ֱ

Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region

U.S. President Donald Trump looks on, during a meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 11, 2025. (REUTERS)
U.S. President Donald Trump looks on, during a meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 11, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 12 February 2025

Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region

Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region
  • Egyptian authorities have publicly rejected the idea of displacement of Palestinians on human rights grounds
  • From the earliest days of the Gaza war, Arab governments, particularly Egypt and Jordan, have said Palestinians must not be driven from land where they want to make a future state, which would include the occupied West Bank and Gaza

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has infuriated the Arab world by saying that Palestinians would not have the right of return to the Gaza Strip under his proposal to redevelop the enclave, which has been devastated by an Israeli offensive. From the earliest days of the Gaza war, Arab governments, particularly Egypt and Jordan, have said Palestinians must not be driven from land where they want to make a future state, which would include the occupied West Bank and Gaza. Trump first suggested on January 25 that Egypt and Jordan should take in Palestinians from Gaza, a proposal they strongly oppose. In a shock announcement on February 4, after meeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, Trump proposed resettling Gaza’s 2.2 million Palestinians and the US taking control and ownership of the demolished seaside enclave, redeveloping it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
On February 10, he said Palestinians would not have the right of return to Gaza under his plan, contradicting his own officials who had suggested Gazans would only be relocated temporarily. Trump’s plan touches on one of the most sensitive issues in the Arab-Israeli conflict, the right of Palestinians to return. Trump, known as a tough dealmaker in his earlier career as a property developer in New York, said that he believed he could persuade Jordan and Egypt to take in displaced Palestinians. He also said Palestinians could be resettled in “much better housing.”
Many of Gaza’s buildings have turned into rubble since the war between Hamas and Israel erupted on October 7, 2023.
Trump’s plans are likely to heighten fears among Palestinians in Gaza of being driven out of the coastal strip, and stoke concern in Arab states that have long worried about the destabilising impact of any such exodus.

WHAT IS BEHIND THE CONCERNS?
Palestinians have long been haunted by what they call the “Nakba,” or catastrophe, when 700,000 of them were dispossessed from their homes during the war that surrounded the creation of Israel in 1948.
Many were driven out or fled to neighboring Arab states, including to Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, where many of them and their descendants still live in refugee camps. Some went to Gaza. Israel disputes the account that they were forced out.
Today about 5.6 million Palestinian refugees — mainly the descendants of those who fled — currently live in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza. About half of registered refugees remain stateless, according to the Palestinian foreign ministry, many living in crowded camps.
Trump’s talk of resettling some two million Gazans is a nightmare for Jordan, which has long feared the mass expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank, and echoes a vision long propagated by right-wing Israelis of Jordan as an alternative Palestinian home.
The anxiety dates back to what is known as Black September. In 1970 the Jordanian army launched a huge offensive by that name to retake control of territory occupied by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in Jordan.
King Hussein, fearing the growing influence of Palestinian factions, cracked down on Palestinian nationalists. His generals ordered tanks into the capital Amman. Over 3,000 Palestinians were estimated killed and some 20,000 fled Jordan.
The latest conflict, currently paused amid a fragile ceasefire agreement, has seen an unprecedented Israeli bombardment and land offensive in Gaza, devastating urban areas.
Most Gazans have been displaced several times in Israel’s offensive, launched after the 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas that killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli tallies.
More than 48,000 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to Palestinian health officials.

HOW HAVE PALESTINIANS MOVED DURING THIS CONFLICT?
Before Israel launched its offensive in 2023, it told Palestinians in north Gaza to move to what it said were safe areas in the south. As the offensive expanded, Israel told them to head further south toward Rafah, on the border with Egypt.
Later in the war, before launching a campaign in Rafah, it instructed them to move to a new designated humanitarian zone in Al-Mawasi, an area that stretches 12 km (7 miles) along the coast, starting from the western areas of Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza to Khan Younis and Rafah in the south.
According to UN estimates, up to 85 percent of the population of Gaza — one of the world’s most densely populated areas — have already been displaced from their homes.

