,” said Esraa Abdelmonem, a 36-year-old mother of three.
“These elections would allow people to have their say in their day-to-day affairs,” she said, adding that it was “interesting to see” how the areas affected by the clashes in May would vote.
Since the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that toppled longtime leader Muammar Qaddafi, Libya has remained split between Tripoli’s UN-recognized government, led by Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibah and its eastern rival administration backed by military strongman Khalifa Haftar.
Khaled Al-Montasser, a Tripoli-based international relations professor, called the vote “decisive,” framing it as a test for whether Libya’s factions are ready to accept representatives chosen at the ballot box.
“The elections make it possible to judge whether the eastern and western authorities are truly ready to accept the idea that local representatives are appointed by the vote rather than imposed by intimidation or arms,” he said.
Nearly 380,000 Libyans, mostly from western municipalities, are expected to vote.
Elections had originally been planned in 63 municipalities nationwide — 41 in the west, 13 in the east, and nine in the south — but the High National Elections Commission (HNEC) suspended 11 constituencies in the east and south due to irregularities, administrative issues and pressure from local authorities.
In some areas near Tripoli, voting was also postponed due to problems distributing voter cards.
And on Tuesday, the electoral body said a group of armed men attacked its headquarters in Zliten, some 160 kilometers east of Tripoli.
No casualty figures were given, although UNSMIL said there were some injuries.
UNSMIL said the attack sought to “intimidate voters, candidates and electoral staff, and to prevent them from exercising their political rights to participate in the elections and the democratic process.”
National elections scheduled for December 2021 were postponed indefinitely due to disputes between the two rival powers.
Following Qaddafi’s death and 42 years of autocratic rule, Libya held its first free vote in 2012 to elect 200 parliament members at the General National Congress.
That was followed by the first municipal elections in 2013, and legislative elections in 2014 that saw a low turnout amid renewed violence.
In August that year, a coalition of militias seized Tripoli and installed a government with the backing of Misrata — then a politically influential city some 200 kilometers east of Tripoli — forcing the newly elected GNC parliament to relocate to the east.
The UN then brokered an agreement in December 2015 that saw the creation of the Government of National Accord, in Tripoli, with Fayez Al-Sarraj as its first premier, but divisions in the country have persisted still.
Other municipal elections did take place between 2019 and 2021, but only in a handful of cities.


Germany tells Israeli government to stop West Bank settlement construction

Germany tells Israeli government to stop West Bank settlement construction
Updated 15 August 2025

Germany tells Israeli government to stop West Bank settlement construction

Germany tells Israeli government to stop West Bank settlement construction
  • Germany ‘firmly rejects the Israeli government’s announcements regarding the approval of thousands of new housing units in Israeli settlements in the West Bank’
  • Germany has repeatedly warned the Israeli government to stop settlement construction in the West Bank

BERLIN: Germany on Friday called on the Israeli government to stop settlement construction in the West Bank after Israel’s far-right finance minister said work would start on a plan for thousands of homes that would divide the Palestinian territory.

Germany “firmly rejects the Israeli government’s announcements regarding the approval of thousands of new housing units in Israeli settlements in the West Bank,” said a foreign ministry spokesperson in a statement.

Plans for the “E1” settlement and the expansion of Maale Adumim would further restrict the mobility of the Palestinian population in the West Bank by splitting it in half and cutting the area off from East Jerusalem, said the spokesperson.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced on Thursday that work would start on the long-delayed settlement, a move that his office said would “bury” the idea of a Palestinian state.

In a statement, Smotrich’s spokesperson said the minister had approved the plan to build 3,401 houses for Israeli settlers between an existing settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem.

Germany has repeatedly warned the Israeli government to stop settlement construction in the West Bank, which violates international law and UN Security Council resolutions.

Such moves complicate steps toward a negotiated two-state solution and end to Israeli occupation of the West Bank, said the spokesperson.