ֱ

Australia threatens fines for social media giants enabling misinformation

The bill is part of a wide-ranging regulatory crackdown by Australia, where leaders have complained that foreign-domiciled tech platforms are overriding the country’s sovereignty. (AFP/File)
The bill is part of a wide-ranging regulatory crackdown by Australia, where leaders have complained that foreign-domiciled tech platforms are overriding the country’s sovereignty. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 12 September 2024

Australia threatens fines for social media giants enabling misinformation

Australia threatens fines for social media giants enabling misinformation
  • Breaches face fines up to 5 percent of global revenue
  • Bill seeks to prevent election, public health disinformation

SYDNEY: Australia said it will fine Internet platforms up to 5 percent of their global revenue for failing to prevent the spread of misinformation online, joining a worldwide push to rein in borderless tech giants but angering free speech advocates.
The government said it would make tech platforms set codes of conduct governing how they stop dangerous falsehoods spreading, to be approved by a regulator. The regulator would set its own standard if a platform failed to do so, then fine companies for non-compliance.
The legislation, to be introduced in parliament on Thursday, targets false content that hurts election integrity or public health, calls for denouncing a group or injuring a person, or risks disrupting key infrastructure or emergency services.
The bill is part of a wide-ranging regulatory crackdown by Australia, where leaders have complained that foreign-domiciled tech platforms are overriding the country’s sovereignty, and comes ahead of a federal election due within a year.
Already Facebook owner Meta has said it may block professional news content if it is forced to pay royalties, while X, formerly Twitter, has removed most content moderation since being bought by billionaire Elon Musk in 2022.
“Misinformation and disinformation pose a serious threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as to our democracy, society and economy,” said Communications Minister Michelle Rowland in a statement.
“Doing nothing and allowing this problem to fester is not an option.”
An initial version of the bill was criticized in 2023 for giving the Australian Communications and Media Authority too much power to determine what constituted misinformation and disinformation, the term for intentionally spreading lies.
Rowland said the new bill specified the media regulator would not have power to force the takedown of individual pieces of content or user accounts. The new version of the bill protected professional news, artistic and religious content, while it did not protect government-authorized content.
Some four-fifths of Australians wanted the spread of misinformation addressed, the minister said, citing the Australian Media Literary Alliance.
Meta, which counts nearly nine in 10 Australians as Facebook users, declined to comment. Industry body DIGI, of which Meta is a member, said the new regime reinforced an anti-misinformation code it last updated in 2022, but many questions remained.
X was not immediately available for comment.
Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said that while he had yet to examine the revised bill, “Australians’ legitimately-held political beliefs should not be censored by either the government, or by foreign social media platforms.”
The Australia Communications and Media Authority said it welcomed “legislation to provide it with a formal regulatory role to combat misinformation and disinformation on digital platforms.”


Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza

Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza
Updated 10 August 2025

Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza

Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza
  • Access to Gaza has been tightly controlled over the course of 22 months of war against Hamas

JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Sunday a plan to allow more foreign journalists to report inside Gaza with the military, as he laid out his vision for victory in the territory during a rare press conference.

Access to Gaza has been tightly controlled over the course of 22 months of war against Hamas.

Israel has blocked most foreign correspondents from independently accessing the territory since it launched its campaign there following the Palestinian militant group’s unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack, with officials often citing security as a reason.

The Israeli military has taken journalists on occasional embeds that are tightly controlled by security officials.

“We have decided and have ordered, directed the military to bring in foreign journalists, more foreign journalists, a lot,” Netanyahu said during Sunday’s press conference.

“There’s a problem with assuring security, but I think it can be done in a way that is responsible and careful to preserve your own safety.”

The premier, however, did not provide specifics on the plan.

Global press outlets have long relied on local journalists on the ground in Gaza to provide reporting and footage from the war.


‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes

‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes
Updated 08 August 2025

‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes

‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes
  • Photojournalist Anas Zayed Fteiha came under fire after Bild published an article alleging his photos were manipulated to amplify narratives of Israeli-inflicted suffering
  • Episode fueled broader debate on the challenges of reporting from conflict zones such as Gaza, with expert saying “guiding” photos does not invalidate the reality being portrayed

LONDON: Gaza-based photojournalist Anas Zayed Fteiha has rejected accusations by the German tabloid Bild that some of his widely circulated images — depicting hunger and humanitarian suffering — were staged rather than taken at aid distribution sites.

Fteiha, who works with Turkiye’s Anadolu Agency, described the claims as “false” and “a desperate attempt to distort the truth.”

“The siege, starvation, bombing, and destruction that the people of Gaza live through do not need to be fabricated or acted out,” Fteiha said in a statement published on social media. “My photos reflect the bitter reality that more than two million people live through, most of whom are women and children.”

