ֱ

First migrants sent to Albania for processing are returned to Italy

First migrants sent to Albania for processing are returned to Italy
An Italian coast guard vessel prepares to depart from the port of Shengjin, Albania, to Italy, carrying 12 of 16 migrants intercepted in international waters and sent to the two reception facilities in Albania earlier this week after a court in Rome rejected their detention, on Saturday, Oct, 19, 2024. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 19 October 2024

First migrants sent to Albania for processing are returned to Italy

First migrants sent to Albania for processing are returned to Italy

SHENGJIN: An Italian navy ship on Saturday took back to Italy the first 12 migrants from newly opened asylum processing centers in Albania following a court decision in Rome.
The court ruling on Friday represents an early stumbling block to a five-year deal between Italy and Albania for Tirana to host 3,000 migrants per month picked up by the Italian coast guard. They will be vetted for possible asylum in Italy or to be sent back to their countries.
Italian Premier Minister Giorgia Meloni has hailed it as a new “model” to handle illegal migration.
The court in Rome rejected the detention of 12 of the migrants, arguing they cannot be sent back to their countries or origin — Bangladesh and Egypt — because the court did not deem them to be safe enough.
The Italian navy ship took the 12 from the port of Shengjin, 66 kilometers (40 miles) northwest of the capital Tirana. After arriving there this week, the four other migrants had already been rejected by center staff, two as vulnerable after undergoing health checks and two for being minors.
Each migrant’s detention must be reviewed by special migration courts in Italy under Italian law.
Meloni slammed the judges following the ruling, and said that deeming countries such as Bangladesh and Egypt unsafe means that virtually all migrants would be barred from the Albania program, making it unworkable. Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi said the government would appeal the ruling.
Speaking to reporters during a trip to Lebanon, Meloni said she would convene a Cabinet meeting Monday to discuss the issue.
“We’ll meet to approve some norms that will allow us to overcome this obstacle,” Meloni said. “I believe it’s up to the government and not magistrates to establish which countries can be considered safe.”
Although Bangladesh and Egypt are not at war or facing any large refugee crises, the Rome judges said their decision was based on recent international rulings that consider discrimination or persecution in even a part of a country as grounds for such a determination.
Italy has agreed to welcome those migrants who are granted asylum, while those whose applications are rejected face deportation directly from Albania.
The controversial agreement to outsource the housing of asylum-seekers to a non-EU member country has been hailed by some countries that, like Italy, are experiencing a high level of migrant arrivals.
The agreement was endorsed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as an example of “out-of-box thinking” in tackling the issue of migration into the European Union.
Human rights organizations considered it as setting a dangerous precedent.


EU eyes deeper India alliance despite concern over Moscow ties

Updated 1 sec ago

EU eyes deeper India alliance despite concern over Moscow ties

EU eyes deeper India alliance despite concern over Moscow ties
The European Union and India are in the final stages of negotiating a free trade agreement
India sees promise in the European Union, but also in China and Russia

BRUSSELS: The European Commission set out plans on Wednesday to deepen cooperation with India in fields such as defense, technology and trade, despite tensions over New Delhi’s close ties to Moscow.
The European Union and India are in the final stages of negotiating a free trade agreement, which they aim to conclude by the end of the year.
Negotiations, relaunched in 2022, have gained pace since the re-election of US President Donald Trump. Faced with Trump’s tariffs, both sides have accelerated efforts to foster new alliances.

