ֱ

How should Arab Americans deal with Trump administration?

Short Url
Updated 24 November 2024

How should Arab Americans deal with Trump administration?

How should Arab Americans deal with Trump administration?
  • Michigan-based businessman Ned Fawaz tells “The Ray Hanania Radio Show” the community should opt for engagement, not boycott
  • Civil rights attorney David Chami sees a double standard that plays down anti-Arab racism while amplifying pro-Israel narratives

CHICAGO: A prominent Arab American businessman from Michigan has called on Arab and Muslim communities to abandon the boycott strategy they adopted during Donald Trump’s first presidency and instead engage with his administration to address pressing issues, including the conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon. However, an Arizona civil rights attorney cautioned that the plea coincides with what he views as a concerning surge in anti-Arab racism and Islamophobia.

Speaking on “The Ray Hanania Radio Show,” Ned Fawaz, president of the Lebanese International Business Council and founder of the American Arab Chamber of Commerce in Michigan; and David Chami, a civil rights attorney representing students sanctioned by Arizona State University for anti-Israel protests, urged the community to prioritize dialogue over boycotts. They acknowledged what they view as Trump’s polarizing reputation and pro-Israel cabinet appointments, and argued that there is a rising tide of hatred toward Arabs and Muslims, but also highlighted the importance of engagement to influence policymaking.

Fawaz said that dialogue is essential to influencing US policy. “It’s bad to boycott. After all, we’re American. We have issues (other than just) the Middle East as well. And I think we should all dialogue and talk, and be ready to communicate with the president, with any administration, because we cannot just sit aside and do nothing.”




Donald Trump meeting with Arab American leaders in Dearborn, Michigan, on Nov. 01, 2024, days before the election./ Getty Images/AFP)

He urged Arab Americans to seize “every opportunity” to push Trump to end the violence and foster a climate for lasting peace, including support for the two-state solution for Palestinians. “Yes, always, negotiation makes better sense than boycotting. We believe in evolution. We do not believe in revolution. So, that’s the way it should be,” Fawaz said, highlighting the importance of engaging with the US president regardless of who holds the office, to address issues affecting both Arab American citizens and the Middle East.

Trump, who defeated Democratic rival Kamala Harris in both the electoral college and by popular vote on Nov. 5, remains a controversial figure in the Arab American community. However, as suggested by a pre-election survey by Arab News, many view Trump as the leader best equipped to end the Gaza conflict, despite his perceived closeness to Israel.

During his first term, Arab Americans overwhelmingly supported Democrat Hillary Clinton during the election and grew frustrated with Trump’s policies in office, including his anti-immigration stances and strong backing of Israel. The community boycotted several key initiatives, such as the 2020 Peace to Prosperity Conference in Bahrain, organized by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, and opposed the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and some Arab states like the UAE, Morocco and Bahrain.




Pro-Palestinian demonstrators protest in support of the Palestinians who have died in Gaza outside of the Arab American National Museum in Dearborn, Michigan, on August 11, 2024. (AFP)

Adding to an already complex geopolitical situation, on Thursday, after months of deliberation, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former defense minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas official Mohammed Deif, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The charges stem from the war in Gaza and the October 2023 attacks that triggered Israel’s extensive offensive in the Palestinian territory.

While the suspects are unlikely to appear before judges at The Hague — since Israel is not an ICC member — the announcement could influence the dynamics of the conflict. The full extent of its repercussions remains unclear.

In an almost bipartisan statement, the US strongly condemned the ICC’s decision, diverging from the more cautious responses of its allies. President Joe Biden called the arrest warrants “outrageous,” saying: “Let me be clear once again: Whatever the ICC might imply, there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.” Mike Waltz, the incoming national security adviser, dismissed the ICC’s credibility, claiming its allegations had been refuted by the US government. “You can expect a strong response to the antisemitic bias of the ICC and UN come January,” he said.




