ֱ

Quaker group halts New York Times ads over ‘Gaza genocide’ language dispute

Quaker group halts New York Times ads over ‘Gaza genocide’ language dispute
Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli strike on a house, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, Jan. 9, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 09 January 2025

Quaker group halts New York Times ads over ‘Gaza genocide’ language dispute

Quaker group halts New York Times ads over ‘Gaza genocide’ language dispute
  • American Friends Service Committee claims newspaper asked it to replace word ‘genocide’ with ‘war’
  • Proposed ad urged US Congress to ‘stop arming Israel’s genocide in Gaza’

LONDON: An American Quaker group has paused its advertisements with the New York Times after the newspaper refused to allow the use of the term “genocide” to describe Israel’s actions in Gaza.

“The refusal of the New York Times to run paid digital ads that call for an end to Israel’s genocide in Gaza is an outrageous attempt to sidestep the truth,” said Joyce Ajlouny, general secretary of the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker organization that advocates for peace.

“Palestinians and allies have been silenced and marginalized in the media for decades as these institutions choose silence over accountability. It is only by challenging this reality that we can hope to forge a path toward a more just and equitable world.”

The controversy arose after the AFSC submitted an ad with the text: “Tell Congress to stop arming Israel’s genocide in Gaza now! As a Quaker organization, we work for peace. Join us. Tell the president and Congress to stop the killing and starvation in Gaza.”

The New York Times’ advertising team reportedly requested that the AFSC replace the word “genocide” with “war.” When the AFSC refused, the newspaper’s ad acceptability team said that “differing views on the situation” required adherence to “factual accuracy and legal standards” to ensure compliance with its guidelines.

A spokesperson for the New York Times said in response to questions from The Guardian in the UK: “New York Times advertising works with parties submitting proposed ads to ensure they are in compliance with our acceptability guidelines.

“This instance was no different, and is entirely in line with the standards we apply to all ad submissions.”

However, the AFSC strongly criticized the decision, pointing out that many human rights organizations, legal scholars, and even the UN have described Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide or genocidal acts.

“The suggestion that the New York Times couldn’t run an ad against Israel’s genocide in Gaza because there are ‘differing views’ is absurd,” said Layne Mullett, director of media relations for the AFSC.

“The New York Times advertises a wide variety of products and advocacy messages on which there are differing views. Why is it not acceptable to publicize the meticulously documented atrocities committed by Israel and paid for by the United States?”

The AFSC also pointed to The Washington Post’s recent decision to run an Amnesty International ad that also used the term genocide, questioning why the New York Times applied different standards.

The Quaker group has been involved in humanitarian work in Gaza since 1948 and currently operates in Gaza, Ramallah, and Jerusalem. Since October 2023, the AFSC’s staff in Gaza have provided 1.5 million meals, hygiene kits, and other essential aid to displaced individuals. The organization is also lobbying for a permanent ceasefire, full humanitarian access, the release of captives, and an end to US military funding for Israel.

According to The Guardian, the New York Times has previously run advertisements using the term genocide.

In 2016, it published an ad from the Armenian Educational Foundation thanking Kim Kardashian for opposing denial of the Armenian genocide. In 2008, presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain co-signed a letter advertisement in the New York Times calling out the genocide in Sudan’s Darfur.

It also noted that while the New York Times reserves the right to reject ads it deems inaccurate or deceptive, its advertising guidelines state that “advertising space is open to all points of view” and submissions may be subject to fact-checking.


Eurovision members to decide who takes part in 2026 contest as calls mount for Israel to be excluded

Eurovision members to decide who takes part in 2026 contest as calls mount for Israel to be excluded
Updated 1 min 3 sec ago

Eurovision members to decide who takes part in 2026 contest as calls mount for Israel to be excluded

Eurovision members to decide who takes part in 2026 contest as calls mount for Israel to be excluded
  • The board of the European Broadcasting Union has sent a letter to members indicating that the vote will take place online in early November
  • Countries including Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain have threatened not to participate in the contest unless Israel is excluded

