ֱ

Iran, European powers to hold nuclear talks ahead of Trump return

Iran, European powers to hold nuclear talks ahead of Trump return
The IAEA flag flutters in the wind outside of the IAEA headquarters during the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA's Board of Governors meeting at the agency's headquarters in Vienna (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 January 2025

Iran, European powers to hold nuclear talks ahead of Trump return

Iran, European powers to hold nuclear talks ahead of Trump return
  • The talks come as Iran’s nuclear program received renewed focus in light of Trump’s imminent return to the White House on January 20

GENEVA: Iran is set to hold nuclear talks with France, Britain and Germany on Monday, just a week before US President-elect Donald Trump takes office.
They are the second round of talks over Iran’s nuclear program in less than two months, following a discreet meeting held in Geneva, Switzerland, in November between Tehran and the three European powers, known as the E3.
“These are not negotiations,” the German foreign ministry told AFP. Iran has similarly emphasized that the talks are merely “consultations.”
The talks, scheduled for Monday and Tuesday, will cover a “wide range of topics,” Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said during a weekly press briefing.
“The primary objective of these talks is to remove the sanctions” on Iran, he noted, adding that Iran was also “listening to the... topics that the opposite parties want to raise.”
On Thursday, France’s foreign ministry said the meeting was a sign that the E3 countries “are continuing to work toward a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear program, the progress of which is extremely problematic.”
The talks come as Iran’s nuclear program received renewed focus in light of Trump’s imminent return to the White House on January 20.
During his first term, Trump had pursued a policy of “maximum pressure,” withdrawing the US from a landmark nuclear deal which imposed curbs on Iran’s nuclear program in return for sanctions relief.
Tehran adhered to the deal until Washington’s withdrawal, but then began rolling back its commitments.
Efforts to revive the 2015 nuclear pact have since faltered and European officials have repeatedly expressed frustrations over Tehran’s non-compliance.
’Breaking point’
Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron said the acceleration of Iran’s nuclear program is “bringing us very close to the breaking point.” Iran later blasted the comments as “baseless” and “deceitful.”
In December, Britain, Germany and France accused Tehran of growing its stockpile of high enriched uranium to “unprecedented levels” without “any credible civilian justification.”
“We reiterate our determination to use all diplomatic tools to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, including using snapback if necessary,” they added.
The snapback mechanism — part of the 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)-- allows signatories to reimpose United Nations sanctions on Iran in cases of the “significant non-performance” of commitments.
The option to trigger the mechanism expires in October this year, adding urgency to the ongoing diplomatic efforts.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) nuclear watchdog says Iran has increased its manufacturing of enriched uranium such that it is the only non-nuclear weapons state to possess uranium enriched to 60 percent.
That level is well on the way to the 90 percent required for an atomic bomb.
Iran maintains that its nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes and denies any intention to develop atomic weapons.
It has also repeatedly expressed willingness to revive the deal.
President Masoud Pezeshkian, who took office in July, has favored reviving that agreement and called for ending his country’s isolation.
In a recent interview with China’s CCTV, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi also expressed willingness “to engage in constructive negotiations.”
“The formula that we believe in is the same as the previous JCPOA formula, namely, building trust on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for lifting sanctions,” he added.


Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal

Updated 5 sec ago

Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal

Turkish-born man who burned Qur'an in London wins appeal
Coskun had set the religious book alight outside the Turkish consulate in London in February
Judge Bennathan told Southwark Crown Court that: “There is no offense of blasphemy in our law“

LONDON: A Turkish-born man who burned a Qur'an in London won an appeal on Friday against his conviction, in a ruling hailed by free-speech campaigners.
Hamit Coskun, 51, was found guilty in June of a religiously aggravated public order offense and was issued with a fine.
He had set the religious book alight outside the Turkish consulate in London in February while shouting slogans against Islam.
His case was taken up by the National Secular Society (NSS) and the Free Speech Union (FSU), who argued that Coskun was essentially being prosecuted for blasphemy.
Ruling in Coskun’s favor, judge Joel Bennathan told Southwark Crown Court on Friday that: “There is no offense of blasphemy in our law.”
“Burning a Qur'an may be an act that many Muslims find desperately upsetting and offensive,” according to the judge.
He said that the criminal law does not seek to “avoid people being upset, even grievously upset.”
“The right to freedom of expression, if it is a right worth having, must include the right to express views that offend, shock or disturb,” he added.
Blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008.
In a statement, Coskun, who is half-Kurdish and half-Armenian, said he came to England “having been persecuted in Turkiye, to be able to speak freely about the dangers of radical Islam.”
“I am reassured that, despite many troubling developments, I will now be free to educate the British public about my beliefs,” he added.
The FSU said the successful appeal sent a message that “anti-religious protests, however offensive to true believers, must be tolerated.”
Coskun has also received the support of the opposition Conservative party’s justice spokesperson Robert Jenrick.