The controversy erupted after Bild published an article on Tuesday alleging that Fteiha’s photos were manipulated to amplify narratives of Israeli-inflicted suffering — particularly hunger — and citing content from his personal social media accounts to suggest political bias.

The German daily Suddeutsche Zeitung also questioned the authenticity of certain images from Gaza, though without naming Fteiha directly.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Bild claimed the emotionally charged imagery served as “Hamas propaganda,” a charge Fteiha rejected as “ridiculous” and a “criminalization of journalism itself.”

“It is easy to write your reports based on your ideologies, but it is difficult to obscure the truth conveyed by the lens of a photographer who lived the suffering among the people, heard the children’s cries, photographed the rubble, and carried the pain of mothers,” Fteiha said.

Fteiha also accused Bild of repeated breaches of journalistic ethics, citing previous criticism and formal complaints against the paper for publishing misinformation.

The episode has fueled a broader debate on the challenges of reporting from conflict zones such as Gaza, where foreign press access is restricted and local journalists are often the only source of visual documentation.

Following Bild’s allegations, several news agencies, including AFP and the German Press Agency, severed ties with Fteiha. However, Reuters declined to do so, stating that his images met the agency’s standards for “accuracy, independence, and impartiality.”

“These aren’t outright fakes, but they do tap into visual memory and change how people see things,” said photography scholar Gerhard Paul in an interview with Israeli media.

Christopher Resch, of Reporters Without Borders, said that while photographers sometimes “guide” subjects to tell a visual story, that does not invalidate the reality being portrayed.

“The picture should have had more context, but that doesn’t mean the suffering isn’t real,” he said, cautioning media outlets against labeling photojournalists as “propaganda agents,” which he warned could endanger their safety.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar also weighed in, using his official X account to describe one of the accused images — used on the cover of Time magazine — as an example of “Pallywood” — a portmanteau of “Palestine” and “Hollywood” — to sway global opinion.

However, the credibility of Bild’s report has itself come under scrutiny. Israeli fact-checking group Fake Reporter posted a series of rebuttals on X, disputing several claims.

The group pointed out that the Time magazine cover image often linked to Fteiha was taken by a different photographer, and argued that claims the children in the photograph were not at an aid site were “inaccurate.”

“From our examination, one can see, in the same place, an abundance of documentation of food being distributed and prepared,” the group wrote.


Deaf Palestinian uses social media to highlight Gaza’s struggles through sign language

Deaf Palestinian uses social media to highlight Gaza’s struggles through sign language
Updated 08 August 2025

Deaf Palestinian uses social media to highlight Gaza’s struggles through sign language

Deaf Palestinian uses social media to highlight Gaza’s struggles through sign language
  • Basem Alhabel describes himself as a ‘deaf journalist in Gaza’ on his Instagram account
  • He wants to raise more awareness of the conflict by informing Palestinians and people abroad with special needs

GAZA: Basem Alhabel stood among the ruins of Gaza, with people flat on the floor all around him as bullets flew, and filmed himself using sign language to explain the dangers of the war to fellow deaf Palestinians and his followers on social media.

Alhabel, 30, who describes himself as a “deaf journalist in Gaza” on his Instagram account, says he wants to raise more awareness of the conflict – from devastating Israeli air strikes to the starvation now affecting most of the population – by informing Palestinians and people abroad with special needs.

Bombarded by Israel for nearly two years, many Gazans complain the world does not hear their voices despite mass suffering with a death toll that exceeds 60,000 people, according to Gaza health authorities in the demolished enclave.

“I wished to get my voice out to the world and the voices of the deaf people who cannot speak or hear, to get their voice out there, so that someone can help us,” he said through his friend and interpreter Mohammed Moshtaha, who he met during the war.

“I tried to help, to film and do a video from here and there, and publish them so that we can make our voices heard in the world.”

Alhabel has an Instagram following of 141,000. His page, which shows him in a flak jacket and helmet, features images of starving, emaciated children and other suffering.

He films a video then returns to a tent to edit – one of the many where Palestinians have sought shelter and safety during the war, which erupted when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel in October 2023, drawing massive retaliation. Alhabel produced images of people collecting flour from the ground while he used sign language to explain the plight of Gazans, reinforcing the view of a global hunger monitor that has warned a famine scenario is unfolding.

“As you can see, people are collecting flour mixed with sand,” he communicated.

Alhabel and his family were displaced when the war started. They stayed in a school with tents.

“There was no space for a person to even rest a little. I stayed in that school for a year and a half,” he explained.

Alhabel is likely to be busy for some time. There are no signs of a ceasefire on the horizon despite mediation efforts.

