ֱ

Win the vote but still lose? Behold America’s Electoral College

Win the vote but still lose? Behold America’s Electoral College
Combo image showing Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris campaigning as the Nov. 5, 2024, US election approaches. (AFP photos)
Short Url
Updated 03 November 2024

Win the vote but still lose? Behold America’s Electoral College

Win the vote but still lose? Behold America’s Electoral College
  • What matters most in a US presidential election is who gets more than 270 of the 538 Electoral College votes, regardless of who gets the most popular votes
  • Because many states predictably lean Republican or Democratic, presidential candidates focus heavily on the handful of “swing” states on which the election will likely turn

WASHINGTON: When political outsider Donald Trump defied polls and expectations to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election, he described the victory as “beautiful.”
Not everyone saw it that way — considering that Democrat Clinton had received nearly three million more votes nationally than her Republican rival. Non-Americans were particularly perplexed that the second-highest vote-getter would be the one crowned president.
But Trump had done what the US system requires: win enough individual states, sometimes by very narrow margins, to surpass the 270 Electoral College votes necessary to win the White House.
Now, on the eve of the 2024 election showdown between Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris, the rules of this enigmatic and, to some, outmoded, system is coming back into focus.

The 538 members of the US Electoral College gather in their state’s respective capitals after the quadrennial presidential election to designate the winner.
A presidential candidate must obtain an absolute majority of the “electors” — or 270 of the 538 — to win.

The system originated with the US Constitution in 1787, establishing the rules for indirect, single-round presidential elections.
The country’s Founding Fathers saw the system as a compromise between direct presidential elections with universal suffrage, and an election by members of Congress — an approach rejected as insufficiently democratic.
Because many states predictably lean Republican or Democratic, presidential candidates focus heavily on the handful of “swing” states on which the election will likely turn — nearly ignoring some large states such as left-leaning California and right-leaning Texas.
Over the years, hundreds of amendments have been proposed to Congress in efforts to modify or abolish the Electoral College. None has succeeded.
Trump’s 2016 victory rekindled debate. And if the 2024 race is the nail-biter that most polls predict, the Electoral College will surely return to the spotlight.

Who are the electors?

Most are local elected officials or party leaders, but their names do not appear on ballots.
Each state has as many electors as it has members in the US House of Representatives (a number dependent on the state’s population), plus the Senate (two in every state, regardless of size).
California, for example, has 54 electors; Texas has 40; and sparsely populated Alaska, Delaware, Vermont and Wyoming have only three each.
The US capital city, Washington, also gets three electors, despite having no voting members in Congress.
The Constitution leaves it to states to decide how their electors’ votes should be cast. In every state but two (Nebraska and Maine, which award some electors by congressional district), the candidate winning the most votes theoretically is allotted all that state’s electors.

How do electors vote?

In November 2016, Trump won 306 electoral votes, well more than the 270 needed.
The extraordinary situation of losing the popular vote but winning the White House was not unprecedented.
Five presidents have risen to the office this way, the first being John Quincy Adams in 1824.
More recently, the 2000 election resulted in an epic Florida entanglement between Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore.
Gore won nearly 500,000 more votes nationwide, but when Florida — ultimately following a US Supreme Court intervention — was awarded to Bush, it pushed his Electoral College total to 271 and a hair’s-breadth victory.

Nothing in the Constitution obliges electors to vote one way or another.
If some states required them to respect the popular vote and they failed to do so, they were subjected to a simple fine. But in July 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that states could impose punishments on such “faithless electors.”
To date, faithless electors have never determined a US election outcome.

When do electors vote?

Electors will gather in their state capitals on December 17 and cast votes for president and vice president. US law states they “meet and cast their vote on the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December.”
On January 6, 2025, Congress will convene to certify the winner — a nervously watched event this cycle, four years after a mob of Trump supporters attacked the US Capitol attempting to block certification.
But there is a difference. Last time, it was Republican vice president Mike Pence who, as president of the Senate, was responsible for overseeing the certification. Defying heavy pressure from Trump and the mob, he certified Biden’s victory.
This time, the president of the Senate — overseeing what normally would be the pro forma certification — will be none other than today’s vice president: Kamala Harris.
On January 20, the new president is to be sworn in.


