ֱ

Albanian port awaits first migrant transfer from Italy

A local resident fishes near the port in Shengjin, on October 15, 2024. (AFP)
A local resident fishes near the port in Shengjin, on October 15, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 October 2024

Albanian port awaits first migrant transfer from Italy

A local resident fishes near the port in Shengjin, on October 15, 2024. (AFP)
  • The five-year deal with Albania, estimated to cost Italy 160 million euros ($175 million) annually, covers adult male migrants intercepted by Italian vessels in international waters, but within Italy’s search and rescue area

SHENGJIN, Albania: The fishermen in Shengjin barely give a look at the temporary cabins built on one side of the Albanian port that Italy considers a groundbreaking scheme in Europe’s campaign against undocumented migrants.
Sixteen men from Bangladesh and Egypt, rescued in the Mediterranean on Sunday, are set to become the first residents at the Shengjin migrant center on Wednesday.
The migrant scheme could be discussed at a European Union summit this week. But Arben Leli is more worried about whether the fish bite.
“I don’t care about migrants, when they arrive, when they leave, what they do,” Leli told AFP as he tended his nets.
“I have the sea, I want to fish, that’s my life,” the 56-year-old added.
Nearby, Dashamira Deda was pulling fish from a net.
The mother-of-two, who works with her husband on a boat, said that “human nature is to think first of ourselves and then of what’s going on around us... the best thing was to leave us alone.”
Deda said the people of Shengjin, with its population of about 8,000, did not want to appear callous, but they have other pressing concerns, including making a living.
“We are just hoping it’s for a good cause without harming our lives,” the 42-year-old added, without even a glance at the center’s high walls.
But this center, and another in nearby Gjader, has been drawing growing European attention since Italy’s Prime Minister Georgia Meloni struck a deal with Albanian counterpart Edi Rama to become the first EU country to create migrant processing centers outside the bloc.
Shengjin’s seaside hotels are a summer tourist draw. But Albania’s third largest port has seen its size reduced by 4,000 square meters (43,000 square feet) so that the migrant camp, protected by high gates and Italian soldiers and police, could be built.
The five-year deal with Albania, estimated to cost Italy 160 million euros ($175 million) annually, covers adult male migrants intercepted by Italian vessels in international waters, but within Italy’s search and rescue area.
An initial screening at sea will determine which migrants are from countries considered “safe,” which could make repatriation simpler.
In Shengjin, migrants will undergo registration and health checks, and then they will be sent to the other center in Gjader to await the processing of asylum claims.
The Gjader facility includes a section for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected, as well as a small jail.
Human rights groups have questioned the protections offered for asylum seekers. Amnesty International has called the centers a “cruel experiment (that) is a stain on the Italian government.”
Meloni on Tuesday called it a “courageous” move that could be set up in other non-EU countries.


After Charlie Kirk’s death, Trump team calls for dismantling leftist groups

After Charlie Kirk’s death, Trump team calls for dismantling leftist groups
Updated 16 September 2025

After Charlie Kirk’s death, Trump team calls for dismantling leftist groups

After Charlie Kirk’s death, Trump team calls for dismantling leftist groups
  • Right-wing groups have pushed the administration to do more than prosecute the shooter

WASHINGTON: Vice President JD Vance and another top official in President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday argued that serving the memory of Charlie Kirk means pursuing left-leaning groups they portray as bent on undermining national unity. Vance, who guest-hosted the slain conservative activist’s livestream show, amplified right-wing calls for a broadside against leftist groups after Kirk was assassinated last week as he addressed college students.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, Vance’s guest on the program, said Kirk’s final message to him called for a coordinated effort against unnamed left-wing groups accused of promoting violence, pledging the federal government would use “every available resource” to dismantle them.
“With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people,” he said. “It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name.”
Later, Miller told reporters at the White House that the Trump administration is looking at holding criminally accountable a network of “nonprofit entities” that organize attacks on law enforcement, use doxxing and supply materials used in riots. He did not provide evidence of such wrongdoing.
The remarks by top Trump administration officials on Monday offered the clearest indication yet of what steps the White House is weighing in response to Kirk’s death. Critics have for days expressed worry that Trump would use Kirk’s assassination as a pretext to crack down on political opponents. Investigators have yet to piece together why the alleged gunman, Tyler Robinson, allegedly shot Kirk on Wednesday. Investigators found messages engraved into four bullet casings, which included references to memes and video game in-jokes, though experts warned that the messages offered no clear indications about a political motivation.
Right-wing groups have pushed the administration to do more than prosecute the shooter.
Vance, who hosted “The Charlie Kirk Show” podcast for more than two hours, went further than other administration officials by naming two institutions: the Open Society Foundations, funded by billionaire and Democratic donor George Soros; and the Ford Foundation, accusing the philanthropic organizations of funding an article in The Nation magazine that he criticized. Both groups said they do not currently fund The Nation.