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears
Updated 2 min 58 sec ago

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears

France’s Macron faces decision day, as his deadline to name a premier nears
  • Macron has set himself a deadline of Friday evening to name a new premier
  • France’s mainstream parties are keen to avoid a snap parliamentary election

PARIS: President Emmanuel Macron will convene a meeting of France’s mainstream political parties on Friday ahead of a self-imposed deadline to name a new prime minister, as the country’s central bank chief warned political turmoil was sapping economic growth.
Macron, 47, is searching for his sixth prime minister in under two years and will need to find a figure whose appeal spans the center-right to center-left in order to steer the budget for 2026 through a fragmented and fractious parliament.
Ahead of the meeting, the president’s Elysee office said the gathering needed to be a “moment of collective responsibility,” which political pundits quickly interpreted as a signal that Macron could call snap elections if no consensus candidate was found.

MACRON SETS FRIDAY EVENING DEADLINE TO NAME PM
Macron has set himself a deadline of Friday evening to name a new premier.
The daily Le Parisien newspaper reported that Macron intended to reappoint Sebastien Lecornu, who resigned as prime minister on Monday after just 27 days in the post, and that the president did not rule out a snap vote if other party leaders reject the proposal.
The Elysee did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Other names that have been floated in political circles include veteran centrist Jean-Louis Borloo, the head of the public auditor Pierre Moscovici, and Nicolas Revel, a technocrat who leads the Paris hospitals administration.

BUDGET WRANGLING HAS EXACERBATED POLITICAL CRISIS
Reappointing Lecornu would risk alienating the political leaders whose backing Macron needs to form a broad-based government that can get a budget over the line.
Wrangling over a budget that can both rein in the country’s deficit while meeting the conflicting demands of both the left and conservatives has been going on for weeks, with Socialist demands for a repeal of a 2023 pensions reform and for heavier taxation of the rich proving big stumbling blocks.
“People tell me: ‘He’s going to test the Lecornu 2 hypothesis on you.’ If that’s the case, I wish him good luck,” Green party chief Marine Tondelier told TF1 television.
Gabriel Attal, a former Macron prime minister and head of the president’s Renaissance party, cautioned the president against unilaterally naming the next premier without wider support.
“I fear that trying the same method ... of naming a prime minister before there has been a compromise will produce the same effects,” Attal said in an interview with France 2 television.
The meeting, due to take place from 1230 GMT, is excluding the far-right National Rally (RN) and hard-left France Unbowed (LFI) — two of the largest political parties in the National Assembly.
“The RN is honored not to have been invited. We are not for sale to those around Macron,” RN party chairman Bardella wrote on X.

SNAP ELECTION WOULD POSE RISKS FOR MAINSTREAM PARTIES
France’s mainstream parties are keen to avoid a snap parliamentary election. Opinion polls forecast the RN would be the main beneficiary and that another hung parliament dominated by three ideologically opposed blocs would be the most likely result.
The crisis is the deepest that France, the euro zone’s second-largest economy, has seen for decades. The turmoil was precipitated in part by the president’s failed gamble on a snap election last year that further weakened his minority in parliament.
The central bank chief, Francois Villeroy de Galhau, forecast the political uncertainty would cost the economy 0.2 percentage points of gross domestic product. Business sentiment was suffering but the economy was broadly fine, he said.
“Uncertainty is ... the number one enemy of growth,” Villeroy told RTL radio.
Villeroy said it would be preferable if the deficit did not exceed 4.8 percent of GDP in 2026. The deficit is forecast to hit 5.4 percent this year, nearly double the European Union’s cap.
Macron’s second-to-last prime minister, Francois Bayrou, was ousted by the National Assembly over his plans for 44 billion euros in savings to bring the deficit down to 4.6 percent.
Rating agencies issued a fresh round of warnings about France’s sovereign credit score this week after Lecornu said on Monday his government was resigning, just 14 hours after he had announced his cabinet line-up.