IRA bomb victims in UK should be compensated with Qaddafi asset money: Report

IRA bomb victims in UK should be compensated with Qaddafi asset money: Report
Updated 5 sec ago

IRA bomb victims in UK should be compensated with Qaddafi asset money: Report

IRA bomb victims in UK should be compensated with Qaddafi asset money: Report
  • Frozen funds, which earn UK Treasury around £5m a year, recommended to be set aside
  • IRA used Semtex supplied by ex-Libyan regime in bombings in 1980s, 1990s

LONDON: Victims of IRA bombings should receive compensation from tax on assets seized from the regime of the late Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, according to a report by former Charity Commission Chairman William Shawcross.

The report suggests that the funds on offer will not go far enough to compensate all victims adequately, but should still be set aside for the purpose by the Treasury.

The IRA used Semtex, a plastic explosive, supplied by Libya to conduct bombings in the 1980s and 1990s.

Qaddafi’s assets were frozen after the fall of his regime in 2011, with victims saying they have grown in value from £9 billion ($12 billion) to £17 billion, earning the Exchequer around £5 million annually in tax.

Shawcross wrote in his report: “Funding could be obtained from the tax accrued on the frozen Libyan assets but will probably be insufficient, depending on the solution chosen. Other sources of government funding will probably be required.”

He added that it is “not possible to identify the number of people affected” by IRA bombings backed by Qaddafi, and that the number may continue to rise.

The Treasury, he said, should make up any shortfall owed to them and strike a deal with the current Libyan authorities over unfreezing assets, but this “may not transpire.”

He added: “It is time to draw a line. The pain and suffering of the victims is real and harrowing; it has been compounded by the length of time this matter has been under discussion and that victims have waited for the redress they believe is due to them, partly because they have been encouraged in that belief.”

The report was completed in 2020 but was sat on by successive Conservative and Labour governments before being released on Monday after lobbying by the families of victims.

It had been withheld in part due to the sensitive and in some cases classified nature of information it contained.

Susanne Dodd, whose father Stephen Dodd died in the bombing of Harrods department store in London by the IRA in 1983, said: “I would like to see the tax from the Libyan assets ring-fenced and given to victims’ families. That should include all the tax brought in so far.

“We believe the Treasury raised £5 million last year and over almost 15 years that’s a lot of money.”


Austria deports Afghan, a first since 2021

Austria deports Afghan, a first since 2021
Updated 21 October 2025

Austria deports Afghan, a first since 2021

Austria deports Afghan, a first since 2021
  • The Alpine nation is one of 20 EU member states which have urged the European Commission to take action to enable both voluntary and forced returns of Afghans with no legal right to stay

VIENNA: Austria — one of the European Union members pushing for deportations of Afghans and Syrians — on Tuesday deported an Afghan man, the first such removal since 2021.
The Alpine nation is one of 20 EU member states which have urged the European Commission to take action to enable both voluntary and forced returns of Afghans with no legal right to stay.
In July, it also became the first EU country in recent years to deport a Syrian.
It has since sent two other Syrians back to their home country, where long-time strongman Bashar Assad was ousted in December.
A 31-year-old Afghan, who served four years in jail over a sexual offense and causing grievous bodily harm, was deported from Vienna via Istanbul to Kabul, Austria’s interior ministry said.
This was the first such deportation since summer 2021, it said, adding that more deportations of criminal convicts were being prepared.
Austria’s conservative-led government received Taliban government representatives in Vienna in September, drawing criticism from rights group and the opposition Greens.
The Taliban have been largely isolated on the global stage since they imposed a strict version of Islamic law after they returned to power in Afghanistan in 2021, following the withdrawal of US-led forces.
Lawyers for the Afghan, who came to Austria as an unaccompanied minor, failed to obtain a court order to stop his deportation on the grounds that he suffered “severe psychological impairment,” according to rights group Asylkoordination Austria.
“We are concerned... that there is no follow-up on what actually happens to the people” who are deported, spokesman Lukas Gahleitner-Gertz told AFP.
They could face “torture or inhumane treatment” in their home countries, he said.
The EU said on Monday it has “initiated exploratory contacts” with the Taliban government in Afghanistan, in the face of pressure from EU member states to increase deportations of failed asylum seekers.
Germany has deported more than 100 Afghans since last year.