COULD A MAJOR DISPLACEMENT FROM GAZA HAPPEN?
Many Palestinians in Gaza have said they would not leave the enclave even if they could because they fear it might lead to another permanent displacement in a repeat of 1948.
Egyptian authorities have publicly rejected the idea of displacement of Palestinians on human rights grounds.
The most populous Arab country would also be wary of hosting hundreds of thousands of Palestinians potentially including members of Hamas, after years of crackdowns on domestic Islamists such as the Muslim Brotherhood, which had close ties to Hamas.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi has shown no tolerance for Islamists. He views them as an existential threat to his country and thousands of Islamist militants have been imprisoned.

WHAT HAVE ISRAEL’S GOVERNMENT AND ITS POLITICIANS SAID?
Israel’s then-Foreign Minister Israel Katz, now serving as defense minister, said on February 16, 2024, that Israel had no plans to deport Palestinians from Gaza. Israel would coordinate with Egypt on Palestinian refugees and find a way to not harm Egypt’s interests, Katz added.
However, comments by some in the Israeli government have stoked Palestinian and Arab fears of a new Nakba. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has repeatedly called for a policy of “encouraging the migration” of Palestinians from Gaza and for Israel to impose military rule in the territory.


India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs

India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs
Updated 10 August 2025

India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs

India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs
  • Modi set to meet China’s Xi, invites Vladimir Putin to visit India in the wake US tensions
  • Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50 percent over New Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil

New Delhi: India is bracing for the impact of new US tariffs, with experts warning of the economic and political consequences of an unprecedented duty on exports, marking one of the highest tariffs the US has ever imposed on a major trading partner.

In an unexpected move last week, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, citing New Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil. His Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said the oil imports amounted to “financing” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The move increased the total duty on Indian exports to 50 percent. While India’s Ministry of External Affairs vowed to “take all actions necessary to protect its national interests,” experts do not see much room for negotiations, as the tariff regime is set to take effect next month.

“It will have economic repercussions if things are not changed. Fifty percent is a lot, and it will affect us. Right now, there is an exemption for pharmaceuticals, but in other areas, there will be an impact,” Manoj Joshi, distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News.

“We don’t have much leverage. We don’t have many options. The US is the one taking these actions, so unless and until the US withdraws these taxes, there is not much India can do.”

The US and India have been in tariff talks since the beginning of the year, in the wake of the US ongoing global tariff campaign. Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a personal visit to Washington, D.C., in February to meet Trump and discuss strengthening bilateral ties, trade relations, and the procurement of new US weapons and aircraft.

In April, the Trump administration imposed a 25 percent reciprocal tariff on Indian goods in response to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil and to rectify trade imbalances. A new deal was expected in July, but Trump did not approve it, leading to a breakdown in talks.

The US threatened to increase tariffs on India if it were not given broader access to several key sectors, including automobiles, steel, aluminum, and dairy products — a concession New Delhi resisted.

“India is not going to compromise on agriculture and dairy products. India will find it very difficult to stop buying Russian oil. There is not much room for any kind of concessions from India’s side,” Joshi said.

The US is India’s largest export market, accounting for 18 percent of its exports and 2.2 percent of its gross domestic product. The latest estimates by Indian economists suggest that the new tariff could reduce GDP by 0.2 to 0.8 percentage points.

It could also have an impact on India’s global standing.

After emerging as a new superpower when it hosted the G20 Summit in 2023 and over the past few years betting everything on its strategic partnership with the US, India may now be forced to recalibrate its relations, including with its rival China.

India is a member of the QUAD — Quadrilateral Security Dialogue — a forum that also includes the US, Japan, and Australia and focuses on regional security and cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region.

India’s engagement with the bloc has increased in recent years, shifting from its earlier engagement with BRICS — a grouping that includes also Brazil, Russia, China, and Indonesia, and is the most powerful geopolitical forum outside of the Western world, accounting for 45 percent of the world’s population and 35 percent of its economy.

In the wake of tensions with the US, Modi is expected to visit China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization and meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in late August. This will be his first official trip to China in over six years. The last visit took place before the 2020 Galwan Valley border clashes, which significantly strained India-China ties.

Modi’s office said on Saturday that he had invited Vladimir Putin to visit Delhi by the year’s end. It would be the Russian president’s first trip to India since December 2021.