India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits
Updated 7 min 23 sec ago

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visits
  • India, Afghanistan to revive air corridor for trade, bypassing land route through Pakistan
  • India signals willingness to return to previous representation level in Afghanistan, expert says

New Delhi: India will reopen its embassy in Kabul, Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said on Friday, in a meeting with his Afghan counterpart, Amir Khan Muttaqi, the first senior official from Afghanistan visiting New Delhi since the Taliban took power in 2021.

India closed its embassy when the Taliban took control four years ago, when Afghanistan’s Western-backed regime collapsed and US-led troops withdrew after two decades of military occupation.

Like all other countries, except for Russia, India also does not officially recognize Afghanistan’s Taliban administration, but in 2022, it opened what it called a “technical mission” to facilitate trade and humanitarian aid.

The mission will now be upgraded, Jaishankar told Muttaqi during their live-streamed meeting in New Delhi.

“Your visit marks an important step in advancing our ties and affirming the enduring friendship between India and Afghanistan,” he said.

 

 

“Closer cooperation between us contributes to your national development, as well as regional stability and resilience. To enhance that, I am pleased to announce today the upgrading of India’s technical mission in Kabul to the status of Embassy of India.”

Muttaqi arrived in India on Thursday. Like most Taliban leaders, he has been sanctioned by the UN, but the Security Council said last month that he was granted “an exemption to the travel ban” to visit New Delhi from Oct. 9 to 16.

“I’m happy today that I am here in Delhi and this visit will increase and strengthen the understanding between both countries and open a new chapter of these relations,” he said in the meeting with Jaishankar.

“During the American occupation, there were many ups and downs that happened. However, throughout this time, we never gave a statement against India, rather we always sought good relations with India. We will not allow any group to threaten anyone else or to use the territory of Afghanistan against others.”

In a statement after the meeting, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said that New Delhi agreed to “deepen its engagement” in developmental, healthcare and infrastructure projects in Afghanistan, as well as to offer scholarships to Afghan students to pursue studies at Indian universities.

The ministry also announced plans to increase economic engagement.

“The Afghan side invited Indian companies to invest in the mining sector which would help strengthen the bilateral trade and commercial relations,” it said.

“Both sides welcomed the commencement of the India-Afghanistan Air Freight Corridor, which will further enhance direct trade and commerce between the two countries.” 

The corridor is a trade initiative launched in 2017 under Afghanistan’s previous government to promote direct air cargo connectivity between the two countries, bypassing land routes that were often restricted due to political tensions, especially with Pakistan which lies between the two countries.

“I think India is certainly signaling that it is willing to consider moving towards the same level of representation as in the past, and changing the technical mission into a full embassy underscores that,” said Prof. Harsh V. Pant, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi.

“The important thing here is that both Taliban are willing to engage with India and make it very clear that they are interested in India having a larger economic role in Afghanistan.

“And India is also indicating that it does not want to be left out because other countries, in particular China, seem to be making a go at it ... It seems that this is certainly the beginning of a new phase of India’s engagement in Afghanistan.”


White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’
Updated 44 min 36 sec ago

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’
  • “The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace,” Cheung said
  • “President Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives”

WASHINGTON: The White House lashed out at the Norwegian Nobel Committee on Friday after it awarded the peace prize to Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado and overlooked US President Donald Trump.
“The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace,” White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung said on X.
“President Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives. He has the heart of a humanitarian, and there will never be anyone like him who can move mountains with the sheer force of his will.”


Since returning to the White House for his second term in January, Trump had repeatedly insisted that he deserved the Nobel for his role in resolving numerous conflicts — a claim observers say is broadly exaggerated.
Trump restated his claim on the eve of the peace prize announcement, saying that his brokering of the first phase of a ceasefire in Gaza this week was the eighth war he had ended.
But he added on Thursday: “Whatever they do is fine. I know this: I didn’t do it for that, I did it because I’ve saved a lot of lives.”
Nobel Prize experts in Oslo had insisted in the run-up to Friday’s announcement that Trump had no chance, noting that his “America First” policies run counter to the ideals of the Peace Prize as laid out in Alfred Nobel’s 1895 will creating the award.