GENEVA: Eurovision Song Contest organizers say member countries will vote in November about which countries can participate in the musical extravaganza next year, as calls have mounted for Israel to be excluded over the war in Gaza.
Spokesman Dave Goodman said in an email Friday that the board of the European Broadcasting Union, which brings together public broadcasters, has sent a letter to members indicating that the vote will take place at an extraordinary general meeting held online in early November.
Countries including Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain have threatened not to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest unless Israel is excluded from the competition over the war in Gaza.
The Eurovision Song Contest 2026 will take place in May in Vienna: The honor of hosting is granted to the winner of the previous year. The winner this year in Basel, Switzerland, was Austria’s JJ for the song “Wasted Love”.
Eurovision is a competition in which performers from countries across Europe, and a few beyond it, compete under their national flags with the aim of being crowned continental champion — a sort of Olympics of pop music.
It’s also a place where politics and regional rivalries play out. Russia was banned from Eurovision after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.


Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians

Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians
Updated 25 September 2025

Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians

Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians
  • It follows reports that Israeli military surveillance agency used Microsoft cloud services to store millions of phone calls made in Gaza and West Bank since 2022
  • The intelligence obtained from the call data was reportedly used to plan military bombing campaigns

DUBAI: Microsoft has terminated the Israeli military’s access to technology it used for the mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

The tech firm informed Israeli authorities it would “cease and disable specified IMOD (Israel Ministry of Defense) subscriptions and their services, including their use of specific cloud storage and AI services and technologies,” Brad Smith, the vice-chair and president of Microsoft said in a company memo and blog post on Thursday.

Cybersecurity services provided by the company to Israel and other countries in the Middle East are not affected, he added.

The decision follows the preliminary findings of a formal review launched by Microsoft last month in response to a report by The Guardian newspaper on an investigation it carried out in partnership with the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, and the Hebrew-language news site Local Call.

The joint investigation found Israel’s military surveillance agency, Unit 8200, used Microsoft Azure cloud services to store recordings of millions of cellphone calls made by Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank since 2022.

The intelligence obtained from the call data stored in Azure was reportedly used by Unit 8200 to identify targets for military bombing campaigns. When planning airstrikes in densely populated areas containing many civilians, intelligence officers would analyze calls from Palestinians located nearby, sources said. They described the system as indiscriminate and intrusive, labeling it a tool that had turned an entire population into the “enemy.”

During development of the system, Microsoft and Unit 8200 engineers collaborated to implement advanced security measures in Azure that met the standards required by the Israeli agency. The project was highly secretive, and Microsoft staff were instructed not to make any mention of Unit 8200.

To protect the privacy rights of cellphone users, the Microsoft review did not access the IMOD data but instead focused on the company’s own business records, including internal documents and email communications, Smith said.

“We do not provide technology to facilitate mass surveillance of civilians,” he added. “We have applied this principle in every country around the world, and we have insisted on it repeatedly for more than two decades.”


AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month

AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month
Updated 25 September 2025

AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month

AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month

NEW YORK: Two major news agencies demanded that Israel explain what happened during a strike on a hospital in Gaza last month that killed five journalists, calling for concrete actions and accountability to ensure it doesn’t happen again.
Reuters and The Associated Press — through their top editors, Alessandra Galloni and Julie Pace — urged the Israeli government to “explain the deaths of these journalists and to take every step to protect those who continue to cover this conflict.” Their statement came on the one-month anniversary of the strike.
Killed in the strikes were five journalists, including visual journalist Mariam Dagga, who worked for AP and other news organizations; Reuters cameraman Hussam Al-Masri; and Moaz Abu Taha, a freelance journalist whose work had been published by Reuters. Seventeen others were killed in the strike.
“We renew our demand for a clear account from the Israeli authorities and urge the government to uphold its obligations to ensure press freedom and protection,” the statement from the AP and Reuters said. “We remain devastated and outraged by their deaths.”
The journalists died at the Nasser Hospital, which the agencies pointed out is a location protected under international law and “widely known to be crucial for news coverage out of Gaza.”
“An incident of this gravity requires a prompt and clear explanation, followed by accountability and concrete actions to ensure such attacks are never repeated,” the statement said.
The two agencies wrote a joint letter immediately after the attack, but that Israel has not responded. The Israeli military said it launched an investigation into the incident.
The Gaza war has been deadly for those covering it. Nearly 200 journalists and media workers have been killed in the region since the attacks by Hamas on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Comparatively, 18 journalists have been killed so far in Russia’s war in Ukraine, according to the CPJ.
AP reporting on the attack on the hospital raised serious questions about Israel’s rationale for the strikes and the way they were carried out.
The agencies’ statement was issued a day before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to address the UN General Assembly during its annual leaders’ meeting.
Dagga, 33, was among the war’s victims. She and the four other reporters were killed when Israeli forces struck Nasser Hospital in the Gaza town of Khan Younis, along with 17 other people.
The Israeli military said it targeted what it believed was a Hamas surveillance camera in the hospital attack, without providing evidence, and that the journalists weren’t the targets. The prime minister called the attack a ‘“mishap.’’


Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists
Updated 25 September 2025

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists
  • The short film from the BBC, AFP, Reuters and AP times to coincide with the UN General Assembly taking place in New York

LONDON: Four major international news agencies have released a film that urges Israel to allow foreign journalists into Gaza.

The short film from the BBC, AFP, Reuters and AP, times to coincide with the UN General Assembly taking place in New York, features historic journalistic footage from conflicts such as World War II, Vietnam, Tiananmen Square, the Rwandan genocide, the Syrian refugee crisis and the war in Ukraine.

“History is told by those who report it,” it begins, narrated by BBC journalist David Dimbleby.

“The report of a child’s body washed up on a beach revealed the stark reality of the Syrian refugee crisis; in Ukraine, journalists from around the world risk their lives every day to report the suffering of the people,” he said, over a slideshow of wartime images.

“But when it comes to Gaza, the job of reporting falls solely to Palestinian journalists who are paying a terrible cost, leaving fewer to bear witness.”

 

 

The BBC said in a statement on Thursday that the film aims “to highlight the importance of independent journalism throughout key moments in recent history.”

Deborah Turness, CEO of BBC News, said: “As journalists, we record the first draft of history. But in this conflict, reporting is falling solely to a small number of Palestinian journalists, who are paying a terrible cost.”

Foreign journalists have been barred from entering the enclave since the onset of Israel’s war in Gaza, which followed the attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. Only a select few have been escorted in under tight military control, sparking accusations of censorship and a lack of transparency.

Israel has cited security concerns for the restrictions. In a statement last year, the Israel Defense Forces claimed journalists were accompanied “to ensure safety” in battlefield areas.

Media watchdogs and human rights groups have described the Gaza conflict as the deadliest for journalists.

According to the UN Human Rights Office, at least 248 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza since the war began. The Israeli government denies they are deliberately targeted.

“We must now be let into Gaza. To work alongside local journalists, so we can all bring the facts to the world,” Turness said.

The new film premiered in New York on Wednesday night during an event hosted by the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Israel is facing mounting international pressure to end the war on Gaza after a wave of Western countries formally recognized the State of Palestine this week amid renewed backing for a two-state solution to the decades-long conflict.

The war has killed more than 65,000 people in Gaza, according to local authorities, and triggered a catastrophic humanitarian crisis marked by famine and widespread displacement.

In response to the diplomatic shift, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state and threatened to annex parts of the occupied West Bank, defying growing global calls for a negotiated solution.

In previous months, the four media outlets had issued joint statements expressing concern over the humanitarian conditions faced by journalists in Gaza, including hunger, displacement and the risk of death.

In August, 27 countries, including the UK, issued a joint statement urging Israel to allow immediate foreign media access to Gaza and condemning attacks on journalists.


Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high

Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high
Updated 25 September 2025

Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high

Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high
  • “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” achieved the ratings milestone, even though the show did not reach about one-quarter of American households

WASHINGTON: Millions of people tuned in to “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Tuesday to watch the host’s return to late-night television after a nearly week-long suspension, propelling the show to a 10-year ratings high among adult viewers, ABC said.
The network said 6.26 million viewers watched Kimmel as he used sincerity and humor to thank his supporters while addressing remarks he made on September 15 about the man accused of assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
It was the highest-rated regularly scheduled episode of the late-night show, which typically attracts an average of 1.42 million nightly viewers, ABC said.
“Jimmy Kimmel Live!” achieved the ratings milestone, even though the show did not reach about one-quarter of American households. ABC affiliates in several major markets did not carry the show, which aired hours after network parent Walt Disney lifted Kimmel’s suspension.
On social media, the monologue attracted nearly 26 million views, ABC reported. That included 15.3 million views on Alphabet’s YouTube, and another 6.3 million on Meta’s Instagram by late Wednesday afternoon.
His monologue featured video of President Donald Trump speaking from Air Force One, saying the late-night comedian has “no talent” and “no ratings.”
“Well, I do tonight!” said a smiling Kimmel, as the studio audience stood in applause. “You almost have to feel sorry for him.”

PRESSURE FROM TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Kimmel returned to the air six days after his remarks about Kirk’s accused killer provoked social media outrage and pressure from Trump’s administration.
ABC parent Disney’s decision to cut short Kimmel’s exile marked a high-profile act of corporate defiance in the face of Trump’s escalating crackdown on perceived enemies in the media through litigation and regulatory threats. Disney was also under pressure from Kimmel’s fans, some of whom were canceling subscriptions to the company’s streaming services Disney+ and Hulu. Kimmel alluded to that in his monologue, joking that the company had asked him to read some remarks on the air.
“To reactivate your Disney+ and Hulu account, open the Disney+ app on your smart TV or TV-connected device,” he read. Kimmel defended political satire against “bullying” from Trump and officials in his administration. Kimmel’s voice choked with emotion, moments after he took the stage to a standing ovation, and he said: “It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man. I don’t think there’s anything funny about it.”
Last week, Kimmel said Trump’s supporters were eager to characterize Kirk’s assassin “as anything other than one of them” and accused them of trying to “score political points” from Kirk’s killing.
Before Tuesday’s broadcast, Trump said on his Truth Social online platform that he “can’t believe” ABC gave Kimmel back his show, and hinted at further action against the network. Trump’s post called Kimmel “yet another arm” of the Democratic National Committee, and characterized the comedian’s jokes about the Republican administration as “a major illegal Campaign Contribution. I think we’re going to test ABC out on this.” Previously, Trump had said Kimmel was fired for “bad ratings.”
The late-night format has been struggling for years, as more viewers have abandoned cable television and migrated to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller audiences and declining ad revenues for traditional TV.

NEXSTAR OPTS OUT OF KIMMEL
Nexstar Media Group and Sinclair both opted on Tuesday to keep “Jimmy Kimmel Live” off their combined 70 owned and operated ABC stations, which account for about 23 percent of US households. That meant the show was not seen over the air in places like Seattle; Salt Lake City, Utah; Nashville and New Orleans, among other markets. It also did not air in Washington, D.C.
Nexstar said Wednesday that it is evaluating the status of the show, which it will continue to pre-empt on its ABC-affiliated local television stations.
“We are engaged in productive discussions with executives at The Walt Disney Company, with a focus on ensuring the program reflects and respects the diverse interests of the communities we serve,” the company said in a statement.
Still, Disney offers Kimmel’s show for viewing on a number of streaming apps, which are accessible all over the country.
Following Kimmel’s remarks last week, US Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr threatened an investigation of ABC and its affiliates. He urged television stations to drop Kimmel’s show or face possible fines and revocation of their broadcast licenses. “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr said on September 17, which brought calls for his resignation from Democrats and sharp criticism from Republicans including Senator Ted Cruz.
On Wednesday, US Senate Majority Leader John Thune told CNN that programmers should make decisions and the government should not coerce broadcasters, but stopped short of saying either Carr or Trump made mistakes. “This isn’t an area that I think the FCC ought to be wandering into,” Thune said.
In his monologue, Kimmel thanked Cruz and other conservatives who did not support his views but supported his right to express them.
“I don’t think I’ve ever said this before, but Ted Cruz is right,” Kimmel said to a chorus of laughter.