Donald Trump meets with Arab American leaders at The Great Commoner cafe on Nov. 1, 2024 in Dearborn, Michigan, as he campaigned for the community's support for his presidential bid. (Getty Images via AFP)

Fawaz, while analyzing Trump’s potential influence in the region, acknowledged the former president’s unwavering support for Israel and his close alliance with Netanyahu, describing it as a possible obstacle. However, he highlighted Trump’s personal connections to the Arab community, noting that his daughter Tiffany is married to Lebanese American Michael Boulos, whose father, Massad Boulos, was a vocal supporter of Trump and the Arab Americans for Trump group.

However, Fawaz acknowledged the significant challenges posed by Trump’s cabinet selections. Many of his appointees are staunchly pro-Israel and have made controversial statements about Palestinians. These include the former governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee, nominated as US ambassador to Israel, who once claimed that “there is no such thing as Palestinians” and opposes the two-state solution. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, expected to serve as secretary of state, has openly supported Israel’s military actions in Gaza, opposing calls for a ceasefire while advocating for additional funding and weaponry for Israel.

“The secretary of defense also has an extreme Zionist position. I think, even with all of that, we must continue to negotiate, continue the dialogue, to interact with the administration,” Fawaz said, referencing the nomination of Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News host and Iraq war veteran. “Hopefully there will (be) some people who are fair, who are good for the US government, they are good for the US people, good for the taxpayers and they see some fair issue,” he said. “They will not allow this kind of genocide that has taken place in Lebanon or in Gaza.”

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

Since the outbreak of the conflict in October 2023, the US administration has consistently voiced its support for Israel, which has drawn widespread criticism for what many experts describe as excessive use of force. In 14 months of conflict, about 44,000 people, including one-third of them children, have been killed in Gaza, while more than 3,500 deaths have been reported in Lebanon, many caused by US-made and supplied weapons.

Speaking on a separate segment of the show, attorney Ahmad Chami claimed that there has been a surge in anti-Arab racism and Islamophobia, which he said is not an aberration, but a continuation of systemic hostility toward Arab and Muslim Americans, exacerbated by Israel’s wars in Gaza and Lebanon. Chami criticized the inconsistent responses of US politicians, claiming they are quick to act against discrimination targeting other groups but hesitant to address anti-Arab racism or Islamophobia for fear of being labeled antisemitic.

“We are too easily the villains for our government and our media,” Chami said, citing the Arizona State University lawsuit as an example of the suppression of pro-Palestinian protests. “We’re so worried about the perception that this anti-Israeli policy protest is going to have on the poor innocent Jewish Americans that we are willing to suppress free speech, and pass bills, and attempt to pass bills labeling Students for Justice in Palestine as ‘terrorist sympathizers’.”




Counter demonstrators stand outside the University of Maryland campus in College Park, Maryland, display a placard labeling the Students for Justice in Palestine as Hamas sympathizers for opposing the Israeli war on Gaza nd Lebanon. (Getty Images via AFP)

Chami described this as a double standard that minimizes public attention to anti-Arab racism while amplifying narratives that favor Israel, and pointed to a rise in hate crimes against Arabs and Muslims in the US — an increase of 71 percent in the first half of 2024, according to Chami — that has been “vastly underreported.”

Citing the recent attack by a 64-year-old Jewish woman in Downers Grove, a suburb of Chicago, Illinois, who verbally and physically assaulted a Muslim man and his pregnant wife at a coffee shop because the husband was wearing a sweatshirt with the word “Palestine” on it, Chami argued that this atmosphere allows people to “feel protected and emboldened” to attack Arabs or Muslims with impunity.

“That is a systematic problem,” he said. “That is a problem with our government allowing these people to feel like, I can attack an Arab, I can attack someone I perceive as Muslim or even pro-Palestinian, and I’ll be fine.”

Chami linked this environment to political factors portraying Arabs and Muslims as terrorists, which he said devalues Arab and Muslim lives while elevating those of pro-Israel or Jewish individuals. Chami also revealed that documents from his lawsuit against Arizona State University suggest the Anti-Defamation League lobbied university officials to treat anti-Israel protests as acts of violence.