Israel’s political security cabinet approved a plan early on Friday to take control of Gaza City, as the country expands its military operations despite intensifying criticism at home and abroad over the war.

“We want this situation to be resolved so that we can all be happy, so I can feed my children, and life can be beautiful,” said Alhabel.


MBC CEO granted Saudi premium residency

MBC CEO granted Saudi premium residency
Updated 07 August 2025

MBC CEO granted Saudi premium residency

MBC CEO granted Saudi premium residency
  • Sneesby said in a post on X that he feels immense pride in obtaining the premium residency in this country I have come to love
  • Executive took the helm at the Saudi media group earlier this year after serving as CEO of Nine Entertainment

RIYADH: The CEO of Riyadh-headquartered broadcaster MBC Group Mike Sneesby has been granted premium residency in ֱ.

Sneesby said in a post on X that he feels “immense pride in obtaining the premium residency in this country I have come to love, and have chosen to make my home since moving from Australia.”

The executive took the helm at the Saudi media group earlier this year after serving as CEO of Nine Entertainment.

The premium residency was launched in 2019 and allows eligible foreigners to live in the Kingdom and receive benefits such as exemption from paying expat and dependents fees, visa-free international travel, and the right to own real estate and run a business without requiring a sponsor.


Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs

Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs
Updated 07 August 2025

Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs

Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs
  • Furor arose after Grok wrongly identified a recent image of an underfed girl in Gaza as one from Yemen years back
  • Internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, but recent mistakes highlight the risks of blindly trusting the technology

PARIS: This image by AFP photojournalist Omar Al-Qattaa shows a skeletal, underfed girl in Gaza, where Israel’s blockade has fueled fears of mass famine in the Palestinian territory.
But when social media users asked Grok where it came from, X boss Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot was certain that the photograph was taken in Yemen nearly seven years ago.
The AI bot’s untrue response was widely shared online and a left-wing pro-Palestinian French lawmaker, Aymeric Caron, was accused of peddling disinformation on the Israel-Hamas war for posting the photo.
At a time when Internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, the furor shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok, when the technology is far from error-free.
Grok said the photo showed Amal Hussain, a seven-year-old Yemeni child, in October 2018.
In fact the photo shows nine-year-old Mariam Dawwas in the arms of her mother Modallala in Gaza City on August 2, 2025.
Before the war, sparked by Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Mariam weighed 25 kilograms, her mother told AFP.
Today, she weighs only nine. The only nutrition she gets to help her condition is milk, Modallala told AFP — and even that’s “not always available.”
Challenged on its incorrect response, Grok said: “I do not spread fake news; I base my answers on verified sources.”
The chatbot eventually issued a response that recognized the error — but in reply to further queries the next day, Grok repeated its claim that the photo was from Yemen.
The chatbot has previously issued content that praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and that suggested people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate.


Grok’s mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as “black boxes,” said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics.
“We don’t know exactly why they give this or that reply, nor how they prioritize their sources,” said Diesbach, author of a book on AI tools, “Hello ChatGPT.”
Each AI has biases linked to the information it was trained on and the instructions of its creators, he said.
In the researcher’s view Grok, made by Musk’s xAI start-up, shows “highly pronounced biases which are highly aligned with the ideology” of the South African billionaire, a former confidante of US President Donald Trump and a standard-bearer for the radical right.
Asking a chatbot to pinpoint a photo’s origin takes it out of its proper role, said Diesbach.
“Typically, when you look for the origin of an image, it might say: ‘This photo could have been taken in Yemen, could have been taken in Gaza, could have been taken in pretty much any country where there is famine’.”
AI does not necessarily seek accuracy — “that’s not the goal,” the expert said.
Another AFP photograph of a starving Gazan child by Al-Qattaa, taken in July 2025, had already been wrongly located and dated by Grok to Yemen, 2016.
That error led to Internet users accusing the French newspaper Liberation, which had published the photo, of manipulation.


An AI’s bias is linked to the data it is fed and what happens during fine-tuning — the so-called alignment phase — which then determines what the model would rate as a good or bad answer.
“Just because you explain to it that the answer’s wrong doesn’t mean it will then give a different one,” Diesbach said.
“Its training data has not changed and neither has its alignment.”
Grok is not alone in wrongly identifying images.
When AFP asked Mistral AI’s Le Chat — which is in part trained on AFP’s articles under an agreement between the French start-up and the news agency — the bot also misidentified the photo of Mariam Dawwas as being from Yemen.
For Diesbach, chatbots must never be used as tools to verify facts.
“They are not made to tell the truth,” but to “generate content, whether true or false,” he said.
“You have to look at it like a friendly pathological liar — it may not always lie, but it always could.”