“Consequences would be there so long as Trump is there. But the whole episode has exposed the leadership of India,” said Mohan Guruswamy, policy analyst specializing in economic and security issues.

“India has been ignoring its traditional allies. It has been pursuing QUAD and trying to appease the US, forgetting China and Russia. It has been pursuing the US and calling them strategic allies, and now the US has given it a shock.”


European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump Putin meeting

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump Putin meeting
Updated 10 August 2025

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump Putin meeting

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump Putin meeting
  • Saturday’s statement by top European leaders came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Putin the one on one meeting Russia has long pushed for

KYIV: European nations rallied behind Ukraine, saying peace in the war-torn nation can’t be resolved without Kyiv, ahead of a planned meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
Trump had said Friday’s meeting in Alaska with his Russian counterpart was to discuss ending the more than three-year war.
Zelensky responded by thanking European allies and wrote on X on Sunday: “The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.”
Trump-Putin meeting spikes worries
Saturday’s statement by top European leaders came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Trump that a peace deal could include “some swapping of territories.” That raised fears that Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty.
A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they aren’t allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Putin.
Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance met Saturday with top European and Ukrainian officials at the British Foreign Secretary’s weekend residence to discuss how to end the war.
Trump had earlier said he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Zelensky.
The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbor and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there’s no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace.
The statement
Saturday’s statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the UK, stressed the need for a “just and lasting peace” for Kyiv, including “robust and credible” security guarantees.
“Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,” the statement said.
“The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,” the Europeans added.
A fruitless push toward a truce
A monthlong US-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking.
Trump had also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions Saturday about possible sanctions.
The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine give up territory, abandon its bid to join NATO, and accept limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country.
Zelensky said Saturday that Ukraine “will not give Russia any awards for what it has done” and that “Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.”
Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognize Ukraine’s inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Zelensky on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question.


Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters

Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters
Updated 10 August 2025

Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters

Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters
  • Met Police detain 474 people at peaceful demonstration in central London
  • Woman arrested in Belfast for wearing Palestine Action T-shirt at anti-racism protest

LONDON: Amnesty International has branded reports that police in the UK arrested 474 people at a Palestine Action protest “deeply concerning.”

It comes after a demonstration was held in Parliament Square in central London in support of the group, which was banned by the UK government earlier this year as a terrorist organization.

The Metropolitan Police said it was the largest spate of arrests it had made at a single event in over a decade, and that 466 people at the protest were arrested under the Terrorism Act.

Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International’s UK chief executive, said: “The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists.

“Instead of criminalizing peaceful demonstrators, the government should be focusing on taking immediate and unequivocal action to put a stop to Israel’s genocide and ending any risk of UK complicity in it.”

Those arrested included healthcare professionals, a blind wheelchair user, and former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg.

Many of the protesters were silently holding placards stating: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”

The group behind the protest, Defend Our Juries, said around 700 people attended the event and that they posed “no danger to the public at large.”

Elsewhere, a woman was arrested in Belfast, Northern Ireland, for wearing a T-shirt supporting Palestine Action. The woman was detained while attending an anti-racism protest, where she was filmed being taken by police officers on suspicion of “possessing an article, namely a sign or T-shirt, that indicates support for Palestine Action.”

Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland director of Amnesty International UK, said: “Many people are justifiably angered by the ongoing genocide in Gaza and are concerned about UK complicity. Under international human rights law, they have every right to voice their concerns.

“The individual who joined a Refugees Welcome rally in Belfast was not promoting violence, and it is wholly disproportionate for the PSNI to treat her as a terrorist.

“UK terrorism laws pose a serious risk to free expression. Rather than targeting peaceful protesters, the government should be taking swift and decisive measures to end Israel’s genocide.”

Under UK terrorism legislation, membership of or support for a proscribed group is a criminal offense carrying a prison sentence of up to 14 years.

Palestine Action was banned following a series of break-ins at secure facilities in the UK, including one in which activists caused criminal damage to military aircraft at a Royal Air Force base in the town of Brize Norton.


Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan

Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan
Updated 10 August 2025

Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan

Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan
  • Sistan-Baluchistan has been the site of frequent clashes between security forces and insurgents or smugglers
  • On July 26, gunmen had stormed a courthouse in the province’s capital Zahedan, killing at least six people

TEHRAN: Militants killed one policeman in Iran’s restive southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchistan, Iranian media reported Sunday, adding that three assailants also died.

“A policeman from Saravan was killed while terrorists were trying to enter the police station” in that area of Sistan-Baluchistan, the Tasnim news agency said.

The agency said the attackers were members of Jaish Al-Adl (Arabic for ‘Army of Justice’) Baloch militant group, which operates from the borderlands between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan, mainly the Sistan-Baluchestan triangle, but active inside Iran.

“Three terrorists were killed and two were arrested,” Tasnim said.

Sistan-Baluchistan, which shares a long border with Pakistan and Afghanistan, has been the site of frequent clashes between security forces and insurgents or smugglers.

The province hosts a significant population from the Baloch ethnic minority, which practices Sunni Islam in Shiite-majority Iran.

On July 26, gunmen stormed a courthouse in the province’s capital Zahedan, killing at least six people, in an attack that was later claimed by Jaish Al-Adl.

In one of the deadliest attacks in the province, 10 police officers were killed in October.


Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel

Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel
Updated 10 August 2025

Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel

Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel
  • Greens say Labor stance ‘hollow’ as world watches ‘genocide in real time’
  • Defense minister refuses to stop export of F-35 parts, claims Australia not selling weapons to Israel

LONDON: The Australian government has been criticized by opposition politicians and human rights experts for continuing to export components to Israel used to make weapons.

The Australian Greens condemned the Labor government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, with its foreign affairs spokesperson David Shoebridge stating: “The Australian public knows that the Albanese government is permitting the export of armored steel, F-35 weapons parts and other critical materials to Israel and wants it to stop.”

Shoebridge added: “Two years of hollow talking points from the Albanese government aren’t washing with the public anymore as we watch a genocide in real time.”

It comes after the country’s Defense Minister Richard Marles said Australia did not send weapons to Israel but would continue to manufacture and export parts for the Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jet, which is used by the Israeli military.

“We’re an F-35 country and we have been that for a couple of decades,” Marles said.

“That is a multi-lateral arrangement with supply chains that are organized by Lockheed Martin in the United States and have multiple suppliers in respect of all of those supply chains.”

He was speaking after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz took the unprecedented step of stopping exports of military equipment to Israel after an announcement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel would expand operations in Gaza.

Marles said there had been “misinformation” about Australia’s arms exports to Israel, adding there was “no step” the country could take that would have any material impact on the war.

But Shoebridge said: “Australia is a key part of the F-35 fighter jet program. We are the only place in the world that makes parts like the bomb bay doors (mechanism), and we operate as one of the few regional distribution hubs.”

He added that if Australia refused to export F-35 components, it would hinder Israel’s ability to operate in Gaza. “The fact Albanese is choosing not to do that makes us complicit (in genocide),” Shoebridge said.

Donald Rothwell, professor of international law at the Australian National University, told The Guardian that the complexity of manufacturing supply chains meant that parts made for civilian use and then exported could be appropriated for weapons, making export bans difficult.

“The clearer position that Australia could take is that if it diplomatically, legally and politically objects to Israel’s occupation of Gaza, then all exports could be suspended for the time being. That would be the clearest way of ensuring that no Australian exports contribute to the Israeli military effort in Gaza,” he said.

In November, The Guardian reported that at least 16 Australian export permits to Israel for components used in arms manufacturing had lapsed or been amended. A spokesperson for the Australian government said all had been approved prior to Oct. 7, 2023.

In April, ABC found that an Australian-built counter-drone system was being tested by the Israeli military.

Albanese has previously stated that Australia has an appropriate set of sanctions in place against several Israeli government figures owing to their actions in relation to the war in Gaza.

“What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,” Albanese said during a visit to New Zealand.

On Sunday, Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong signed a joint statement with her German, Italian, New Zealand and UK counterparts warning that Israel’s plan to expand operations in Gaza risked breaking international law.