DISAGREEMENT OVER KIRK’S LEGACY
“I read a story in The Nation magazine about my dear friend Charlie Kirk,” Vance said during the podcast. “George Soros’ Open Society Foundation funds this magazine, as does the Ford Foundation and many other wealthy titans of the American progressive movement.”
Elizabeth Spiers, who wrote the article headlined “Charlie Kirk’s Legacy Deserves No Mourning,” noted she “explicitly stated that no one should ever be killed for their views” in her article and suggested Vance either misunderstood her piece or was deliberately misrepresenting her words to sow division and personally target her.
In her article, Spiers described Kirk as “an unrepentant racist, transphobe, homophobe, and misogynist who often wrapped his bigotry in Bible verses because there was no other way to pretend that it was morally correct.” A number of civil rights advocates have over the years criticized Kirk’s views on Black people, women, the LGBT community, Muslims and immigrants, citing his public comments that they called derogatory and racist. Kirk’s supporters cast him as an influential, charismatic and devout Christian figure committed to civil debate of controversial issues, and credit him with galvanizing younger voters for Trump.
A spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations called Vance’s accusations “disgraceful” and said the group’s work is “entirely peaceful and lawful.” A spokesperson for the Ford Foundation said The Nation has received only a single grant, in 2019, and currently provides no funding to the outlet.
The Nation said it stood by Spiers’ critique of Kirk. “In our 160 years of publication, we’ve long believed that dissent is the highest form of patriotism and we are proud of our journalistic legacy in pursuit of a more equal and just world,” the publication added in a statement.
A wave of violence across the political spectrum has afflicted the United States in recent years, targeting both Democrats and Republicans.
Trump, who has a history of using severe rhetoric against political opponents, blamed the “radical left” almost immediately after Kirk was shot and before a suspect was identified.
On Friday, police arrested 22-year-old Robinson, of Utah, and charged him with Kirk’s murder. State records show Robinson was a registered voter but had no political party affiliation.

 


DNA evidence found near scene of Charlie Kirk’s shooting matches suspect, FBI director says

DNA evidence found near scene of Charlie Kirk’s shooting matches suspect, FBI director says
Updated 16 September 2025

DNA evidence found near scene of Charlie Kirk’s shooting matches suspect, FBI director says

DNA evidence found near scene of Charlie Kirk’s shooting matches suspect, FBI director says
  • Authorities also revealed Monday that a man arrested in the aftermath of the shooting was taken into custody because he yelled, “I shot him, now shoot me”

