ŗ£½ĒÖ±²„

Twitter needs to explain policy on pro-Kashmir content, Pakistan says

An Indian paramilitary soldier is seen through barbed wire as he stands guard during security lockdown in Srinagar, Indian controlled Kashmir, Sunday, Feb. 24, 2019. (AFP)
An Indian paramilitary soldier is seen through barbed wire as he stands guard during security lockdown in Srinagar, Indian controlled Kashmir, Sunday, Feb. 24, 2019. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 11 February 2021

Twitter needs to explain policy on pro-Kashmir content, Pakistan says

Twitter needs to explain policy on pro-Kashmir content, Pakistan says
  • 280 Pakistanis’ handles suspended or blocked for posting about right to self-determination of Kashmiris, PTA says
  • Digital rights activists urge government to adopt ā€˜uniform’ policy on the blocking of content by social media firms

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistan government adviser on digital media has said Twitter needed to explain its policy on pro-Kashmir content, after the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority wrote to Twitter about 280 accounts blocked or suspended for posting tweets in support of self-determination for the people of disputed Kashmir.
In a statement on Tuesday, PTA said 280 valid handles had been suspended, alleging that ā€œunder Indian influence, the social media platform is not only depriving Pakistani users of their fundamental rights but also violating its own community guidelines.ā€
The account suspensions and blockade came after Kashmir Solidarity Day on February 5, an annual day observed in Pakistan in support of the Kashmir cause. The Muslim-majority Himalayan region is claimed in full by India and Pakistan and ruled in part by both. The nations have also fought two wars over the disputed region.
ā€œThis [blocking of accounts] is something very serious, and we are looking into it,ā€ Dr. Arslan Khalid, Prime Minister Imran Khan’s focal person on digital media, told Arab News on Wednesday. ā€œTwitter on its own should explain why these suspensions took place and what is their policy on content on Kashmir.ā€
Digital rights activists have used the suspensions to urge the government to adopt a ā€˜uniform and impartial’ policy on the issue, pointing out that while Pakistani authorities opposed the suspension of some accounts, they themselves had devised new Internet laws under which they could ask social media platforms to block content that was critical of the government or state institutions.
The new rules were approved initially by Prime Minister Imran Khan’s cabinet last February but rolled out in November.
They give the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority ā€œremoval and blockingā€ powers of digital content that ā€œharms, intimidates or excites disaffectionā€ toward the government or poses a threat to the ā€œintegrity, security and defense of Pakistanā€.
A service provider or social media company could face a fine up to 500 million rupees ($3.14 million) for non-compliance, which would in turn trigger a mechanism preventing the uploading and live streaming, particularly related to ā€œterrorism, hate speech, pornography, incitement to violence and detrimental to national securityā€.
A platform has to act within 24 hours or, in case of an emergency, six hours to remove content. The rules also empower the telecom authority to block an entire online system.
In November, industry body, the Asia Internet Coalition, wrote a letter to PM Khan and said the new social media rules would prevent Pakistani citizens from accessing a free and open Internet and shut the country’s digital economy off from the rest of the world.
Last month, the attorney general of Pakistan told the Islamabad High Court the government was ready to review the new Internet rules and would invite all relevant stakeholders for consultations.
ā€œThis is very interesting to know: that the government is urging Twitter to unblock the [pro-Kashmir] accounts, unlike sending requests to block the accounts of activists, journalists and dissidents,ā€ Usama Khilji, who works with digital rights group Bolo Bhi, told Arab News, adding that the government should take a consistent stance on online freedom.
ā€œWhen the government raises a voice for some specific accounts only, it seems like a political approach,ā€ he said. ā€œThe government should also stop sending requests to the tech companies for suspension of dissident accounts.ā€
However, Khilji added: ā€œSocial media companies should be transparent too in their actions and provide reasons for suspension or blocking of accounts.ā€