This combination of pictures created on November 12, 2024 shows some of the nominees of US President-elect Donald Trump to key posts in his incoming administration. Trump has not picked any Arab-American nominee so far, despite their strong support for him during the Nov. 5 US presidential election. (AFP/File)

“They (ADL) call themselves a civil rights organization, but they’re very clearly, in my view, an organization that is a political organization that is intended to protect not only Jewish Americans, but more importantly, Israeli interests,” Chami said, accusing the group of pressuring institutions like the ASU to silence pro-Palestinian voices.

Fawaz echoed the need for change at both local and international levels, pointing to Trump’s administration as a potential avenue for such transformation. “Change is always possible,” he said, citing Trump’s frequent cabinet reshuffles during his first term. While Trump has yet to appoint Arab Americans to key roles, Fawaz said that there are many qualified individuals in the community. “There are some capable Arab Americans in politics, all over the US,” he said. “And he can select someone who is fair, who can be our voice.”

He also highlighted efforts by Massad Boulos to act as a liaison between Trump and the Lebanese community. “We hope Boulos succeeds and secures a position where he can make a difference,” he said.

Although Biden initiated outreach to Arab Americans during his first year in office and appointed two dozen Arab Americans to White House and State Department roles, Fawaz criticized the administration for curbing their influence by barring them from speaking publicly on Middle East issues. He expressed hope that this would change under Trump’s leadership, though, in this increasingly intricate political landscape, much remains to be seen.


UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse
Updated 54 min 16 sec ago

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse
  • Unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, including famine, is result of decisions that defy ‘basic humanity,’ says Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
  • He demands Israel abide by provisional measures issued by International Court of Justice and lift the blockade on aid

NEW YORK CITY: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Thursday condemned the worsening crisis in Gaza. He described “an endless catalog of horrors” in the territory and warned of catastrophic humanitarian consequences, as he called for immediate international action to address the situation and ensure accountability.

Guterres said civilians in Gaza were enduring “yet another deadly escalation” as Israel continues to signal plans for a military takeover of Gaza City. He called this a “new and dangerous phase” of the conflict that would have “devastating consequences,” including the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people already traumatized by months of violence.

“This must stop,” Guterres said. “Gaza is piled with rubble, piled with bodies, and piled with examples of what may be serious violations of international law.”

Citing recent airstrikes, he added that Israeli military operations have killed civilians, medical workers and journalists.

A double Israeli strike on Nasser hospital in Khan Younis killed 20 people on Monday, including health workers and journalists. At least one person was killed by the initial strike, and others in a second minutes later as rescuers and journalists rushed to the scene.

The five journalists who died worked for international media outlets, including the Associated Press, Reuters, Al Jazeera and Middle East Eye.

“These attacks are part of an endless catalog of horrors,” Guterres said. “There must be accountability.”

He also condemned Hamas and other armed groups for taking hostages and subjecting them to “atrocious treatment,” and demanded the immediate and unconditional release of all those being held.

He described the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza as beyond critical, warning that famine was no longer a looming threat but “a present-day catastrophe.” He said civilians were dying from hunger, women were giving birth under extreme conditions, and essential services such as water, healthcare and food systems had been “systematically dismantled.”

“These are the facts on the ground,” he added. “And they are the result of deliberate decisions that defy basic humanity.”

As the occupying power, Guterres said, Israel has a legal obligation to ensure the population has access to food, water and medical aid. He called for the implementation of binding provisional measures issued by the International Court of Justice, including the facilitation of full and immediate humanitarian access throughout Gaza, in cooperation with the UN.

He noted that 366 UN workers have been killed since the conflict escalated, and that humanitarian efforts were being “blocked, delayed and denied” on a daily basis. “This is unacceptable,” he added.