Cable that broke in Lisbon rail crash was uncertified, report shows

Cable that broke in Lisbon rail crash was uncertified, report shows
Updated 21 October 2025

Cable that broke in Lisbon rail crash was uncertified, report shows

Cable that broke in Lisbon rail crash was uncertified, report shows
  • The yellow tram-like carriage hit a building after leaving the track on September 3
  • Gloria is one of three old funiculars operated by the municipal public transport company Carris

LISBON: The cable that snapped and caused a Lisbon funicular railcar to hurtle down a hill in September, killing 16 people, was not certified for use in passenger transport, according to a preliminary report that also pointed to maintenance flaws.
Portugal’s Office for Air and Rail Accident Investigations (GPIAAF) said in the report late on Monday it was still impossible to say whether the use of an inadequate cable had caused the crash, as other factors were also at play.
GPIAAF’s final report is due by next September.
The yellow tram-like carriage, which carries people up and down a steep hillside in the Portuguese capital, hit a building after leaving the track on September 3.
Gloria, which opened in 1885, is one of three old funiculars operated by the municipal public transport company Carris, which suspended their use after the incident. The line carried around 3 million tourists and locals a year.
GPIAAF said the maintenance procedures, designed by Carris, have not been updated for many years and “the use of cables that did not comply with the specifications and usage restrictions was due to several accumulated failures in the process of acquiring, accepting, and using them by Carris.”
Carris’ internal control mechanisms “were not sufficient or adequate to prevent and detect such failures.”
Carris has outsourced maintenance of the elevator since 2007 and the GPIAAF also identified deficiencies in this area.
“There is evidence that maintenance tasks recorded as completed do not always correspond to the tasks actually performed,” it said.
Carris said in a statement “it is not possible at this stage to say whether the nonconformities in the use of the cable are relevant to the accident or not.”


French police may nab Louvre thieves but unlikely to recover their loot

French police may nab Louvre thieves but unlikely to recover their loot
Updated 21 October 2025

French police may nab Louvre thieves but unlikely to recover their loot

French police may nab Louvre thieves but unlikely to recover their loot
  • Manhunt underway for perpetrators of Louvre heist
  • Museum thefts on the rise in France and around Europe