EU SEES INDIA AS ECONOMIC, DIPLOMATIC PARTNER
For Brussels, that means planned trade agreements with Mexico, South American bloc Mercosur, India and Indonesia. India sees promise in the European Union, but also in China and Russia.
India has increased purchases of Russian oil since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. In the past month Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in China, and its troops joined a Russian-led military exercise. On Friday, US officials called on G7 and EU states to impose tariffs on China and India over Russian oil purchases.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas acknowledged the EU and India had “clear areas of disagreement” that were obstacles to deeper cooperation, but said the bloc did not want to push India into “Russia’s corner.”
“The question is whether we leave this void to be filled by somebody else or we try to fill it ourselves,” she told a press conference. In its document released on Wednesday setting out its vision, the Commission said the EU would further engage with India on curtailing Russia’s military and preventing circumvention of EU sanctions. Despite tensions, the European Commission views India as a fellow upholder of the rules-based multilateral order, and hopes to benefit from its expected rise to become the world’s third largest economy in 2030, the document says.
The EU envisages the two sides negotiating agreements on investment protection and boosting air transport, collaborating on securing supply chains, on green hydrogen, on decarbonization of heavy industry and on research and innovation.
They could also agree a defense and security partnership, as the EU already has with Japan and South Korea, and cooperate in projects in third countries, particularly in Africa and South Asia.

Indonesian president reshuffles Cabinet again in wake of deadly protests

Indonesian president reshuffles Cabinet again in wake of deadly protests
Updated 4 min 3 sec ago

Indonesian president reshuffles Cabinet again in wake of deadly protests

Indonesian president reshuffles Cabinet again in wake of deadly protests
  • Prabowo named retired Lt. Gen. Djamari Chaniago as Indonesia’s new chief security minister
  • Protests called for sweeping reforms across various institutions, including police and military 

JAKARTA: Indonesia’s president carried out a second surprise Cabinet reshuffle on Wednesday, just a week after firing five ministers following deadly anti-government protests.

At least 11 people were killed in mass protests that broke out in Jakarta in late August. Sparked by controversial allowances for lawmakers, rising living costs and inequality, the demonstrations turned violent and spread across the country after an armed police vehicle ran over and killed a 21-year-old delivery driver. 

With protesters demanding sweeping reforms across various institutions, including the police, military and House of Representatives, the demonstrations have posed the biggest challenge yet for the presidency of Prabowo Subianto, who took office last October. 

After replacing his Cabinet members last week — including well-regarded Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati — Prabowo appointed 11 new officials on Wednesday. 

“President Prabowo Subianto officially inaugurated two ministers and three deputy ministers of the Red and White Cabinet for the remainder of the 2024–2029 term,” the presidential secretariat said in a statement after the inauguration ceremony. 

Among the new appointees are Lt. Gen. (retd.) Djamari Chaniago as the new chief security minister, Erick Thohir — former state-owned enterprises minister — as the new youth and sports minister, and Ahmad Dofiri, retired police commissioner general, as a special presidential adviser for public security and order and police reform.

While the Cabinet changes since last week have been significant, some activists, including Amnesty International Indonesia’s Executive Director Usman Hamid, say the reshuffle was disconnected from the protesters’ demands.

“For example, the public has called for civil supremacy and to return the military to the barracks, but the choice of chief security minister reflects the government’s old paradigm of choosing people with a military background,” he told Arab News. 

Even the appointment of a special security adviser did not address the public’s concerns. 

“It doesn’t answer the demands of the people who are hoping that the government and House of Representatives will immediately form an independent commission to investigate the death of 11 people and other human rights violations during the protests,” Hamid said. 

“This reshuffle is nothing more than the circulation of officials among the political elites; it does not address the root issues of policies that the people were protesting against.”  


Poland probes whether own missile hit house during drone intrusion

Poland probes whether own missile hit house during drone intrusion
Updated 12 min 54 sec ago

Poland probes whether own missile hit house during drone intrusion

Poland probes whether own missile hit house during drone intrusion
  • Initial suspicion was that debris from a Russian drone, shot down by Polish air defense, had hit the building
  • The house in the village of Wyryki in the east of the country was hit by an AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missile fired by a Polish F-16 fighter