OREM, Utah: DNA on a towel wrapped around a rifle found near where conservative activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated matched that of the 22-year-old accused in the killing, FBI Director Kash Patel said on Monday.
Investigators also have used DNA evidence to link the suspect, Tyler Robinson, with a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop where the fatal shot was fired, Patel said Monday on the Fox News show “Fox & Friends.”
Authorities in Utah are preparing to file capital murder charges against Robinson as early as Tuesday in the killing of Kirk, a dominant figure in conservative politics who became a confidant of President Donald Trump after founding Arizona-based Turning Point USA, one of the nation’s largest political organizations.
Kirk, who brought young, conservative evangelical Christians into politics, was shot Wednesday while speaking at Utah Valley University during one of his many campus stops. The shooting raised fears about increasing political violence in a deeply polarized United States.
Officials have said Robinson carried a hatred for Kirk and ascribed to a “leftist ideology” that had grown in recent years. Robinson’s family and friends said he spent large amounts of time scrolling the “dark corners of the Internet,” Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said Sunday.
Patel told Fox that Robinson had written in a note before the shooting that he had an opportunity to take out Kirk and was going to do it. Investigators were able to recover the note’s contents after it had been destroyed, the FBI director said, paraphrasing from the note without revealing more details.
Over the weekend, Cox said Robinson’s romantic partner was transgender, but authorities did not know yet whether the suspect targeted Kirk for his anti-transgender views.
Utah’s department of public safety chief said Monday that Robinson’s partner has been cooperative.
“There was a romantic, personal relationship there. We are still investigating whether that individual had any involvement,” commissioner Beau Mason told The Associated Press.
“We believe that Tyler Robinson acted by himself during this shooting,” said Mason, who added that investigators are looking at whether anyone else knew of his plans beforehand.
Authorities said Robinson has not been cooperating with law enforcement since being jailed for suspicion of aggravated murder. They say that he may have been “radicalized” online and that ammunition found in the gun used to kill Kirk included anti-fascist and meme-culture engravings. Court records show that one bullet casing had the message, “Hey, fascist! Catch!”
Robinson was arrested late Thursday near where he grew up around St. George, in the southwestern corner of Utah between Las Vegas and Bryce Canyon and Zion National Parks. It’s unclear whether he has an attorney who could speak on his behalf, and his family has declined to comment to the AP.
Authorities also revealed Monday that a man arrested in the aftermath of the shooting was taken into custody because he yelled, “I shot him, now shoot me.” A probable cause statement said George Zinn later admitted that he only said that “so the real suspect could get away.” A voicemail message left after hours at the office of an attorney who represented Zinn for another case earlier this year was not immediately returned.
Since the shooting, security experts have questioned the level of security at the event, including the number of officers and the decision to hold it outside. Kirk was known to prefer being as close to students as possible during his tour on college campuses, allowing him to strike up conversations with passersby. And with each stop, his level of protection varied greatly.
Tributes to Kirk continued across the country. A line of mourners wrapped around the Kennedy Center in Washington for a vigil Sunday, and there were moments of silence at several professional sporting events.
On Monday, a massive American flag was hung from a walkway just above where Kirk sat before the shooting. Near a flower- and flag-adorned memorial for Kirk close to a university entrance, people had scrawled messages in chalk across the sidewalks — largely bible versus and exhortations to love intermingled with more severe messages. “Bullets can’t stop the truth,” exclaimed one.
Vice President JD Vance, who counted Kirk as a close friend, served as a substitute host Monday on “The Charlie Kirk Show” on Rumble, a streaming platform.
Vance spoke about how Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, told him her husband never raised his voice to her and was never “cross or mean-spirited to her.”
“I took from that moment that I needed to be a better husband and I needed to be a better father,” the vice president said. “That is the way I’m going to honor my friend.”

 


Appeals court rejects Trump’s bid to unseat Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook ahead of rate vote

Appeals court rejects Trump’s bid to unseat Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook ahead of rate vote
Updated 16 September 2025

Appeals court rejects Trump’s bid to unseat Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook ahead of rate vote

Appeals court rejects Trump’s bid to unseat Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook ahead of rate vote

WASHINGTON: An appeals court ruled Monday that Lisa Cook can remain a Federal Reserve governor, rebuffing President Donald Trump’s efforts to remove her just ahead of a key vote on interest rates.
The Trump administration is expected to quickly turn to the Supreme Court in a last-ditch bid to unseat Cook before the Fed meets. And Cook’s lawsuit seeking to permanently block her firing must still make its way through the courts.
The White House campaign to unseat Cook marks an unprecedented bid to reshape the Fed’s seven-member governing board, which was designed to be largely independent from day-to-day politics. No president has fired a sitting Fed governor in the agency’s 112-year history. The ruling comes just before the Fed’s interest rate-setting committee begins a two-day meeting Tuesday. Senate Republicans have confirmed Stephen Miran, Trump’s nominee to an open spot on the Fed’s board.
Trump sought to fire Cook Aug. 25, but a federal judge ruled last week that the removal was illegal and reinstated her to the Fed’s board. Trump appointee Bill Pulte has accused Cook of mortgage fraud because she appeared to claim two properties as “primary residences” in July 2021, before she joined the board. Such claims can lead to a lower mortgage rate and smaller down payment than if one of them was declared as a rental property or second home. Cook has denied the charges.
The case threatens to erode the Fed’s longtime political independence. Economists prefer independent central banks because they can do unpopular things like lifting interest rates to combat inflation more easily than elected officials.