PARIS: Crime gangs around Europe are increasingly robbing valuable jewels and gold from cash-needy museums like the Louvre, but while police often catch the thieves, they struggle to recover the priceless goods, law enforcement and art experts say.
Only a small pool of criminals would be capable of such a job as Sunday’s audacious robbery in Paris and may already be known to police, the specialists say. But the objects themselves could be quickly broken down into component parts and sold on.
“If I steal a Van Gogh, it’s a Van Gogh. I can’t dispose of it through any other channel than an illicit art market,” said Marc Balcells, a Barcelona-based expert in crimes against cultural heritage. “But when I am stealing ... jewelry, I can move it through an illicit market as precious stones.”
The brazen heist of crown jewels from the Louvre, the world’s most visited museum, has been decried by some as a national humiliation and sparked security checks across France’s multitude of cultural sites.
“If you target the Louvre, the most important museum in the world, and then get away with the French crown jewels, something was wrong with security,” said art investigator Arthur Brand.
Officials at the Louvre, home to artworks such as the Mona Lisa, had in fact already sounded the alarm about lack of investment.
And at least four French museums have been robbed in the last two months, according to media reports.
On Tuesday, prosecutors said they had charged a Chinese-born woman for the theft of six gold nuggets worth about €1.5 million ($1.75 million) from Paris’s Museum of Natural History last month. She was arrested in Barcelona trying to dispose of some melted gold, they said.
Christopher Marinello, founder of Art Recovery International, which tracks stolen art, said museum heists were on the rise across Europe and further afield.
He cited cases in the Netherlands, France, Egypt.
“If you have jewels or gold in your collections, you need to be worried,” Marinello said.
Whodunnit?
Paris prosecutors have entrusted the investigation to a specialized Paris police unit known as the BRB, which is used to dealing with high-profile robberies.
Former police officer Pascal Szkudlara, who served in the unit, said the BRB handled the 2016 Kim Kardashian probe, when Paris thieves stole her $4 million engagement ring, as well as a recent spate of kidnappings of wealthy crypto bosses.
He said the BRB has about 100 agents, with over a dozen specialized in museum thefts. Investigators will look at video footage, telephone records, and forensic evidence, while informants will also be activated.
“They can have teams working on it 24/7 and for a long period,” Szkudlara said, expressing “100 percent” confidence the thieves would be caught.
Police will be poring over security footage going back weeks, looking to identify suspicious people casing out the joint, Brand said.
Corinne Chartrelle, who previously worked at the French Police’s Central Office for the Fight against Trafficking in Cultural Property, said the jewels could feasibly end up in a global diamond center like Antwerp where there “are probably people who aren’t too concerned about the origin of the items.”
The diamonds could also be cut into smaller stones and the gold melted down, leaving buyers unaware of their provenance.
If the thieves feel the net closing, they could chuck or destroy the loot altogether.
Police are clearly in a race against time.
“Once they’ve been cut into smaller jewels, the deed is done. It’s over. We’ll never see these pieces again intact,” said Marinello. “It’s a very small percentage, recovering stolen artworks. When it comes to jewelry, that percentage is even less.”
Any theory about the objects being ordered up by a mysterious buyer was laughable, said Brand. “That’s unheard of,” he said. “You only see it in Hollywood movies.”
Cultural authorities across Europe will be looking at how to better secure museums at a time of tight public finances.
Brand said it was impossible to properly safeguard a museum, so the best thing was to slow down the time it takes to steal objects and escape, giving police longer to respond by making windows or display cases thicker, or adding more doors.
“They know they have only five, six minutes to get away with it because after six minutes, the police show up. So if they go into a museum ... and they find out that it takes more than six, seven, eight minutes, they will not do it,” he said.
Finland’s National Gallery Director General Kimmo Leva said financial realities meant tough decisions.
“A tightening everyday economy is, naturally, not the best basis for making the investments needed to mitigate potential threats,” Leva said.


Ukrainians brace for another winter of power cuts as Russia shifts tactics

Ukrainians brace for another winter of power cuts as Russia shifts tactics
Updated 21 October 2025

Ukrainians brace for another winter of power cuts as Russia shifts tactics

Ukrainians brace for another winter of power cuts as Russia shifts tactics
  • Analysts and officials say that this year Moscow has shifted tactics, targeting specific regions and gas infrastructure
  • People are once again pulling out small power stations, charging numerous power banks, and storing bottles of water in their bathrooms

