ֱ

Syria on table as migration hawks hold pre-EU summit talks

Syria on table as migration hawks hold pre-EU summit talks
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stands with Greece's Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and other officials on the day of a European Union leaders summit in Brussels, Belgium, December 19, 2024. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 19 December 2024

Syria on table as migration hawks hold pre-EU summit talks

Syria on table as migration hawks hold pre-EU summit talks
  • Since Assad’s ouster a string of EU governments have suspended processing asylum requests from Syria

BRUSSELS: A group of EU immigration hawks held talks ahead of a summit of the bloc’s leaders on Thursday — the second consecutive gathering of its kind — upping pressure on Brussels to boost migrant returns.
Denmark hosted the meeting, co-organized with Italy and the Netherlands, which was attended by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and the leaders of Cyprus, Greece, Malta, the Czech Republic, Poland, Sweden and Hungary.
The upheaval in Syria was one of the issues on the table, as some countries hope the toppling of Bashar Assad will allow for the return home of refugees who fled the country’s civil war.
“If the situation in Syria is such that people can return, we will also work together on that,” Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof told reporters in Brussels.
Since Assad’s ouster a string of EU governments have suspended processing asylum requests from Syria, and Austria said it would look to start sending people back.
The gathering follows a similar get-together held on the sidelines of the previous EU council — the meeting of the bloc’s 27 leaders — in October.
It seems bound to become a stable fixture, with Schoof saying the Netherlands will host the next round of informal talks, and crystallizes the growing influence of the hard right within the bloc.
Migration was top of the agenda in October and will be discussed again on Thursday at the last EU summit of the year.
“It is pretty clear that national leaders are very keen on keeping von der Leyen’s feet to the fire,” said Jacob Kirkegaard, an analyst at Brussels-based think tank Bruegel.
Italy said in a note that von der Leyen updated the group on the commission’s work on a new legal framework to increase and speed up returns of irregular migrants — one of the priorities set out two months ago.
The EU chief, who officially started her second term this month, has promised to deliver a proposal early next year.
Photos shared by Rome, which hosted the first pre-summit meeting, showed von der Leyen, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Greece’s Kyriakos Mitsotakis, Denmark’s’ Mette Frederiksen and others smiling as they huddled around a small table.
Irregular border crossings detected into the European Union are down 40 percent this year after an almost 10-year peak in 2023 — but migration is high on the political agenda following gains by the far right in elections in several countries.


OpenAI and other tech companies warned to improve chatbot safety

OpenAI and other tech companies warned to improve chatbot safety
Updated 4 sec ago

OpenAI and other tech companies warned to improve chatbot safety

OpenAI and other tech companies warned to improve chatbot safety

The attorneys general of California and Delaware on Friday warned OpenAI they have “serious concerns” about the safety of its flagship chatbot, ChatGPT, especially for children and teens.
The two state officials, who have unique powers to regulate nonprofits such as OpenAI, sent the letter to the company after a meeting with its legal team earlier this week in Wilmington, Delaware.
California AG Rob Bonta and Delaware AG Kathleen Jennings have spent months reviewing OpenAI’s plans to restructure its business, with an eye on “ensuring rigorous and robust oversight of OpenAI’s safety mission.”
But they said they were concerned by “deeply troubling reports of dangerous interactions between” chatbots and their users, including the “heartbreaking death by suicide of one young Californian after he had prolonged interactions with an OpenAI chatbot, as well as a similarly disturbing murder-suicide in Connecticut. Whatever safeguards were in place did not work.”
The parents of the 16-year-old California boy, who died in April, sued OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, last month.
The chair of OpenAI’s board, Bret Taylor, said in a statement Friday that the company was “fully committed” to addressing the concerns raised by the attorneys general.
“We are heartbroken by these tragedies and our deepest sympathies are with the families,” Taylor said. “Safety is our highest priority and we’re working closely with policymakers around the world.”
Founded as a nonprofit with a safety-focused mission to build better-than-human artificial intelligence, OpenAI had recently sought to transfer more control to its for-profit arm from its nonprofit before dropping those plans in May after discussions with the offices of Bonta and Jennings and other nonprofit groups.
The two elected officials, both Democrats, have oversight of any such changes because OpenAI is incorporated in Delaware and operates out of California, where it has its headquarters in San Francisco.
After dropping its initial plans, OpenAI has been seeking the officials’ approval for a “recapitalization,” in which the nonprofit’s existing for-profit arm will convert into a public benefit corporation that has to consider the interests of both shareholders and the mission.
Bonta and Jennings wrote Friday of their “shared view” that OpenAI and the industry need better safety measures.
“The recent deaths are unacceptable,” they wrote. “They have rightly shaken the American public’s confidence in OpenAI and this industry. OpenAI – and the AI industry – must proactively and transparently ensure AI’s safe deployment. Doing so is mandated by OpenAI’s charitable mission, and will be required and enforced by our respective offices.”
The letter to OpenAI from the California and Delaware officials comes after a bipartisan group of 44 attorneys general warned the company and other tech firms last week of “grave concerns” about the safety of children interacting with AI chatbots that can respond with “sexually suggestive conversations and emotionally manipulative behavior.”
The attorneys general specifically called out Meta for chatbots that reportedly engaged in flirting and “romantic role-play” with children, saying they were alarmed that these chatbots “are engaging in conduct that appears to be prohibited by our respective criminal laws.”
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, declined to comment on the letter but recently rolled out new controls that aim to block its chatbots from talking with teens about self-harm, suicide, disordered eating and inappropriate romantic conversations, and instead directs them to expert resources. OpenAI also said it would roll out new parental controls, including a method to notify parents “when the system detects their teen is in a moment of acute distress.”
The attorneys general said the companies would be held accountable for harming children, noting that in the past, regulators had not moved swiftly to respond to the harms posed by new technologies.
“If you knowingly harm kids, you will answer for it,” the Aug. 25 letter ends.


Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says

Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says
Updated 3 min 10 sec ago

Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says

Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says
  • The new report focuses more narrowly on the Defense Department and its billions of dollars in annual research funding.

WASHINGTON: Over a recent two-year period, the Pentagon funded hundreds of projects done in collaboration with universities in China and institutes linked to that nation’s defense industry, including many blacklisted by the US government for working with the Chinese military, a congressional investigation has found.
The report, released Friday by House Republicans on the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, argues the projects have allowed China to exploit US research partnerships for military gains while the two countries are locked in a tech and arms rivalry.
“American taxpayer dollars should be used to defend the nation — not strengthen its foremost strategic competitor,” Republicans wrote in the report.
“Failing to safeguard American research from hostile foreign exploitation will continue to erode US technological dominance and place our national defense capabilities at risk,” it said.
The Pentagon and didn’t immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment.
The congressional report said some officials at the Defense Department argued research should remain open as long as it is “neither controlled nor classified.”
The report makes several recommendations to scale back US research collaboration with China. It also backs new legislation proposed by the committee’s chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan. The bill would prohibit any Defense Department funding from going to projects done in collaboration with researchers affiliated with Chinese entities that the US government identifies as safety risks.
The Chinese Embassy on Friday called the report “groundless.” “We oppose it,” the embassy said.
Beijing has in the past said science and technological cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial and helps them cope with global challenges.
Republicans say the joint research could have military applications
The 80-page report builds on the committee’s findings last year that partnerships between US and Chinese universities over the past decade allowed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to help Beijing develop critical technology. Amid pressure from Republicans, several US universities have ended their joint programs with Chinese schools in recent years.
The new report focuses more narrowly on the Defense Department and its billions of dollars in annual research funding.
The committee’s investigation identified 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 that acknowledged support from the Pentagon and were done in collaboration with Chinese partners. The publications were funded by some 700 defense grants worth more than $2.5 billion. Of the 1,400 publications, more than half involved organizations affiliated with China’s defense research and industrial base.
Dozens of those organizations were flagged for potential security concerns on US government lists, though federal law does not prohibit research collaborations with them. The Defense Department money supported research in fields including hypersonic technology, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and next-generation propulsion.
Many of the projects have clear military applications, according to the report.
In one case, a geophysicist at Carnegie Science, a research institution in Washington, worked extensively on Pentagon-backed research while holding appointments at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Hefei Institute of Physical Sciences.
The scientist, who has done research on high-energy materials, nitrogen and high-pressure physics — all of which are relevant to nuclear weapons development — has been honored in China for his work to advance the country’s national development goals, the report said. It called the case “a deeply troubling example” of how Beijing can leverage US taxpayer-funded research to further its weapons development.
In a statement, Carnegie Science said it complies with all US laws. “The work cited was fundamental research, publicly available, and entirely unclassified. This research focused on basic properties of matter related to planetary science,” the institute said.
Carnegie Science also disputed the report’s assertion that the work was funded by the Pentagon, saying it came from the National Science Foundation’s Major Research Instrumentation program.
In another Pentagon-backed project, Arizona State University and the University of Texas partnered with researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Beihang University to study high-stakes decision-making in uncertain environments, which has direct applications for electronic warfare and cyber defense, the report said. The money came from the Office of Naval Research, the Army Research Office and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
The Shanghai university is under the supervision of a central Chinese agency tasked with developing defense technology, and Beihang University, in the capital city of Beijing, is linked to the People’s Liberation Army and known for its aerospace programs.
Calls for scaling back research collaborations
The report takes issue with Defense Department policies that do not explicitly forbid research partnerships with foreign institutions that appear on US government blacklists.
It makes more than a dozen recommendations, including a prohibition on any Pentagon research collaboration with entities that are on US blacklists or “known to be part of China’s defense research and industrial base.”
Moolenaar’s legislation includes a similar provision and proposes a ban on Defense Department funding for US universities that operate joint institutes with Chinese universities.
A senior Education Department official said the report “highlights the vulnerability of federally funded research to foreign infiltration on America’s campuses.” Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said the findings reinforce the need for more transparency around US universities’ international ties, along with a “whole-of-government approach to safeguard against the malign influence of hostile foreign actors.”
House investigators said they are not seeking to end all academic and research collaborations with China but those with connections to the Chinese military and its research and industrial base.