New York’s ban on addictive social media feeds for kids takes shape with proposed rules

New York’s ban on addictive social media feeds for kids takes shape with proposed rules
Updated 16 September 2025

New York’s ban on addictive social media feeds for kids takes shape with proposed rules

New York’s ban on addictive social media feeds for kids takes shape with proposed rules
  • “Children and teenagers are struggling with high rates of anxiety and depression because of addictive features on social media platforms,” James said in releasing the rules, which are subject to a 60-day public comment period
  • Options for confirming a user is at least 18, for example, include requesting an uploaded image or verifying a user’s email address or phone number to check against other information, the office said

NEW YORK: New York’s attorney general on Monday proposed regulations for its crackdown on addictive social media feeds for children, including rules for verifying a user’s age.
The Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act, passed last year, prohibits social media companies from showing feeds personalized by algorithms to users under 18 unless they have a parent’s consent. Instead, feeds on apps like TikTok and Instagram would be limited to posts from accounts young users follow.
The law also bars companies from sending notifications to users under 18 between midnight and 6 a.m.
The proposed rules for implementing the provisions include standards for determining a user’s age and parental consent.
“Companies may confirm a user’s age using a number of existing methods, as long as the methods are shown to be effective and protect users’ data,” Attorney General Letitia James’ office said.
Options for confirming a user is at least 18, for example, include requesting an uploaded image or verifying a user’s email address or phone number to check against other information, the office said.
Users under 18 who want to receive algorithmic feeds and nighttime notifications would have to give the companies permission to request consent from a parent.
Supporters of the law said curated feeds built from user data are contributing to a youth mental health crisis by vastly increasing the hours young people spend on social media.
“Children and teenagers are struggling with high rates of anxiety and depression because of addictive features on social media platforms,” James said in releasing the rules, which are subject to a 60-day public comment period.
Online age check laws — on the rise in the US — have garnered opposition from groups that advocate for digital privacy and free speech. More than 20 states have passed age verification laws, though many face legal challenges.
The New York attorney general’s office noted Instagram and other social media platforms themselves have been implementing various forms of age assurance in recent months.
“The incorporation of age assurance methods into the infrastructure of social media platforms is a positive development that demonstrates the technical and financial feasibility of age assurance methods for these platforms,” the office said. “Unfortunately, voluntary adoption of age assurance methods has not achieved the level of protection of minors required by the (SAFE) Act.”
After the rules are finalized, social media companies will have 180 days to implement the regulations.

 


Trump administration joins Republicans’ campaign to police speech in reaction to Kirk’s murder

Trump administration joins Republicans’ campaign to police speech in reaction to Kirk’s murder
Updated 16 September 2025

Trump administration joins Republicans’ campaign to police speech in reaction to Kirk’s murder

Trump administration joins Republicans’ campaign to police speech in reaction to Kirk’s murder