SHOSTKA: As the lights went out in her hometown, 40-year-old Zinaida Kot could not help but think about her next dialysis treatment for kidney disease. Without electricity, the machine that keeps her alive stops working.
Kot is among millions of Ukrainians who are bracing for another winter of power cuts and possibly blackouts as Russia renewed its campaign of attacks on the country’s energy grid. Analysts and officials say that this year Moscow has shifted tactics, targeting specific regions and gas infrastructure.
In some regions — mostly those closer to the front line in the east — the season of buzzing generators has started, as well as long hours of darkness with no power or water. People are once again pulling out small power stations, charging numerous power banks, and storing bottles of water in their bathrooms.
The attacks have grown more effective as Russia launches hundreds of drones, some equipped with cameras that improve targeting, overwhelming air defenses — especially in regions where protection is weaker.
The consequences are already reshaping daily life — especially for those whose survival depends on electricity. For Zinaida Kot, who has been on dialysis for seven years, this is far worse than mere discomfort.
“It is bad. We really worry when there is no electricity,” she said from her hospital bed, connected to a dialysis machine powered by a generator that staff call “not reliable enough.”
“If there’s no treatment, I would die. I would not exist”
Blackout in Shostka
In early October, a Russian strike left the small northern town of Shostka — with a prewar population of nearly 72,000 — without electricity, water, or gas. The town lies just 50 kilometers (31 miles) from the front line in northern Sumy region. Gas service was later restored, and electricity returned for only a few hours each day.
“The situation is challenging,” said Mykola Noha, the mayor of Shostka. Electricity and water are now supplied on a schedule, available for a few hours each day. “And it really worries the residents as we can’t predict power cuts. We fix something and it gets destroyed again. This is our situation.”
Shostka hums with the low growl of generators on rain-dark asphalt, blanketed in yellow leaves. They power cafes, shops, residential buildings, and hospitals. Across town, so-called “invincibility points” offer residents a place to charge devices, warm up, and even rest on cots provided.
The hardest days, locals say, were when there was no gas — no heat or way to cook — and people made meals over open fires in the streets.
At the local hospital, where all stoves are electric, staff built a simple wood-burning oven during the early days of Russia’s invasion, in 2022, when the town came close to occupation. And now it helps to feed at least 180 patients, said Svitlana Zakotei, 57, a nurse who oversees the patients’ meals.
The hospital has spent three weeks running on generators — a costly lifeline that burns half a ton of fuel a day, about 250,000 hryvnias ($5,973) a week, said the hospital’s chief, Oleh Shtohryn. That’s nearly as much as its usual monthly electricity bill.
Power is rationed. In the dialysis ward, lights stay dim so electricity can feed the machines that keep patients alive. One of the eight units burned out because of the blackout — a costly loss the hospital could not afford to replace soon. Still, 23 patients come daily for hourslong treatment.
Russia has new strategy to bomb the energy sites
The crisis in Shostka reflects Russia’s shifting strategy. In 2022–2023, Moscow launched waves of missiles and drones across the country to destabilize Ukraine’s national grid. This year, it is striking region by region.
The recent pattern shows heavier attacks on the Chernihiv, Sumy, and Poltava regions, while Kharkiv, Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Dnipro face less frequent but still regular strikes.
“They’ve had no success hitting the national infrastructure because it’s now much better protected and operators know how to respond,” said Oleksandr Kharchenko, director of the Energy Research Center. “So they’ve decided to refocus and change tactics.”
Front-line regions within about 120 kilometers of combat are the most vulnerable, he said. “These are attacks on civilians who have nothing to do with the war.”
And for Ukrainian energy crews, that means fixing the same lines and stations again and again — from transmission towers to thermal plants — while enduring outages at home.
“But it’s our job. Who else would do it? Nobody else would,” said Bohdan Bilous, an electrical technician. “I want to be optimistic and prepared for any situation, but the reality is extremely cruel right now.”
Svitlana Kalysh, spokeswoman for the regional energy company in Sumy region, said proximity to the front line makes each repair crew a target. “They’re getting better at knowing how to attack,” she said of the Russians. “The real challenge is the complexity (of damage) — no source to draw (electricity) from, no way to transmit, no capacity to distribute,” she said.
Bracing for the upcoming winter
At a switchyard in the Chernihiv region, all seems calm — a woman tends her cabbage patch nearby — but residents are used to the explosions which intensify each year as winter nears.
The switchyard looks like a museum of nearly four years of strikes. Along the main road lined with towering pylons, a crater in the asphalt marks one of the first attacks in 2022.
The latest strike, on Oct. 4, was far more precise and devastating. In the roof of the transformer building, there’s one neat hole near the center, and another in the wall — scars left by Shahed drones.
Sandbags around the building absorbed some shock waves but couldn’t stop a direct hit. Inside, the station is cold and dark but still operating at half capacity. Thousands of homes across Chernihiv remain without steady power.
Workers are already trying to repair the damage, but even under ideal conditions — few air raids, no new strikes — it will take weeks. Each time an alert sounds, crews must leave their posts.
“If you look at this year, it’s one of the hardest,” said Serhii Pereverza, deputy director of Chernihivoblenergo. “We hope for the best and think about alternative ways to supply our customers.”
Kharchenko noted that last year Russia lacked the capacity to launch 500 or 600 drones at once, and the smaller attacks it could mount were largely ineffective.
But this year even when several air-defense points and mobile units surround a facility, the Russians simply overwhelm them — sending about six drones at each defensive position and another 10 directly at the target.
“This year they’ve roughly tripled the scale,” he said. “They’re breaking through individual sites by sheer volume and power.”