Trump says US in ‘very deep’ negotiations with Hamas, urges release of hostages

Trump says US in ‘very deep’ negotiations with Hamas, urges release of hostages
Updated 12 min 7 sec ago

Trump says US in ‘very deep’ negotiations with Hamas, urges release of hostages

Trump says US in ‘very deep’ negotiations with Hamas, urges release of hostages
  • Trump urges Hamas to release all hostages in Gaza
  • Trump had promised quick end to war

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Washington was in “very deep” negotiations with Palestinian militant group Hamas and urged them to release all hostages held in Gaza.
“We are in very deep negotiation with Hamas,” Trump told reporters, saying the situation will be “tough” and “nasty” if Hamas continues to hold Israeli hostages.
“We said let them all out, right now let them all out. And much better things will happen for them but if you don’t let them all out, it’s going to be a tough situation, it’s going to be nasty,” Trump said, adding that Hamas was “asking for some things that are fine.”
Trump did not elaborate further.
Palestinian militants took over 250 hostages into Gaza after an October 2023 attack in Israel that killed about 1,200 people, according to Israeli tallies.
US ally Israel’s ensuing assault on Gaza has killed tens of thousands of people, internally displaced Gaza’s entire population and prompted accusations of genocide and war crimes at international courts and from several rights groups. Israel denies the accusations.
Trump had promised a quick end to the war in Gaza during his presidential campaign but a resolution has been elusive.
About 50 Israeli hostages are still being held by Hamas in Gaza, with 20 thought to be still alive.
Hamas has said it would release some hostages for a temporary ceasefire while Trump has repeatedly said he wants the release of all hostages.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the war in Gaza would only end if all hostages were released, Hamas was disarmed, Israel established security control over the enclave, and an alternative civilian administration set up. Hamas is demanding an end to the war and Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza.


Trump calls Florida’s vaccine plan a ‘tough stance’; says vaccines that work should be used

Trump calls Florida’s vaccine plan a ‘tough stance’; says vaccines that work should be used
Updated 16 min 42 sec ago

Trump calls Florida’s vaccine plan a ‘tough stance’; says vaccines that work should be used

Trump calls Florida’s vaccine plan a ‘tough stance’; says vaccines that work should be used

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Florida’s plan to end all state vaccine mandates was a “tough stance” and said there are vaccines that work and people should take them.
“I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don’t have to be vaccinated. It’s a very ... tough position,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, when asked about Florida’s announcement this week.
“You have vaccines that work. They just pure and simple work. They’re not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used, otherwise some people are going to catch it, and they endanger other people,” he said.