The secretary-general also addressed the deteriorating situation in the West Bank, citing increased military operations, settler violence and discriminatory policies. He warned that a recently approved plan to expand settlements there could effectively sever the northern West

Bank from the south of the territory, posing what he described as an “existential threat” to a two-state solution.

“I repeat: the Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem have been established, and are being maintained, in violation of international law,” Guterres said. “Israel must cease such actions and comply with its obligations.

“There is no military solution to this conflict. I appeal once again for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, unfettered humanitarian access across Gaza, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.

“Starvation of the civilian population must never be used as a method of warfare. Civilians must be protected. Humanitarian access must be unimpeded. No more excuses. No more obstacles. No more lies.”


UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability

UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability
Updated 51 min 21 sec ago

UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability

UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability
  • ‘Reports of enforced disappearances targeting starving civilians seeking their basic right to food are not only shocking but amount to torture,’ says head of working group
  • Refusal by Israeli authorities to provide information about fate or whereabouts of detainees is a clear breach of international law, the experts say

NEW YORK CITY: A group of UN human rights experts on Thursday condemned what they described as enforced disappearances of Palestinian civilians at food aid distribution sites in Gaza.

They called on Israeli authorities to end this “heinous crime” against an already starving and traumatized population.

“Reports of enforced disappearances targeting starving civilians seeking their basic right to food are not only shocking but amount to torture,” said Gabriella Citroni, the chair-rapporteur of the UN’s Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances.

“Using food as a tool to conduct targeted and mass disappearances needs to end, now.”

The group of experts also included Francesca Albanese, special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 and Michael Fakhri, special rapporteur on the right to food.

They cited reports of individuals, including at least one child, disappearing after visiting aid distribution centers operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in Rafah. These sites, they said, have also come under aerial bombardment and gunfire, resulting in mass casualties among civilians already facing severe hunger.

According to the UN, Israeli forces are operating in and around these aid-distribution areas and are allegedly involved in detentions and disappearances of people seeking humanitarian assistance.

“We are particularly concerned that, once again, the Palestinian people have been targeted and punished as such,” said Albanese. “In the most desperate moment of man-made starvation, they are being denied life-saving aid and subjected to further violence.”

The experts warned that the rising number of disappearances at aid sites could deter desperate civilians from seeking food assistance, exacerbating the risk of famine in Gaza. Fakhri said that this represented a fundamental violation of the right to food.

“Enforced disappearances in this context are part of a broader attack on the right to access food and survive,” he added.

The experts accused Israeli authorities of refusing to provide information about the fate or whereabouts of detained individuals, describing this as a clear breach of international law.

“The failure to acknowledge deprivation of liberty by state agents, and refusal to acknowledge detention, constitute an enforced disappearance,” said Citroni.

“This is a violation of the absolute and non-derogable prohibition against enforced disappearances.”

The experts said that such actions must be investigated thoroughly and impartially, and those found to be responsible for them must be held accountable.

“The obligation to investigate and punish enforced disappearances is a jus cogens (compelling law) norm of international law,” said Ana Lorena Delgadillo Perez, a member of the working group.

“It must not be delayed or obstructed under any circumstances.”

The experts also raised concern over the reliance by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation on private military security contractors at its aid distribution sites.

Aua Balde, another member of the working group, described the current GHF arrangement as an “inhumane aid system” and called for it to be immediately dismantled in favor of a UN-led humanitarian mechanism.

Special rapporteurs are part of what is known as the special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council. They are independent experts who work on a voluntary basis, are not members of UN staff and are not paid for their work.


UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades

UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades
Updated 56 min 38 sec ago

UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades

UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades
  • UN Security Council votes unanimously for UNIFIL a final extension until the end of 2026
  • Resolution says aim is to make the Lebanese government 'the sole provider of security' in southern Lebanon

UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council voted unanimously on Thursday to terminate the UN peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon at the end of next year after nearly five decades, bowing to demands from the United States and its close ally Israel.
The United States, which initially demanded that the force be ended in six months and later sought a one-year final extension, voted in favor of a final 16-month mandate to continue its activities near Lebanon’s UN-drawn border with Israel.
The multinational peacekeeping force has played a significant role in monitoring the security situation in southern Lebanon for decades, including during the Israel-Hezbollah war last year, but it has drawn criticism from both sides and numerous US lawmakers, some of whom now hold prominent roles in President Donald Trump’s administration or wield new influence with the Republican White House.
The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon after Israel’s 1978 invasion. Its mission was expanded following the monthlong 2006 war between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah.
The resolution gives the force, known as UNIFIL, a year starting on Dec. 31, 2026, to withdraw its 10,800 military and civilian personnel and all UN equipment. During this period, UNIFIL was authorized to carry out a few limited activities.
The resolution says the aim is to make the Lebanese government “the sole provider of security” in southern Lebanon north of the UN-drawn border with Israel known as the Blue Line. It calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from north of the Blue Line.
Trump administration political appointees came into office wanting to shut down UNIFIL as soon as possible and have secured major cuts in US funding for the force.
They regard the operation as a waste of money that is merely delaying the goal of eliminating Hezbollah’s influence and restoring full security control to the Lebanese armed forces. The government says its forces are not yet capable of assuming full control.
European nations, notably France and Italy, objected to winding down UNIFIL too quickly. They argued that ending the peacekeeping mission before the Lebanese army was able to fully secure the border area would create a vacuum Hezbollah could easily exploit.
During the one-year withdrawal period, the resolution says, UNIFIL is authorized to provide security and assistance to UN personnel, “to maintain situational awareness in the vicinity of UNIFIL locations,” and to contribute to the protection of civilians and the safe delivery of humanitarian aid “within the limits of its capacities.”
The resolution urges the international community “to intensify its support, including equipment, material and finance” to the Lebanese armed forces.


Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights

Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights
Updated 28 August 2025

Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights

Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights
  • Ramez Dimashkieh, head of the Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee said his group is working on proposed legislation that they hope to introduce by the end of the year
  • The proposed legislation under being drafted would not confer Lebanese nationality on the refugees

BEIRUT: As more Palestinian refugee camps handed over caches of weapons to the Lebanese army this week, a Lebanese government official told The Associated Press that the disarmament effort could pave the way for granting Palestinian refugees in Lebanon more legal rights.

Ramez Dimashkieh, head of the Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee, a government body that serves as an interlocutor between Palestinian refugees and officials, said his group is working on proposed legislation that they hope to introduce by the end of the year that could improve the situation of Lebanon’s approximately 200,000 Palestinian refugees.

Palestinian refugees in Lebanon are not given citizenship, ostensibly to preserve their right to go back to the homes they fled or were forced from during the 1948 creation of the state of Israel, which now bans them from returning. They are prohibited from working in many professions, have few legal protections and can’t own property.

The proposed legislation under being drafted would not confer Lebanese nationality on the refugees, Dimashkieh said, but would strengthen their labor and property rights.

“If people see a serious move forward in terms of arms delivery and they see the Palestinians here … are serious about transforming into a civil society rather than militarized camps, it will make the discourse much easier,” he said.

A first step

Last week, Palestinian factions started handing over some of the weapons held in the Burj Al-Barajneh refugee camp on the outskirts of Beirut to the Lebanese army, an initial step in implementing a plan announced by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun three months earlier for removing arms from the camps.

The step of removing weapons from the camps was widely seen as a precursor to the much more difficult step of disarming the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, which last year fought a bruising war with Israel. The group has been under domestic and international pressure since then to give up its remaining arsenal, which it has so far refused to do.

Only one pickup truck loaded with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades left Burj Al-Barajneh last week, leading many to dismiss the initiative in the Palestinian camps as ineffective or purely symbolic.

Dimashkieh acknowledged that “there was a lot of cynicism about the quantity and quality of the weapons delivered,” but insisted that the government is serious about following through.