Vice President JD Vance on Monday jumped onto the conservative movement demanding consequences for those who have cheered Charlie Kirk’s killing, calling on the public to turn in anyone who says distasteful things about the assassination of his friend and political ally.
“When you see someone celebrating Charlie’s murder, call them out,” Vance urged listeners on the slain activist’s podcast Monday. “And hell, call their employer.”
Vance’s call also included a vow to target some of the biggest funders of liberal causes as conservatives stepped up their targeting of private individuals for their comments about the killing. It marked an escalation in a campaign that some warned invoked some of the darkest chapters of American history.
“The government involvement in this does inch this closer to looking like McCarthyism,” said Adam Goldstein of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, referring to the 1950s campaign to root out communists that led to false allegations and ruined careers. “It was not a shining moment for free expression.”
Campaign broadens to those who quote Kirk critically
Republican-controlled states such as Florida, Oklahoma and Texas have launched investigations of teachers accused of inappropriate statements after last week’s assassination on a college campus in Utah. The US military has invited members of the public to report those who “celebrate or mock” the killing and said some troops have already been removed for their comments.
At the same time, the Trump administration has vowed to target what it contends is a “vast” liberal network that inspired the shooter, even as authorities maintain it appears he acted alone and the investigation is ongoing.
The campaign has broadened to include even those whose statements were critical of Kirk without celebrating his assassination.
The Washington Post fired Karen Attiah, an opinion columnist, for posts on the day of the shooting that lamented how “white America” was not ready to solve gun violence and that quoted Kirk denigrating the intelligence of prominent Black women such as Michelle Obama.
Goldstein worried there were many cases like Attiah’s of people targeted for simply quoting Kirk or failing to mourn his passing adequately: “That’s one of the key symptoms of cancel culture,” he said. “Trying to paint everyone with the same brush.”
Conservatives coined the term cancel culture for what they claimed was persecution of those on the right for their views, especially related to the COVID-19 pandemic and Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, leading to campaigns to get regular people fired.
It was a significant cause for President Donald Trump, who pledged to end it during his campaign last year. But after the Kirk killing, he and his administration have instead leaned into it from the right.
A hero to conservatives, a provocateur to many Democrats
A father of two and Christian conservative, Kirk was a hero to many Trump Republicans for his fiery warnings about the dangers of Democrats and ability to organize young voters for the GOP. But Kirk also was a provocateur and supporter of Trump’s attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss who left a long record of partisan quips that enraged many on the left.
“According to Kirk, empathy is a made-up new-age term, so keep the jokes coming. It’s what he would have wanted,” read one post on X that Melvin Villaver Jr., a Clemson University music professor, re-posted the day of the killing, according to a screenshot circulated by college Republicans demanding his firing. Clemson eventually fired one staffer and suspended Earl and another professor after intense pressure from elected South Carolina Republican officials.
Other targeted posters, such as Army Lt. Col. Christopher Ladnier, simply quoted Kirk on the day of his assassination. These included Kirk calling the Civil Rights Act a “beast” that “has now turned into an anti-white weapon,” his criticism of Martin Luther King Jr. and his statement that some gun deaths are the cost of a robust Second Amendment that protects other rights.
Ladnier, who has been targeted by conservative activists online, said in a Facebook message to The Associated Press that he would respond “when/if” his chain of command takes action.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott approvingly posted a video of a student at Texas Tech University on Friday who was arrested after a confrontation at a campus vigil for Kirk, writing: “This is what happened to the person who was mocking Charlie Kirk’s assassination at Texas Tech.”
Top Republicans vow to go after ‘domestic terrorist network’

Authorities say Kirk was shot by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who grew up in a conservative household in southern Utah but was enmeshed in “leftist ideology,” according to the state’s Republican governor, Spencer Cox.
Robinson is expected to appear in court for the first time Tuesday, at which point Cox said investigators may reveal more about what motivated the attack. The governor said the suspect, who allegedly carved memes onto his bullet casings, appeared radicalized by the “dark corners of the Internet.”
On Monday, Vance was joined on Kirk’s podcast by Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, who vowed to crack down on what he called the “vast domestic terrorist network” he blamed for Kirk’s death.
Alluding to free speech concerns, Vance said: “You have the crazies on the far left that say, ‘Oh, Stephen Miller and JD Vance, they’re going to go after constitutionally protected speech.’”
But he added: “No no no! We’re going to go after the NGO network that foments, facilitates and engages in violence,” — a reference to non-governmental organizations.
The White House did not immediately return a request seeking clarity on the remarks, including which groups might be targeted.
The idea of a retribution campaign against individuals or groups for expressing a particular viewpoint has alarmed many.
“Just having that ideology, just believing differently than some other American is not illegal,” Republican Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma said on CNN on Sunday.
Instead, he said any groups that have been involved in illegal or violent acts should be targeted.
Killing as a pretext to go after political rivals
On Kirk’s show, Vance talked about the need for unity after the assassination, but then dismissed it as impossible given what he described as the left’s embrace of political violence.
Democratic officials have roundly condemned Kirk’s murder. Democrats also have been victims of political violence recently, including the June assassination of the speaker of the Minnesota House and her husband, and the 2022 beating of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband in their San Francisco home.
Caitlin Legacki of Stop Government Censorship, formed to fight the Trump administration’s use of government against its political rivals, said it was one thing for people making abhorrent statements to face consequences.
“When we get concerned is when there appears to be a concerted effort in the government to use this tragedy to punish political opponents,” she said.