‘The truth will be revealed’: Gaza Tribunal concludes with condemnation of UK foreign policy

‘The truth will be revealed’: Gaza Tribunal concludes with condemnation of UK foreign policy
Updated 05 September 2025

‘The truth will be revealed’: Gaza Tribunal concludes with condemnation of UK foreign policy

‘The truth will be revealed’: Gaza Tribunal concludes with condemnation of UK foreign policy
  • Experts in international law, medicine, history, politics, journalism speak at unofficial inquiry
  • ‘We’ve given history a repository of how British complicity has been designed,’ says co-chair

LONDON: Experts in the fields of international law, medicine, history, politics and journalism have unanimously condemned UK policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the Gaza Tribunal, which took place in London on Sept. 4-5.

The tribunal was chaired by independent MP Jeremy Corbyn, former leader of the governing Labour Party.

Speakers examined allegations of genocide and war crimes against Israel, and the UK’s potential complicity in them.

At the conclusion of the tribunal on Friday, experts condemned British complicity, including through regular weapons supplies to Israel and the use of surveillance flights over Gaza, through which intelligence is shared with the Israeli military.

Shahd Hammouri, a lecturer in international law and one of the co-chairs of the tribunal, said: “We’ve seen the evidence, the blood on their hands. Accountability is coming. We’ve given history a repository of how British complicity has been designed.”

Former British diplomat Mark Smith addressed the tribunal via videolink. He resigned from the Foreign Office in August 2024 in protest against the UK’s continued arms trade with Israel, and was the lead official on an arms export licensing report.

The investigation led by Smith sought to “assess whether the government is legally compliant in exporting arms to certain countries,” he said, adding that such reports are typically commissioned “when a given country is involved in armed conflict.”

Smith described the working culture at the office as “very strange” and “different to anything I’ve ever experienced in the civil service.”

He said: “Everyone wanted to make it look as though we were on the right side of the law, and any kind of suggestion (otherwise) tended to be met with panic and a kind of extreme pressure to not talk about that.”

Former Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Guillaume Long, an adviser at the Hague Group — the global bloc formed to uphold the International Court of Justice’s rulings on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — condemned what he described as British double standards toward the Gaza war.

The UK has launched significant financial and trade sanctions against Russia, Syria, China and Belarus, now and in the past, but has failed to do so against Israel, “a state currently committing genocide,” he told the tribunal.

“What the UK is doing by ignoring obligations to international law is contributing to the erosion of international law and the erosion of the global social contract.”

He said Britain is in “many regards complicit” in what has taken place in Gaza since October 2023.

Tayab Ali, head of the International Center of Justice for Palestinians, proposed 12 recommendations for the UK to follow in the wake of the tribunal’s findings.

These include the imposition of a total arms embargo on Israel, an end to surveillance flights, a suspension of intelligence sharing, the cancelation of trade agreements and the sanctioning of members of the country’s political class.

The tribunal ended with remarks from Corbyn and the two co-chairs, Hammouri and Neve Gordon, an Israeli peace activist and professor of human rights law at Queen Mary University in London.

Hammouri said: “We live in a world that says that we do have laws. In England, we say this country abides by international humanitarian law.”

She added: “And yet, we forget that there’s a twist there of absolute hypocrisy. How do you commit a livestreamed genocide and still (say) they’re the barbarians, not us?

“We heard horrifying testimonies confirming and affirming the worst that we can ever imagine — accounts that bring to mind untold sorrow. Our job is to ensure truth comes in the present, that accountability doesn’t arrive too late.” She concluded by saying: “The truth will be revealed and justice will prevail.”

Gordon said Britain’s position toward Israel and the Gaza war is based on the “politics of deception,” adding: “We know that the UK government is listening to Israel. We know that the UK government hasn’t opened its doors to the Palestinians. The doors are locked to them but open to the Israelis.”

The UK government has consistently violated its legal obligations in failing to adapt its stance toward Israel amid the Gaza war, he said.

The tribunal’s organizers will now write a joint report on the testimonies heard at the event. The report will be submitted to the government for review.

Corbyn, speaking at the tribunal’s closure, said speakers had exposed truths that are being hidden by the British government and a compliant media.

“I want to say a particular thank you to the Palestinian speakers who’ve been with us the past few days,” he added.

“They have families that are suffering, and they feel a sense of security in being out of the fighting going on in Gaza, but also feel the sense of a need to be there with their friends and family.”