“Whatever weapons are given, they’re weapons which are now in the possession of the Lebanese Armed Forces,” he said. “So we should be happy about that.”

On Thursday, another three camps in southern Lebanon handed over weapons, including some Grad rockets as well as RPGs, machine guns and hand grenades.

A move toward civil administration

The 12 Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon aren’t under the control of Lebanese authorities, and rival Palestinian factions have clashed inside the camps in recent years, inflicting casualties and affecting nearby areas.

In the Ein el Hilweh camp near the southern port city of Sidon, rounds of fighting between members of Abbas’s Fatah movement and rival Islamist factions in 2023 killed around 30 people, wounded hundreds and displaced thousands.

The fighting also left the schools in one of two school complexes in the camp run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees “heavily damaged to the extent that we are unable to use them,” said Dorothee Klaus, UNRWA director in Lebanon. The cash-strapped agency does “not have the resources currently to reopen the schools,” she said.

While UNRWA is not involved in the disarmament effort currently underway, Klaus said, “We very much hope that this leads to a situation of safety and security and stability with a functioning civil administration.”

Eventually, Dimashkieh said, the objective is for the camps to be patrolled by Lebanese police or internal security forces while being governed by civilian Palestinian officials, although he acknowledged that there would be “a transitional period” before that happens.

Abbas’s administration launched an overhaul of the Palestinian Authority’s leadership in Lebanon a few months ago, including the removal of the former Palestinian ambassador and many security officials and staff. Dimashkieh said that a Palestinian delegation had recently visited to pave the way for elections of new “popular committees” that serve as de facto municipal authorities in the camps.

Palestinian factions opposed to Abbas, including Hamas and its allies, have rejected the plan to hand over weapons in the camps, and even members of Abbas’ Fatah movement have sent mixed signals, with some officials saying last week that only “illegal” weapons would be handed over, not those belonging to organized factions.

However, on Thursday, Sobhi Abu Arab, the head of the Palestinian National Security Forces in
Lebanon, said, “We are doing our part as the Fatah movement and the Palestinian Liberation Organization to implement” Abbas’s decision.

Dimashkieh said his group has also had “initial talks” with Hamas and that he is “quite optimistic that we will make headway” with bringing them on board.


Israeli strikes hit Yemen’s Sanaa for second time in a week

Israeli strikes hit Yemen’s Sanaa for second time in a week
Updated 29 min 55 sec ago

Israeli strikes hit Yemen’s Sanaa for second time in a week

Israeli strikes hit Yemen’s Sanaa for second time in a week
  • Israeli security sources said it had targeted various locations where a large number of senior Houthi officials had gathered to watch a speech by their leader

SANAA: Israel struck at Houthi militants in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa on Thursday, the Israeli military said, in the second such assault on the city in less than a week.

Residents told Reuters the attacks struck an area near the presidential complex and a building in southern Sanaa.

Yemeni military sources said the presidential complex housed an operations room and a missile storage facility used by the Iran-aligned militants. An Israeli military statement referred to a single attack.

Israeli security sources said it had targeted various locations where a large number of senior Houthi officials had gathered to watch a televised speech recorded by leader Abdul Malik Al-Houthi.

But a source from the Houthi Ministry of Defense denied reports of leaders being targeted in Sanaa, the Houthi-run news agency reported.

“Whoever raises a hand against Israel — his hand will be cut off,” Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a statement on Thursday.

On Sunday, Israel said it had hit the city in retaliation for Houthi missiles fired toward Israel.

The strikes are the latest in more than a year of attacks and counterstrikes between Israel and Houthi militants in Yemen, part of a spillover from the war in Gaza.

Nasruldeen Amer, a senior Houthi official, said on Thursday the Houthis, who control much of Yemen’s population, would continue to act in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.

The Iran-aligned Houthis have attacked vessels in the Red Sea in what they describe as acts of solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza.

They have also fired missiles toward Israel, most of which have been intercepted. Israel has responded with strikes on Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen, including the vital Hodeidah port.