WARSAW: Polish missile or Russian drone? Poland was investigating Wednesday what kind of projectile damaged a house last week during an intrusion into its airspace by around 20 drones.
Initial suspicion was that debris from a Russian drone, shot down by Polish air defense, had hit the building.
No one on the ground was hurt, but the incident provided some of the most dramatic images of the episode, which escalated tensions between Moscow and the NATO allies — already sky-high over Russia’s invasion of neighboring Ukraine.
Polish media reports now suggest that the house in the village of Wyryki in the east of the country was hit by an AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missile fired by a Polish F-16 fighter that was scrambled to hunt the drones.
“The investigation is in its preliminary stage, and we must wait for expert opinion to determine what type of weaponry damaged this house,” Anna Adamiak, spokeswoman for the national prosecutor’s office, told AFP.
Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has insisted that regardless of what kind of object hit the rural home, responsibility for the incident lies squarely with Moscow.
“All responsibility for the damage caused to the house in Wyryki falls on the perpetrators of the drone provocation, namely Russia,” Tusk declared in a social media post.
“All circumstances of the incident will be communicated to the public, the government, and the president by the relevant services once the investigation is concluded,” he added.
Russia, which launches drone attacks daily against Poland’s neighbor Ukraine, has denied targeting Poland.
According to Adamiak, the investigation into “the violation of Polish airspace” and “endangerment” of people and property concerns all drone intrusions recorded during the night of September 9 to 10.
Poland, a NATO member, and some of its allies deployed aircraft and other military resources to counter the intruding drones, most or all of which were ultimately either shot down or recovered, mainly in the east and center of the country.


UK govt defends France migrants deal after court block

UK govt defends France migrants deal after court block
Updated 18 min 20 sec ago

UK govt defends France migrants deal after court block

UK govt defends France migrants deal after court block
  • “This is one person, it is not going to undermine the fundamental basis of this deal,” Kendall told Times Radio
  • “This decision is disappointing, but it won’t prevent the rest of that deal going ahead”

LONDON: The UK government on Wednesday insisted its one-for-one migrants deal with France would go ahead after the High Court in London blocked the planned deportation of an Eritrean migrant.
The court’s decision poses another setback to plans to stem the flow of irregular migrants crossing the Channel on small boats, as charities warn the UK-France deal will likely face several legal challenges.
“This is one person, it is not going to undermine the fundamental basis of this deal,” government minister Liz Kendall told Times Radio, after the Eritrean, who was scheduled to be flown to France on Wednesday morning, won an 11th-hour reprieve on Tuesday.
“This decision is disappointing, but it won’t prevent the rest of that deal going ahead,” added Kendall.
Lawyers for the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said he faces a “real risk of destitution” if he is sent back to France and brought the case under a scheme which assesses victims of slavery and human trafficking.
A judge granted a 14-day pause to the deportation plans in order for more information to be sought.
Under the “one-in, one-out” deal, the UK can detain and return migrants coming to Britain on small boats if they are deemed ineligible for asylum, including those who have passed through a “safe country” to reach UK shores.
In return, London will accept an equal number of migrants from France who can apply for a UK visa via an online platform under the pilot scheme which came into force in August and is set to run until June 2026.
More than 90 migrants who recently arrived to the UK on small boats have been detained for deportation to France, according to charities.
France will make its first repatriations from Saturday, its interior ministry said.

- ‘Premature’ -

The British returns, which were set to begin early this week, have already seen multiple delays.
Migrants scheduled to be flown from Heathrow Airport to Paris on Air France flights on Monday and Tuesday had their deportations delayed after filing legal claims, according to various charities working with them.
“There’s going to be all sorts of challenges that will be testing the new agreement and where the ground lies,” Pierre Makhlouf from the Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) charity told AFP.
“If the government presumed that the removals would actually take place this week, then they might be premature,” he added.
Under the agreement, those who come to the UK via small boats and are removed to France will be barred from applying for legal routes to re-enter Britain.
“That does mean that those who are here will fight very hard,” said Makhlouf.
Like previous administrations, Starmer’s Labour government has struggled to deter thousands of migrants arriving to UK shores, with more than 31,000 crossing in small boats this year.