After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway

After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway
Updated 10 October 2025

After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway

After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway
  • The very act of recognition — granted on 28 May, 2024 — means that Oslo no longer considers Palestinians like Adam to be stateless
  • “We don’t know what is the reason behind this. Is it to satisfy some parties who are against immigrants or is it for some other reasons?” said Adam

LONDON: When Norway recognized Palestine as a state, Palestinian engineer Adam was thrilled by the show of support, little knowing the move would ultimately derail his family’s dream of winning citizenship in their adopted homeland.
The very act of recognition — granted on 28 May, 2024 — means that Oslo no longer considers Palestinians like Adam to be stateless, according to the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI) which oversees visa processes.
And this change has upended Adam’s dreams and left him dumbfounded by what has turned out to be a poisoned chalice.
“We don’t know what is the reason behind this. Is it to satisfy some parties who are against immigrants or is it for some other reasons?” said Adam, who wanted to use a pseudonym for fear of retaliation.
“You support us, which is appreciated. At the same time, you are punishing Palestinians when you recognize their state. It doesn’t make any sense,” the father of two told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in a video interview from Norway.
Legal and migrant charities worry that Norway may also have set a dangerous precedent — denying millions of other Palestinians who live outside their homeland the protections that are routinely granted to the stateless.
Britain, France and Australia were among the latest nations to officially recognize the Palestinian state last month, with leaders hoping the move would pressure Israel to end its devastating two-year military campaign in Gaza.
A ceasefire in Gaza was announced on Thursday as part of the first phase of a US-backed peace deal to end a conflict that has killed more than 67,000 Palestinians.
Israel launched its assault on Gaza after Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and seizing 251 hostages.
Arab countries say the peace plan must lead to eventual independence for a Palestinian state. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says this will never happen.
Experts meanwhile worry that the pickup in recognition for a Palestinian state — more than 150 countries have now made the move — may perversely curtail the rights of some of the 7.6 million Palestinians living outside the occupied territories.

LEGAL LIMBO
Adam would have been able to apply for citizenship in 2026 under rules that make stateless people eligible for naturalization after living in country for three years.
Children born stateless can become citizens after one year.
But that all changed after Norway backed statehood.
The UDI says Palestinians who are on the civil registry in the West Bank, Gaza or East Jerusalem and assigned ID cards can no longer apply for Norwegian citizenship as stateless persons.
Born in the West Bank, Adam and his family all have Palestinian documents which means they now need to wait eight years — like any other migrant — before they can apply for citizenship, leaving them in legal limbo.
Nor does it just affect Palestinians in Norway.
“We are worried about our people in other countries because these countries may do exactly what Norway did,” said Adam.
The Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion, which oversees immigration and welfare policies, did not respond to a request for comment before the publication of this article.
The European Network on Statelessness (ENS), a civil society alliance, said Palestinians who have no other nationality should retain protections as their homeland remains under Israeli occupation.
Patricia Cabral, legal policy coordinator at ENS, says other authorities could follow Norway’s example — noting that Palestinians in Bulgaria and Hungary had already seen their rights curbed by statehood recognition.
“Stateless Palestinians, as other stateless people, should be granted residency rights, access to economic and social rights, and a facilitated route to naturalization,” Cabral said. “They shouldn’t be kept in limbo for a long time.”

STATEHOOD?
Despite growing political support, a Palestinian state currently lacks the core elements of a state, Cabral said.
These would include control over borders and a population registry, the ability to issue identity and travel documents, and the right to decide how nationality is passed on, she said.
As it stands, Israel restricts access into Palestinian territories for goods, investment and educational or cultural exchanges.
There are no Palestinian airports.
The landlocked West Bank can be reached only through Israel or through the Israeli-controlled border with Jordan.
Israel now controls all access to the Gaza Strip since capturing Gaza’s buffer zone on the border with Egypt last year.
As part of the ceasefire deal, it is supposed to eventually withdraw troops, although timings remain unclear.
“You recognize Palestine as a state, but does Palestine actually have a nationality law? They don’t,” said Marek Linha, senior legal adviser at the Norwegian Organization for Asylum Seekers charity, which is supporting affected Palestinians.
“There are legal questions that need to be carefully considered, and unfortunately, it has not been done as far as I can see, or from what is publicly available (in Norway),” he said in a phone interview.
Adam said he and his wife have abandoned plans for a third child since any newborn would now start life stateless.
Palestinians typically need to travel to Palestinian territories to give birth and get a birth certificate, plus other documents, since most embassies cannot issue them.
Adam said he fears one of his children’s passports might expire by the time they can apply for citizenship, which means they would need to travel to the West Bank for renewal.
“Norway is pushing us to do this. I am forced to go to Palestine to renew my documents. We have to go to Palestine if we have a new baby. It means exposing our young children to dangerous and traumatic experiences in conflict zones,” he said.
“We both work. We have an income. We are not looking for any social support from the government. We’re looking for stability.”