Public anger grows in Philippines over multibillion-dollar graft in flood control

Public anger grows in Philippines over multibillion-dollar graft in flood control
Updated 8 min 55 sec ago

Public anger grows in Philippines over multibillion-dollar graft in flood control

Public anger grows in Philippines over multibillion-dollar graft in flood control
  • Corruption in flood mitigation projects estimated to cost more than $2 billion annually
  • Largest protest planned for Sunday, on anniversary of 1972 declaration of martial law

MANILA: Whenever water levels rise near her home in Barangay Del Monte in Quezon City, Robie Yambot sends her children straight to the nearest evacuation center, never knowing how bad the situation may turn.

Living in a wooden house by the creek, the family knows what it means to lose everything to flooding. But what was once a rare event during especially intense monsoon seasons has now become a regular ordeal, and each time, the floods grow more severe.

“It’s no longer like before when the floods came only every few years ... now, it’s almost every month. Every time it rains nonstop, we get flooded, and floods today are different: the water rises quickly,” Yambot told Arab News.

“My children sometimes cry because we don’t know if there will be anything left. When floods come, it’s so fast that we can’t save our belongings in time. We just focus on evacuating.”

During every election season, politicians visit the area and promise help, but over the years they have not delivered any solution.

Despite the government allocating billions of dollars for flood control, there has been no real improvement. In the Philippines — one of the world’s most typhoon-vulnerable countries — this failure has become especially acute as investigations over the past few weeks have uncovered massive corruption in flood prevention and mitigation projects.

“All that money goes into their pockets while poor people like us suffer. We can shout and cry our frustrations, but nothing happens. There’s no justice,” Yambot said.

“There should be accountability, not just endless senate hearings. It’s heartbreaking for families like ours living near the creek. The funds are there, but where did they go?”

Last month, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced that an internal audit of flood control spending had uncovered serious irregularities. Of the 545 billion pesos ($9.54 billion) allocated since 2022, thousands of projects were found to be substandard, lacking proper documentation, or did not exist.

Public Works and Highways Secretary Manuel M. Bonoan resigned soon after the announcement. A congressional investigation has since linked him to a “growing family business” involving government flood control projects.

As several powerful political figures have over the past few weeks been found to be implicated, Marcos last week established another independent commission led by a former supreme court justice and vowed to hold all wrongdoers accountable regardless of their status.

During a senate hearing on Sept. 3, Finance Secretary Ralph Recto said that economic losses due to corruption in flood control projects may have averaged $2.1 billion a year from 2023 to 2025, mainly due to ghost projects.

The findings have ignited public outrage, with activists, former cabinet members, Catholic church leaders, retired generals and anti-corruption watchdogs organizing numerous protests and calling for sweeping criminal prosecution.

A series of large anti-corruption demonstrations is planned across Metro Manila on Sept. 21 — a date that also marks the anniversary of the 1972 martial law declaration by Marcos’s father.

The president on Monday expressed his support for the protests, in which about 100 organizations are expected to take part.

Prof. David Michael San Juan, convener of the civic alliance Tama Na, said that about 100,000 people are expected to join the rally at Luneta, an urban park and main public gathering site in Manila.

“In every administration, there’s always a corruption case. But this time, it’s really terrible because it’s money that is supposed to be used to protect Filipinos from floods,” San Juan told Arab News.

“The Philippines is a victim of extreme climate change, just like many developing countries. So, the situation with flooding in the Philippines is so bad. And it has gotten worse in recent years. This year, it’s even worse. Even those areas that are not usually flooded are now going under water.”

When investigations into the scandal started to reveal the lavish lifestyles of those involved and names of politicians started to pop up, public anger grew.

“This can be considered as the straw that broke the camel’s back,” San Juan said, comparing the demonstrations with similar recent movements in Nepal and Indonesia, where people rose against corruption and misuse of resources.

“Filipinos are realizing that maybe we, too, should do something,” he said. “What the government is doing is not enough, that’s why we have seven demands, including to remove from their position, arrest, and imprison everyone involved in anomalous flood control projects from the time of (former president) Duterte to Marcos and so on.”